Skip to main content
×
Home

Selectorate theory, the democratic peace, and public goods provision

  • Philip Arena (a1) and Nicholas P. Nicoletti (a2)
Abstract

We show that without a few peculiar modeling choices that are not justified by the core assumptions of the theory, selectorate theory neither unambiguously predicts the democratic peace nor that leaders of more inclusive regimes will rely upon the provision of public goods to remain in office, though they may be more likely to provide club goods. We illustrate these claims using relatively simple models that incorporate the core assumptions of their theory, while avoiding modeling choices we believe to be less appropriate. We argue for a revised version of selectorate theory, one that continues to emphasize the importance of the size of the winning coalition, yet we believe it provides a more realistic picture of democratic politics.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: parena@buffalo.edu
References
Hide All
Anderson Sally, and Souva Mark. 2010. “The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(4):543565.
Babst Dean. 1964. “Elective Governments – A Force for Peace.” The Wisconsin Sociologist 3(1):914.
Bennett D. Scott. 2006. “Towards a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection.” International Studies Quarterly 50(2):313338.
Bremer Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2):309341.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Smith Alastair, Siverson Randolph, and Morrow James. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, and Smith Alastair. 2007. “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(2):251284.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, and Smith Alastair 2009. “A Political Economy of Aid.” International Organization 63(2):309340.
Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Morrow James D., Siverson Randolph M., and Smith Alastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93(4):791807.
Chiozza Giacomo, and Goemans Hein. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?American Journal of Political Science 48(3):604619.
Clarke Kevin, and Primo David. 2012. Model Politics: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clarke Kevin, and Stone Randall. 2008. “Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival.” American Political Science Review 102(3):387391.
Danilovic Vesna, and Clare Joe. 2007. “The Kantian Liberal Peace (Revisited).” American Journal of Political Science 51(2):397414.
Debs Alexandre, and Goemans H.E.. 2010. “Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War.” American Political Science Review 104(3):430445.
Dorussen Han, and Ward Hugh. 2008. “Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2):189212.
Dorussen Han, and Ward Hugh 2010. “Trade Networks and the Kantian Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 47(1):2942.
Fearon James. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88(3):577592.
Fearon James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3):379414.
Fey Mark, Meirowitz Adam, and Ramsay Kristopher. 2013. “Credibility of Peaceful Agreements in Crisis Bargaining.” Political Science Research and Methods 1(1):2752.
Fey Mark, and Ramsay Kristopher. 2011. “Uncertainty and Incentives in Crisis Bargaining: Game-Free Analysis of International Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1):149169.
Gartzke Eric. 2007. “The Capitalist Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1):166191.
Gartzke Erik, Li Quan, and Boehmer Charles. 2001. “Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict.” International Organization 55(2):391438.
Gibler Douglas. 2007. “Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 51(3):131147.
Gibler Douglas 2012. The Territorial Peace. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Goemans Hein. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Henderson Errol. 2002. Democracy and War: The End of an Illusion?. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.
Henderson Errol 2009. “Disturbing the Peace: African Warfare, Political Inversion and the Universality of the Democratic Peace Thesis.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1):2558.
Huth Paul, and Allee Todd. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson Matthew, and Morelli Massimo. 2007. “Political Bias and War.” American Economic Review 97(4):13531373.
Kant Immanuel. 1983. Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Moral Practice. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.
Maoz Zeev, and Russett Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(3):624638.
McCarty Nolan, and Meirowitz Adam. 2007. Political Game Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGillivray Fiona, and Smith Alastair. 2006. “Credibility in Compliance and Punishment: Leader Specific Punishments and Credibility.” Journal of Politics 68(2):248258.
McGillivray Fiona, and Smith Alastair. 2008. Punishing the Prince: A Theory of International Relations, Political Institutions and Leader Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Morrow James, Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Siverson Randolph, and Smith Alastair. 2006. “Selection Institutions and War Aims.” Economics of Governance 7(1):3152.
Morrow James, Bueno de Mesquita Bruce, Siverson Randolph, and Smith Alastair. 2008. “Retesting Selectorate Theory: Separating the Effects of W from Other Elements of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 102(3):393400.
Mueller Dennis. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muthoo Abhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oneal John, and Russett Bruce. 1997. “The Classic Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2):267294.
Oneal John, Russett Bruce, and Berbaum Michael. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3):371393.
Patty John, and Weber Roberto. 2006. “Agreeing to Fight: An Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(3):305320.
Ray James Lee. 1995. Democracies in International Conflict. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Ray James Lee 2003. “A Lakatosian View of the Democratic Research Program.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by Colin Elman, and Miriam Fendius Elman, 209212. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Reiter Dan, and Stam Allan C. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Riker William, and Ordeshook Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1):2542.
Rosato Sebastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97(4):585602.
Ross Michael. 2006. “Is Democracy Good for the Poor?American Journal of Political Science 50(4):860874.
Russett Bruce, and Oneal John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Schultz Kenneth. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slantchev Branislav. 2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review 99(4):533547.
Slantchev Branislav 2006. “Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs.” International Studies Quarterly 50(2):445477.
Waltz Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Weeks Jessica. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62(1):3564.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 158 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 524 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.