Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:16:52.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Keep muddling through?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

Raymond Mercado*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addison, P. (2007), Winston Churchill, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1934), The Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle (1960), Posterior Analytics and Topica, Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B. (1985), ‘Toward a scientific understanding of international conflict: a personal view’, International Studies Quarterly 29(2): 121136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R. (1960), Discourse on Method and Meditations, Indianapolis, IL, USA: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Elman, C.Elman, M.F. (2002), ‘How not to be Lakatos intolerant: appraising progress in IR research’, International Studies Quarterly 46(2): 231262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory, London, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacson, W. (1992), Kissinger, New York, USA: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Kennan, G.F. (1967), Memoirs 1925–1950, Boston, MA, USA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn., Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapid, Y. (1989), ‘The third debate: on the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era’, International Studies Quarterly 33(3): 235254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1996), Discourses on Livy, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, N. (1998), The Prince, 2nd edn., Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, N.Ruby, K. (2009), ‘IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations’, International Theory 1(1): 1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, L. (1965), Natural Right and History, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, L. (1971), ‘Philosophy as rigorous science and political philosophy’, Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 2(1): 19.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1988), What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1995a), ‘Existentialism’, Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 22(3): 303320.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (1995b), Liberalism Ancient and Modern, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. (2007), ‘What can we learn from political theory?’, The Review of Politics 69(4): 515529.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (1967), ‘The empirical, normative, and theoretical foundations of international studies’, The Review of Politics 29(2): 147159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thucydides (1989), The Peloponnesian War: The Complete Hobbes Translation, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, J. (1995), ‘The post-positivist debate: reconstructing scientific enquiry and international relations theory after enlightenment’s fall’, in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds), International Relations Theory Today, University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Zerilli, L. (2006), ‘Truth and the lure of method’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47(5): 411418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar