Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:48:24.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The logic and illogic of the security dilemma and contemporary realism: a response to Wagner’s critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Randall L. Schweller
Randall L. Schweller*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Ohio State University, 2140 Derby Hall, Ohio 43210, USA
*
*E-mail: schweller.2@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Symposium on War and the State
Information
International Theory , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 288 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brodie, B. (ed.) (1946), The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order, Freeport, N.Y.: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Eggers, D. (2000), A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Fearon, J.D. (1995), ‘Rationalist explanations for war’, International Organization 49(3): 402.Google Scholar
Gilpin, R. (1981), War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1976), The Social Limits to Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G.J. (2001), After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1978), ‘Cooperation under the security dilemma’, World Politics 30(2): 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R. (1984), The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1986), ‘From balance to concert: a study of international security cooperation’, in K.A. Oye (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 58–79.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (1997), System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, R. (2001), ‘Was the cold war a security dilemma?’, Journal of Cold War Studies 3(1): 36.Google Scholar
Keohane, R.O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kydd, A.H. (2005), Trust and Mistrust in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Labs, E.J. (1997), ‘Beyond victory: offensive realism and the expansion of war aims’, Security Studies 6(4): 1–49.Google Scholar
Liberman, P. (1998), Does Conquest Pay?: The Exploitation of Occupied Industrial Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001), The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Powell, R. (2002), ‘Bargaining theory and international conflict’, Annual Review of Political Science 5: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, D. (1995), ‘Exploding the powder keg myth: preemptive wars almost never happen’, International Security 20(2): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, D. (2003), ‘Exploring the bargaining model of war’, Perspective on Politics 1(1): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T.C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schweller, R.L. (1996), ‘Neorealism’s status-quo bias: what security dilemma?’, Security Studies 5(3): 90–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, R.L. (1997), ‘New realist research on alliances: refining, not refuting, Waltz’s balancing proposition’, American Political Science Review 91(4): 927–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweller, R.L. (1999), ‘Realism and the present great-power system: growth and positional competition over scarce resources’, in E.B. Kapstein and M. Mastanduno (eds), Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 28–68.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. (1991), Myths of Expansion: Domestic Politics and International Ambition, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, R.H. (2007), War and the State: The Theory of International Politics, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar