Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Realism, emotion, and dynamic allegiances in global politics

  • Andrew A. G. Ross (a1)

This article appeals to classical realism for new insights into the role emotions play in shifting the terrain of political allegiance in global politics. Although undetected in readings emphasizing rational statecraft, realists such as Hans Morgenthau and Reinhold Niebuhr were centrally concerned with human emotions and their political impact. While following the intellectual currents of their time in regarding emotions as fixed impulses, these realists’ deep appreciation for the contingencies of history also led them to cast emotions as socially conditioned mechanisms of adaptation. By revisiting the texts of classical realism, this paper develops a fresh account of how emotion responds to and engenders change in the social world – in particular, change in the location of political allegiances. I then show how Morgenthau and Niebuhr applied these ideas not only to the nation-state but also to the most vexing transnational phenomena of their time – communism and liberal internationalism. In conclusion, the paper speculates that these reflections on dynamic allegiances at the transnational level offer realists and other international relation theorists insight into the emotional appeal, adaptability, and organizational complexity of contemporary non-state movements and actors.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Fiona B Adamson . 2005. “Globalisation, Transnational Political Mobilisation, and Networks of Violence.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18(1):3149.

William Bain . 2000. “Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered.” Review of International Studies 26(3):445464.

Roland Bleiker Emma Hutchison . 2008. “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.” Review of International Studies 34(S1):115135.

Karin Knorr Cetina . 2005. “Complex Global Microstructures: The New Terrorist Societies.” Theory, Culture & Society 22(5):213234.

Neta C Crawford . 2009. “Human Nature and World Politics: Rethinking ‘Man’.” International Relations 23(2):271288.

D.P Crook . 1994. Darwinism, War, and History: The Debate over the Biology of War from the “Origin of Species” to the First World War. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Jack Donnelly . 2000. Realism and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Annette Freyberg-Inan . 2006. “Rational Paranoia and Enlightened Machismo: The Strange Psychological Foundations of Realism.” Journal of International Relations & Development 9(3):247268.

Todd Hall . 2012. “Sympathetic States: State Strategies, Norms of Emotional Behavior, and the 9/11 Attacks.” Political Science Quarterly 127(3):369400.

Todd H Hall . 2011. “We Will Not Swallow this Bitter Fruit: Theorizing a Diplomacy of Anger.” Security Studies 20(4):521555.

Richard Ned Lebow . 2000. “Contingency, Catalysts, and International System Change.” Political Science Quarterly 115(4):591.

Richard Ned Lebow 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Daniel J Levine . 2013. “Why Hans Morgenthau was not a Critical Theorist (and Why Contemporary IR Realists Should Care).” International Relations 27(1):95118.

Robert C Lieberman . 2002. “Ideas, Institutions, and Political Order: Explaining Political Change.” American Political Science Review(4):697712.

Jonathan Mercer 2005. “Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.” International Organization 59(1):77106.

Hans J Morgenthau 1967. “To Intervene or not to Intervene.” Foreign Affairs 45(3):425436.

Reinhold Niebuhr 2008. The Irony of American History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ulrik Enemark Petersen . 1999. “Breathing Nietzsche's Air: New Reflections on Morgenthau's Concepts of Power and Human Nature.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 24(1):83118.

Théodule Ribot . 1906. Essay on the Creative Imagination. Translated by Albert H. N. Baron. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.

Andrew A.G Ross . 2006. “Coming in From the Cold: Constructivism and Emotions.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2):197222.

Andrew A.G Ross 2010. “Why They Don't Hate Us: Emotion, Agency and the Politics of ‘Anti-Americanism’.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(1):109125.

Brent E Sasley . 2011. “Theorizing States’ Emotions.” International Studies Review 13(3):452476.

Robert Schuett . 2007. “Freudian Roots of Political Realism: The Importance of Sigmund Freud to Hans J. Morgenthau's Theory of International Power Politics.” History of the Human Sciences 20(4):5378.

Robert Schuett 2012. “Chasing Morgenthau, or: What is Political Realism?International Studies Review 14(1):131135.

Ty Solomon . 2012. “Human Nature and the Limits of the Self: Hans Morgenthau on Love and Power.” International Studies Review 14(2):201224.

Brent J Steele . 2007. “‘Eavesdropping on Honored Ghosts’: From Classical to Reflexive Realism.” Journal of International Relations and Development 10(3):272300.

Brent J Steele 2010. “Irony, Emotions and Critical Distance.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(1):89107.

Jennifer Sterling-Folker . 2002. “Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading.” International Studies Review 4(1):7397.

R.B.J Walker . 1987. “Realism, Change, and International Political Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 31(1):6586.

Alexander Wendt . 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 30(2):289316.

Michael C Williams . 2004. “Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 58(4):633665.

Michael C Williams 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 222 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 541 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.