Skip to main content Accessibility help

History, theory, and contingency in the study of modern international relations: the global transformation revisited

  • Alexander Anievas (a1)


Debates engaging the problems of ahistoricism and Eurocentrism in International Relations (IR) theory have taken on new dimensions in recent years. Scholars from a variety of different theoretical traditions have aimed to reconstruct IR theory on stronger historical–sociological grounds, while re-orienting the study of IR away from the fetish of ‘Western’ thought and agency. Buzan and Lawson’s The Global Transformation offers a welcome contribution to these endeavours to furnish a non-Eurocentric historical sociology of international relations. This article seeks to push their project further by re-assessing the relationship between history, theory, and contingency. In particular, it interrogates whether Buzan and Lawson’s ‘configurational’ approach to the ‘global transformation’, emphasizing the contingent concatenation of historical events and social processes, results in a displacement of theory through an over-emphasis on the interaction of free-floating contingently related causes, causes that are external to any theoretical schema. This approach obscures the deeper, structural forces in the making of global modernity, most notably those that escape Buzan and Lawson’s singular focus on the ‘long 19th century’.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Allinson, Jamie. 2015. “When Ernest Met Leon.” The Disorder of Things.
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left.
Anievas, Alexander, and Nişancioğlu, Kerem. 2015. How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London: Pluto.
Brandon, Pepijn. 2015. Masters of War: State, Capital, and Military Enterprise in the Dutch Cycle of Accumulation (1600-1795). Leiden: Brill.
Brewer, John. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688-1783 . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015a. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015b. “The Global Transformation: A Response.” The Disorder of Things.
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2016. “Theory, History, and the Global Transformation.” International Theory 8(3):502522.
Buzan, Barry, and Little, Richard. 2000. International Systems in World History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, Luke. 2013. “Can Contingency Be ‘Internalized’ Into the Bounds of Theory? Critical Realism, the Philosophy of Internal Relations and the Solution of ‘Uneven and Combined Development.’Cambridge Review of International Affairs 26(3):573597.
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Go, Julian. 2015. “Closet Postcolonialists? On Buzan and Lawson’s Global Transformation.” The Disorder of Things.
Hobson, John M. 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inayatullah, Naeem, and Blaney, David. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. London: Routledge.
Kagarlitsky, Boris. 2014. From Empires to Imperialism: The State and the Rise of Bourgeois Civilisation. London: Routledge.
Lawson, George. 2004. Negotiated Revolutions: The Czech Republic, South Africa and Chile. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Lawson, George. 2012. “The Eternal Divide: History and International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 18(2):203226.
Linebaugh, Peter, and Rediker, Marcus. 2000. The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. London: Verso.
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power: Volume I, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, Michael. 1993. The Sources of Social Power: Volume II, The Rise of Classes and Nation States 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matin, Kamran. 2013. Recasting Iranian Modernity: International Relations and Social Change. London: Routledge.
Musgrave, Paul, and Nexon, Daniel. 2016. “The Global Transformation: More than Meets the Eye.” International Theory 8(3):436447.
Nexon, Daniel H. 2009. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Phillips, Andrew. 2016. “The Global Transformation, Multiple Early Modernities and International Systems Change.” International Theory 8(3):481491.
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2016. “Theory, History, and Great Transformations.” International Theory 8(3):422435.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.
Rosenberg, Justin. 2006. “Why is There No International Historical Sociology?European Journal of International Relations 12(3):307340.
Rosenberg, Justin. 2013. “The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of Uneven and Combined Development.” Review of International Studies 39(3):569597.
Ruggie, John G. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47(1):139174.
Shilliam, Robbie. ed. 2010. International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London: Routledge.
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and its Competitors: An Analysis of Systems Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.
t’hart, Marjolein. 1993. The Making of a Bourgeois State: War, Politics and Finance During the Dutch Revolt. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Thompson, Debra. 2015. “Through, Against, and Beyond the Racial State.” In Race and Racism in International Relations: Confronting the Global Colour Line, edited by Alexander Anievas, Nivi Manchanda, and Robbie Shilliam, 4461. London: Routledge.
Wade, Maurice L. 2000. “From Eighteenth- to Nineteenth-Century Racial Science: Continuity and Change.” In Race and Racism in Theory and Practice, edited by Berel Lang, 2744. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlfield.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974–2011. The Modern World-System, 4 Volumes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2002. The Origin of Capitalism. London: Verso.

History, theory, and contingency in the study of modern international relations: the global transformation revisited

  • Alexander Anievas (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.