Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:21:37.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When may soldiers participate in war?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2016

Uwe Steinhoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*

Abstract

I shall argue that in some wars both sides are (as a collective) justified, that is, they can both satisfy valid jus ad bellum requirements. Moreover, in some wars – but not in all – the individual soldiers on the unjustified side (i.e. on the side without jus ad bellum) may nevertheless kill soldiers (and also civilians as a side-effect) on the justified side, even if the enemy soldiers always abide by jus in bello constraints. The reason for this is that with regard to some forms of inflicting harm on others one may give special weight to one’s own interests and the interests of those to whom one has special responsibilities when assessing the proportionality of those acts. That is, the proportionality calculation may be agent-relative. This is in particular so in the case of foreseeably preventing innocent and non-threatening people from being saved (for instance, by shooting down a tactical bomber who would have saved them by destroying an ammunitions factory) but less so in the case of the intentional or foreseeable direct harming of innocent and non-threatening people (dropping bombs on people standing near an ammunitions factory). In the light of these considerations, I will then answer the question as to when soldiers may justifiably participate in war (and when not).

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Larry. 1999. “Unified Excuse of Preemptive Self-Protection.” Notre Dame Law Review 74:14751505.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Moore, Michael S.. 2015. “Deontological Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed January 2016. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/ethics-deontological/.Google Scholar
American Law Institute. 1962. Model Penal Code. Official Draft and Explanatory Notes. Washington, DC: The American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Anscombe, Gertrude E. M. 1981. The Collected Philosophical Papers: Vol. 3, Ethics, Religion and Politics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bazargan, Saba. 2014. “Killing Minimally Responsible Threats.” Ethics 125(1):114136.Google Scholar
Beevor, Antony. 2003. The Fall of Berlin. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Biggar, Nigel. 2013. In Defence of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Card, Richard. 2010. Criminal Law, 19th ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, George C. 1999. “The Defense of Necessity Considered from the Legal and Moral Points of View.” Duke Law Journal 48:9751042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopher, Russell L. 1995. “Unknowing Justification and the Logical Necessity of the Dadson Principle in Self-Defense.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15(2):229251.Google Scholar
Christopher, Russell L. 1998. “Self-Defense and Defense of Others.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27(2):123141.Google Scholar
Cochran, David C. 1996. “War-Pacifism.” Social Theory and Practice 22:161180.Google Scholar
Erb, Volker. 2003. “Rechtfertigender Notstand.” In Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Vol. 1, edited by Wolfgang Joecks and Klaus Miebach, 13461416. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Estlund, David. 2007. “On Following Orders in an Unjust War.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 15(2):213234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Cécile. 2012. Cosmopolitan War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabre, Cécile 2014. “Rights, Justice and War: A Reply.” Law and Philosophy 33:391425.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly K. 2004. “Defending Imminence: From Battered Women to Iraq.” Arizona Law Review 46:213262.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P. 1978. Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston, MA and Toronto: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
Graham, Peter A. 2010. “In Defense of Objectivism About Moral Obligation.” Ethics 121(1):88115.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2005. The Rights of War and Peace, edited by Richard Tuck. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hallet, Brian. 1999. “Just War Criteria.” In Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, and Conflict, Vol. 2, edited by Lester R. Kurtz and Jennifer E. Turpin, 283294. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hoffheimer, Michael H. 2007–08. “Codifying Necessity: Legislative Resistance to Enacting Choice-of-Evils Defenses to Criminal Liability.” Tulane Law Review 82:191246.Google Scholar
Hurd, Heidi. 2008. Moral Combat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2005. “The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing.” Philosophical Issues 15:386405.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2009. Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2014a. “Self-Defense Against Justified Threateners.” In How We Fight, edited by Helen Frowe and Gerald Lang, 104137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2014b. “Proportionality and Just Cause: A Comment on Kamm.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 11:428453.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S. 2010. Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Richard. 1995. Ethics, Killing and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pattison, James. 2013. “When Is It Right to Fight? Just War Theory and the Individual-Centric Approach.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16(1):3554.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2012. “Cosmopolitanism.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, edited by Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit, and Thomas Pogge, 312331. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. 1934. De Jure Naturae Et Gentium Libri Octo. Oxford/London: Clarendon Press/Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. 2013a. “The Moral Equality of Combatants – A Doctrine in Classical Just War Theory? A Response to Graham Parsons.” Journal of Military Ethics 12(2):181194.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. 2013b. “Culpability and Punishment in Classical Theories of the Just War.” In Just War: Authority, Tradition, and Practice, edited by Anthony F. Lang, Cian O’Driscoll, and John Williams, 160175. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M., Syse, Henrik, and Begby, Endre, eds. 2006. The Ethics of War: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renzo, Massimo. 2013. “Democratic Authority and the Duty to Fight Unjust Wars.” Analysis 73(4):668676.Google Scholar
Rivera-López, Eduardo. 2006. “Puzzles on Defending Others from Aggression.” Law and Philosophy 25:377386.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. 1975–76. “A Theory of Justification: Societal Harm as a Prerequisite for Criminal Liability.” UCLA Law Review 23:266292.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. 1996. “Competing Theories of Justification: Deeds v. Reasons.” In Harm and Culpability, edited by A. T. Simester and A. T. H. Smith, 4570. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Cheyney. 2011. “Democratic Duty and the Moral Dilemmas of Soldiers.” Ethics 122:1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangero, Boaz. 2006. Self-Defense in Criminal Law. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean P. 2005. “Existentialism is a Humanism.” In Existentialism, edited by Robert C. Solomon, 206214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shalom, Stephen R. 2011. “Killing in War and Moral Equality.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 8:495512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe. 2007. On the Ethics of War and Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2008. “Jeff McMahan on the Moral Inequality of Combatants.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(2):220226.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2012a. “Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants.” Journal of Ethics 13:339366.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2012b. “The Moral Equality of Modern Combatants and the Myth of Justified War.” Theoretical and Applied Ethics 1(4):3544.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2013. “Cécile Fabre, Cosmopolitan War.” Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Accessed January 2016. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/38635-cosmopolitan-war/.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2014a. “Why We Shouldn’t Reject Conflicts: A Critique of Tadros.” Res Publica 20(3):315322.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2014b. “Just Cause and ‘Right Intention.” Journal of Military Ethics 13(1):3248.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe ed. 2014c. Do All Persons Have Equal Moral Worth? On “Basic Equality” and Equal Respect and Concern Oxford University Press. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2014d. “Against Equal Respect and Concern, Equal Rights, and Egalitarian Impartiality.” In Do All Persons Have Equal Moral Worth? On “Basic Equality” and Equal Respect and Concern, edited by Uwe Steinhoff, 142172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2016a. “Self-Defense as Claim Right, Liberty, and Act-Specific Agent-Relative Prerogative.” Law and Philosophy 35(2):193209.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Uwe 2016b. ‘The Liability of Justified Attackers’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. doi: 10.1007/s10677-016-9712-y.Google Scholar
Tadros, Victor. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2000. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar