Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T05:03:24.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are We “Missing the Boat” on Preventing the Spread of Invasive Plants in Rangelands?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kirk W. Davies*
U.S. Department of Agricultural–Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
Dustin D. Johnson
Oregon State University, Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management, Harney County Extension Office, 450 N Buena Vista #10, Burns, OR 97720
Corresponding author's E-mail:


Invasive plants are negatively affecting the ecological and economic production of rangelands by reducing resource productivity, decreasing biodiversity, displacing native vegetation, and altering ecosystem processes and functions. However, despite these well-known negative effects, once invasive plants are regionally established, limited effort is directed at preventing their continued spread across rangelands. Most efforts are directed at restoration at specific locations while additional rangelands are invaded. Restoring native plant communities invaded by exotic plants is frequently unsuccessful, especially in more arid environments, and is often too costly to apply at the scale required to make meaningful progress in reducing invasive plant populations relative to their expansion. Of the few prevention efforts being implemented, most are a second priority to control and restoration efforts. Integrating strategies to prevent new infestations and restrict the expansion of existing populations in invasive plant management programs is critical to limiting the negative effects of invasive plants in rangelands. However, we are “missing the boat” on this issue by not providing sufficiently developed and validated management actions. Limited information is available for developing management strategies to prevent the spread of invasive plants, although it has been suggested that land managers need to increase biotic resistance of desired plant communities, decrease invasive plant propagule pressure, and eradicate small incipient infestations to prevent the continued expansion of invasive plants. Thus, instead of scientifically validated methods developed to limit the spread of invasive plants, managers are often left with vague suggestions for preventing the continued spread of invasive plants. We suggest that if prevention is going to be successful, researchers are going to need to conduct more applied research to provide land managers with specific prevention strategies and quantify the benefits of various prevention strategies.

Notes and Commentary
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Literature Cited

Bakker, J. P. and Berendse, F. 1999. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol. Evol 14:6368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, B. A. and Mustard, J. F. 2006. Characterizing the landscape dynamics of an invasive plant and risk of invasion using remote sensing. Ecol. Appl 16:11321147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, M. L., D'Antonio, C. M., Richardson, D. M., Grace, J. B., Keeley, J. E., DiTomaso, J. M., Hobbs, R. J., Pellant, M., and Pyke, D. 2004. Effect of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. BioScience 54:677688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. L. and Peet, R. K. 2003. Diversity and invasibility of southern Appalachian plant communities. Ecology 84:3239.Google Scholar
Burke, M. J. W. and Grimes, J. P. 1996. An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776790.Google Scholar
Claassen, V. P. and Marler, M. 1998. Annual and perennial grass growth on nitrogen-depleted decomposed granite. Restor. Ecol 6:175180.Google Scholar
Cronk, C. B. and Fuller, J. L. 1995. Plant Invaders: The Threat to Natural Ecosystems. Pages 241 p. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C., Levine, J., and Thomsen, M. 2001. Ecosystem resistance to invasion and the role of propagule supply: a California perspective. J. Mediterr. Ecol 2:233245.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. and Meyerson, L. A. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restor. Ecol 10:703713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Vitousek, P. M. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 23:6387.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W. 2008. Medusahead dispersal and establishment in sagebrush steppe plant communities. Range. Ecol. Manage 61:110115.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W., Nafus, A. M., and Sheley, R. L. 2010. Non-native competitive perennial grass impedes the spread of an invasive annual grass. Biol. Invasions 12:31873194.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W. and Sheley, R. L. 2007. A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Sci 55:178184.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W., Sheley, R. L., and Bates, J. D. 2008. Does prescribed fall burning Artemisia tridentata steppe promote invasion or resistance to invasion after a recovery period? J. Arid Environ 72:10761085.Google Scholar
Davies, K. W. and Svejcar, T. J. 2008. Comparison of medusahead invaded and non-invaded Wyoming big sagebrush steppe in southeastern Oregon. Range. Ecol. Manage 61:623629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, K. W., Svejcar, T. J., and Bates, J. D. 2009. Interaction of historical and non-historical disturbances maintains native plant communities. Ecol. Appl 19:15361545.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiswerth, M. E. and Johnson, W. S. 2002. Managing nonindigenous invasive species: insights from dynamic analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ 23:319342.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasion by Animals and Plants. London Methuen. 181 p.Google Scholar
Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Leung, B., and Lodge, D. 2007. Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological invaders. Ecol. Econ 62:216222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hestir, E. L., Khanna, S., Andrew, M. E., Santos, M. J., Viers, J. H., Greenberg, J. A., Rajapakse, S. S., and Ustin, S. L. 2008. Identification of invasive vegetation using hyperspectral remote sensing in the California Delta ecosystem. Remote Sens. Environ 112:40344047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hironaka, M., Monsen, S. B., and Kitchen, comps, S. G. 1994. Medusahead: natural successor to the cheatgrass type in the northern Great Basin. Proceedings—Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands. Ogden, UT USDA–Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 8991.Google Scholar
Huang, C. and Asner, G. P. 2009. Applications of remote sensing to alien invasive plant studies. Sensors 9:48694889.Google Scholar
Huenneke, L. 1996. Ecological impacts of invasive plants in natural areas. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 49:119121.Google Scholar
Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., Haddad, N. M., et al. 1999. Effects of plant richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insects abundances, and diversity. Ecol. Lett 2:286293.Google Scholar
Kolb, A., Alpert, P., Enters, D., and Holzapfel, C. 2002. Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. J. Ecol 90:871881.Google Scholar
Lass, L. W., Prather, T. S., Glenn, N. F., Weber, K. T., Mundt, J. T., and Pettingill, J. 2005. A review of remote sensing of invasive weeds and example of the early detection of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) and babysbreath (Gypsophila paniculata) with a hyperspectral sensor. Weed Sci 53:242251.Google Scholar
Leung, B., Lodge, D. M., Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Lewis, M. A., and Lamberti, G. 2002. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond 269:24072413.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852854.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., Vilà, M., D'Antonio, C. M., Dukes, J. S., Grigulis, K., and Lavorel, S. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond 270:775781.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, W. M. 1999. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:15221536.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, R. A. and Sheley, R. L. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J. Range Manage 54:502517.Google Scholar
Milchunas, D. G. and Lauenroth, W. K. 1995. Inertia in plant community structure: state changes after cessation of nutrient-enrichment stress. Ecol. Appl 5:452458.Google Scholar
Moody, M. E. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol 25:10091021.Google Scholar
Nernberg, D. and Dale, M. R. T. 1997. Competition of five native prairie grasses with Bromus inermis under three moisture regimes. Can. J. Bot 75:21402145.Google Scholar
Papanastasis, V. P. 2009. Restoration of degraded grazing lands through grazing management: can it work? Restor. Ecol 17:441445.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. E. and Callaway, R. M. 2008. Weed-biocontrol insects reduce native-plant recruitment through second-order apparent competition. Ecol. Appl 18:14891500.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. BioScience 50:5365.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic cost associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ 52:273288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. and Gilpin, M. 1989. Theoretical issues in conservation biology. Pages 287305. In Roughgarden, J., May, R., and Levey, S. eds. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pitcairn, M. J., Schoenig, S., Yacoub, R., and Gendron, J. 2006. Yellow starthistle continues to spread in California. California Agriculture 60:8390.Google Scholar
Pokorny, M. L. and Krueger-Mangold, J. M. 2007. Evaluating Montana's dry woad (Isatis tinctoria) cooperative eradication project. Weed Technol 21:262269.Google Scholar
Pokorny, M. L., Sheley, R. L., Zabinski, C. A., Engel, R. E., Svejcar, T. J., and Borkowski, J. J. 2005. Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restor. Ecol 13:448459.Google Scholar
Randall, J. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technol 10:370383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaser, J. K., Meyerson, L. A., and Von Holle, B. 2008. Saving camels from straws: how propagule pressure–based prevention policies can reduce the risk of biological invasion. Biol. Invasions 10:10851098.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral. Ecol 25:497506.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? 249253. In Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N. eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland IUCN SSAC Invasive Species Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Rinella, M. J., Maxwell, B. D., Fay, P. K., Weaver, T., and Sheley, R. L. 2009. Control efforts exacerbates invasive-species problem. Ecol. Appl 19:155162.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Manoukian, M., and Marks, G. 1996. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Rangelands 18:100101.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Manoukian, M., and Marks, G. 1999. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Pages 6972. In Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K. eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Svejcar, T. J., and Maxwell, B. D. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technol 10:766773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. A., Johnson, W. S., Shonkwiler, J. S., and Swanson, S. R. 1999. The implications of variable or constant expansion rates in invasive weed infestations. Weed Sci 47:6266.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Barnett, D. T., and Kartesz, J. 2003. The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front. Ecol. Environ 1:1114.Google Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., Chong, G. W., et al. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr 69:2546.Google Scholar
Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:8192.Google Scholar
Vasquez, E., Sheley, R., and Svejcar, T. 2008. Nitrogen enhances the competitive ability of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) relative to native grasses. Invasive Plant Sci. Manage 1:287295.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., Rejmanek, M., and Westbrooks, R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol 21:116.Google Scholar
Wedin, D. and Tilman, D. 1993. Competition among grasses along a nitrogen gradient: initial conditions and mechanisms of competition. Ecol. Monogr 63:199229.Google Scholar
Wedin, D. and Tilman, D. 1996. Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274:17201723.Google Scholar
Westbrooks, R. 1998. Invasive Plants, Changing the Landscape of America: Fact Book. Washington, DC Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds. 109 p.Google Scholar
Westbrooks, R. G. 2004. New approaches for early detection and rapid response to invasive plants in the United States. Weed Technol 18:14681471.Google Scholar
White, T. A., Campbell, B. D., and Kemp, P. D. 1997. Invasion of temperate grassland by a subtropical annual grass across an experimental matrix of water stress and disturbance. J. Veg. Sci 8:847854.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, R. and Cock, M. J. 2001. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, Oxon, UK CABI Publishing Global Invasive Species Programme. 228 p.Google Scholar