Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 29
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Banai, Ayelet 2016. Self-Determination and Resource Rights: In Defence of Territorial Jurisdiction Over Natural Resources. Res Publica, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 9.


    Banai, Ayelet 2016. Sovereignty over natural resources and its implications for climate justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 238.


    Branch, Jordan 2016. How should states be shaped? Contiguity, compactness, and territorial rights. International Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    Branch, Jordan 2016. Review. Global Discourse, Vol. 6, Issue. 1-2, p. 233.


    Huber, Jakob 2016. No right to unilaterally claim your territory: on the consistency of Kantian statism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, p. 1.


    Mancilla, Alejandra 2016. Review Article: The environmental turn in territorial rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 221.


    Meine, Anna 2016. Debating legitimacy transnationally. Global Discourse, p. 1.


    Scavenius, Theresa 2016. The Tragedy of the Few. Res Publica, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 53.


    Schuppert, Fabian 2016. Carbon Sink Conservation and Global Justice: Benefitting, Free Riding and Non-compliance. Res Publica, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 99.


    Dietrich, Frank and Wündisch, Joachim 2015. Territory Lost – Climate Change and the Violation of Self-determination Rights. Moral Philosophy and Politics, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,


    Kadercan, Burak 2015. Triangulating territory: a case for pragmatic interaction between political science, political geography, and critical IR. International Theory, Vol. 7, Issue. 01, p. 125.


    RISSE, MATHIAS 2015. Taking up space on earth: Theorizing territorial rights, the justification of states and immigration from a global standpoint. Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 4, Issue. 01, p. 81.


    Sandelind, Clara 2015. Territorial rights and open borders. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 487.


    Tesón, Fernando R. 2015. THE MYSTERY OF TERRITORY. Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 32, Issue. 01, p. 25.


    Van der Vossen, Bas 2015. Locke on Territorial Rights. Political Studies, Vol. 63, Issue. 3, p. 713.


    Banai, Ayelet 2014. The territorial rights of legitimate states: a pluralist interpretation. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 01, p. 140.


    Cabrera, Luis 2014. Individual rights and the democratic boundary problem. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 02, p. 224.


    Dietrich, Frank 2014. Territorial rights and demographic change. International Theory, Vol. 6, Issue. 01, p. 174.


    Espejo, Paulina Ochoa 2014. People, Territory, and Legitimacy in Democratic States. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 466.


    Ypi, Lea 2014. A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights. European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 288.


    ×

Why do states have territorial rights?

  • Anna Stilz (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1752971909000104
  • Published online: 01 July 2009
Abstract

What gives a particular state the right to exercise jurisdiction and enforcement power over a particular territory? Why does the state of Denmark have rights over the territory of Denmark, and not over the territory of Sweden, and vice versa? This paper first considers a popular argument that purports to ground state territorial rights in citizens’ rights of land ownership. On this view, the state has jurisdiction over territory insofar as its people owns the territory, and delegates jurisdictional powers over their land to the state. It is argued that we should reject this approach, because it is unable to explain: (a) how the state can establish a continuous territory; (b) why later generations consent to the state’s jurisdiction; and (c) why non-consenting property owners cannot secede.

Rather than considering state jurisdiction to be derived from the people’s prior property rights, this paper claims that we should consider state jurisdictional rights over territory to be primitive. It defends an alternative Kantian account of territorial rights. On this view, a state’s claim to jurisdiction over territory is justified if that state imposes a system of property law that meets certain basic conditions of legitimacy. This Kantian approach, it is argued, allows us to make better sense of state territorial rights.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: astilz@princeton.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B.S. Byrd J. Hruschka (2002), ‘The natural law duty to recognize private property ownership: Kant’s theory of property in his doctrine of right’, University of Toronto Law Journal 56: 217282.

A. Buchanan (1997), ‘Theories of secession’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 26(1): 3161.

T. Hill (2002), ‘Questions about Kant’s opposition to revolution’, Journal of Value Inquiry 36(3): 283298.

W. Kersting (1984), Wohlgeordnete Freiheit, Berlin: de Gruyter.

T. Meisels (2005), Territorial Rights, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

C. Nine (2008), ‘A Lockean theory of territory’, Political Studies 56: 148165.

P. Pettit (2005), ‘Rawls’s political ontology’, Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 4: 157174.

P. Pettit (2006), ‘Rawls’s peoples’, in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3856.

A.J. Simmons (2001b), ‘On the territorial rights of states’, Philosophical Issues 11: 300326.

H. Steiner (1977), ‘The natural right to the means of production’, Philosophical Quarterly 27(106): 4149.

R. Tuck (2003), ‘Boundaries from the natural law perspective’, in A. Buchanan and M. Moore (ed.), States, Nations, and Borders: the Ethics of Making Boundaries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

L. Wenar (1998), ‘Original acquisition of private property’, Mind 107(428): 799819.

K. Westphal (1992), ‘Kant on the state, law, and obedience to authority in the alleged “anti-revolutionary” writings’, Journal of Philosophical Research 17: 383426.

L. Wenar (2005), ‘The nature of rights’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(3): 223253.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: