Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Multistakeholderism: anatomy of an inchoate global institution

  • Mark Raymond (a1) and Laura DeNardis (a2)
Abstract

Building on John Ruggie’s pioneering study of multilateralism, this paper presents an analogous study of multistakeholder governance, or multistakeholderism. Its central argument is that multistakeholderism is, as yet, a much less well-defined institutional form. Cases exhibit significant variation both in the combinations of actor classes entitled to participate and the nature of authority relations among those actors. The first section discusses multistakeholderism as an institutional form, and proposes a taxonomy of its types. This section also briefly addresses the implications of the analysis for International Relations theory. The paper then conducts a comparative analysis of multistakeholderism, applying the taxonomy to five illustrative cases. It demonstrates the degree of inter-case variation, and the range of issue-areas across which the institutional form is employed and invoked by actors. Three cases are drawn from the increasingly contentious area of Internet governance; the paper thus makes a secondary contribution to this growing literature. The paper’s most striking finding in this regard is that Internet governance often fails to live up to its multistakeholder rhetoric. Other cases include governance of securities regulation and the governance of corporate social responsibility. The paper concludes by examining the implications of our argument, and identifying areas for further research.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Multistakeholderism: anatomy of an inchoate global institution
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Multistakeholderism: anatomy of an inchoate global institution
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Multistakeholderism: anatomy of an inchoate global institution
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Corresponding author
E-mail: mraymond@ou.edu, denardis@american.edu
References
Hide All
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Gartner, David. 2012. “Reimagining Participation in International Institutions.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 8:135.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54(3):421456.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan 2009a. “Strengthening International Regulation Through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42:501578.
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan 2009b. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State.” In The Politics of Global Regulation, edited by Walter Mattli, and Ngaire Woods, 4488. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization 54(3):401419.
Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Antonova, Slavka. 2008. Powerscape of Internet Governance – How was Global Multistakeholderism Invented in ICANN? Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
Baker, Andrew. 2010. “Restraining Regulatory Capture? Anglo-America, Crisis Politics and Trajectories of Change in Global Financial Governance.” International Affairs 86(3):647663.
Balkin, Jack M. 2008. “The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age.” Pepperdine Law Review 36:427444. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1335055.
Barlow, John P. 1996. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Davos, Switzerland, February 8. Accessed November 14, 2014. https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
Bradley, Caroline. 2005. “Private International Law-Making for the Financial Markets.” Fordham International Law Journal 29(1):127180.
Brousseau, Eric, Marzouki, Meryem, and Méadel, Cécile. eds. 2012. Governance, Regulation, and Powers on the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Büthe, Tim, and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bygrave, Lee A., and Bing, Jon. eds. 2009. Internet Governance: Infrastructure and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cerf, Vint, Ryan, Patrick, and Senges, Max. 2014. “Internet Governance is Our Shared Responsibility.” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy 10(1):141.
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1972. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
DeNardis, Laura. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Drezner, Daniel W. 2000. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and Multilateral Sanctions: When is Cooperation Counterproductive?International Organization 54(1):73102.
Dutton, William H., Palfrey, John, and Peltu, Malcolm. 2007. “Deciphering the Codes of Internet Governance: Understanding the Hard Issues at Stake.” Forum Discussion Paper No. 8, Oxford Internet Institute and e-Horizons Institute, January .
Dutton, William H., Dopatka, Anna, Hills, Michael, Law, Ginette, and Nash, Victoria. 2011. Freedom of Connection-Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory Ecology Shaping the Internet. Paris: UNESCO. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1654464.
Epstein, Dmitry. 2013. “The Making of Institutions of Information Governance: The Case of the Internet Governance Forum.” Journal of Information Technology 28:137149.
GAVI Alliance. 2015. “Governing GAVI.” Accessed November 14, 2014. http://www.gavi.org/about/governance/.
Glasius, Marlies. 2010. Expertise in the Cause of Justice: Global Civil Society Influence on the Statute for an International Criminal Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46(1):135.
Haufler, Virginia. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector: Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J.. eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Helleiner, Eric, Pagliari, Stefano, and Zimmermann, Hubert. eds. 2010. Global Finance in Crisis: The Politics of International Regulatory Change. New York: Routledge.
Hobson, John M., and Sharman, Jason C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1):6398.
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53(2):379408.
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
International Proposals to Regulate the Internet. 2012. “Hearing Before the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives.” 112th Congress, May 31, 2012,United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Internet Engineering Task Force. 2004. “A Mission Statement for the IETF.” RFC3935. Accessed November 14, 2014. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3935.txt.
IOSCO. 2010. “Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulations.” Accessed November 14, 2014. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD323.pdf.
Jackson, Robert H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Keene, Edward. 2007. “A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century.” International Organization 61(2):311339.
Keene, Edward 2013. “International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention.” Review of International Studies 39(5):10771090.
Keohane, Robert O. 1990. “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research.” International Journal 45(4):731764.
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4):761799.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1991. “Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier.” World Politics 43(3):336366.
Krouse, Richard W. 1982. “Polyarchy and Participation: The Changing Democratic Theory of Robert Dahl.” Polity 14(3):441463.
Lake, David A. 2007. “Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics.” International Security 32(1):4779.
Lake, David A. 2009. “Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order.” Review of International Studies 35(S1):3558.
Malcolm, Jeremy. 2008. Multi-Stakeholder Governance and the Internet Governance Forum. Wembley, Australia: Terminus Press.
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4):943969.
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organization 52(4):729757.
Mathiason, John. 2008. Internet Governance: The New Frontier of Global Institutions. New York: Routledge.
Mueller, Milton. 2010. Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mueller, Milton L. 2002. Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mueller, Milton L., Schmidt, Andreas, and Kuerbis, Brenden. 2013. “Internet Security and Networked Governance in International Relations.” International Studies Review 15(1):86104.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). 2014. “NTIA Announces Intent to Transition Key Internet Domain Name Functions.” Press release. Accessed March 14, 2014. www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 2014. “The Regime Complex for Managing Global Cyber Activities.” Global Commission on Internet Governance Paper Series, Paper No. 1. Accessed November 14, 2014. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/regime-complex-managing-global-cyber-activities.
Orsini, Amandine, Morin, Jean-Frédéric, and Young, Oran. 2013. “Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance?Global Governance 19(1):2739.
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” The American Economic Review 100(3):641672.
Ostrom, Vincent, Tiebout, Charles M., and Warren, Robert. 1961. “The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 55(4):831842.
Palfrey, John, and Gasser, Urs. 2012. Interop: The Promise and Perils of Highly Interconnected Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Price, Richard. 1998. “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines.” International Organization 52(3):613644.
Raymond, Mark. 2011. “Social Change in World Politics: Secondary Rules and Institutional Politics.” PhD diss., University of Toronto.
Raymond, Mark 2013a. “Renovating the Procedural Architecture of International Law.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 19(3):268287.
Raymond, Mark 2013b. “Puncturing the Myth of the Internet as a Commons.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. International Engagement on Cyber III (special issue): 516.
Raymond, Mark 2015. “Locating Authority in the International System: Authoritative Rules and Post-Anarchy International Relations Theory.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, February 21. http://web.isanet.org/Web/Conferences/New%20Orleans%202015/Archive/2a4f40c4-2b9b-4e24-acc6-2ee07be7bacd.pdf.
Reus-Smit. 1997. “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization 52(4):555589.
Reus-Smit 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Reynolds, Joyce, and Postel, Jon. 1987. “The Request for Comments Reference Guide.” RFC1000. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1000.txt.
Rosenau, James N. 1995. “Governance in the Twenty-First Century.” Global Governance 1(1):1343.
Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials. 2015. “RSB Governance.” Accessed November 14, 2014. http://rsb.org/about/governance/.
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1992. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.” International Organization 46(3):561598.
Ruggie, John Gerard 2001. “global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network.” Global Governance 7(4):371378.
Ruggie, John Gerard 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors, Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10(4):499531.
Ruggie, John Gerard 2014. “Global Governance and ‘New Governance Theory’: Lessons from Business and Human Rights.” Global Governance 20(1):517.
Sharman, Jason C. 2013. “International Hierarchies and Contemporary Imperial Governance: A Tale of Three Kingdoms.” European Journal of International Relations 19(2):189207.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stauffacher, Daniel, and Kleinwächter, Wolfgang. 2005. The World Summit on the Information Society. New York: United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force.
The Global Fund. 2014. “Governance Handbook.” Accessed November 14, 2014. http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/board/.
Underhill, Geoffrey R.D., and Zhang, Xiaoke. 2008. “Setting the Rules: Private Power, Political Underpinnings, and Legitimacy in Global Monetary and Financial Governance.” International Affairs 84(3):535554.
United Nations Global Compact Office. 2012. “Global Compact Local Network Report 2012.” New York, United Nations. Accessed November 14, 2014. http://unglobalcompact.org/docs/publications/LN_Report_2012.pdf.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Weiss, Thomas G., and Wilkinson, Rorden. 2014. “Rethinking Global Governance: Complexity, Authority, Power, Change.” International Studies Quarterly 58(1):207215.
Weissbrodt, David, and Kruger, Maria. 2003. “Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights.” American Journal of International Law 97(4):901922.
Welch, David A. 1993. Justice and the Genesis of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welch, David A 2013. “What is ‘Governance,’ Anyway?Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 19(3):253258.
Wendt, Alexander. 1998. “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24(5):101118.
Wendt, Alexander 2001. “Driving with the Rearview Mirror.” International Organization 55(4):10191049.
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2000. Multilateralism and the World Trade Organization. London: Routledge.
Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG). 2005. “Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance.” Working Group on Internet Governance, Chateau de Bossey. Accessed May 15, 2014. http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 90
Total number of PDF views: 947 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1298 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.