Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:43:27.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control Techniques and Management Strategies for the Problematic Navua sedge (Cyperus aromaticus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph S. Vitelli ,
Barbara A. Madigan  and
Peter E. van Haaren
Joseph S. Vitelli*
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Queensland, Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development & Innovation, P.O. Box 36, Sherwood, Queensland, Australia 4075
Barbara A. Madigan
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Queensland, Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development & Innovation, P.O. Box 187, Charters Towers, Queensland, Australia 4820
Peter E. van Haaren
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Queensland, Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development & Innovation, P.O. Box 20, South Johnstone, Queensland, Australia 4859
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: joseph.vitelli@deedi.qld.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Navua sedge, a member of the Cyperaceae family, is an aggressive weed of pastures in Fiji, Sri Lanka, the Malay Peninsula, Vanuatu, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, and Tahiti and is now a weed of pastures and roadsides in north Queensland, Australia. Primarily restricted to areas with an annual rainfall exceeding 2,500 mm (98.4 in), Navua sedge is capable of forming dense stands, smothering many tropical pasture species. Seventeen herbicides were field tested at three sites in north Queensland, with glyphosate, halosulfuron, hexazinone, imazapic, imazapyr, or MSMA as the most effective for Navua sedge control. Environmental problems, such as persistence in soil, lack of selectivity, and movement off-site, may occur using some herbicides at the predicted 90% lethal concentration (LC90) control level rates. A seasonality trial using halosulfuron (97.5 g ai ha−1 [1.4 oz ac−1]) gave better Navua sedge control (84%) by spraying in March to September than by spraying at other times (50%). In a frequency trial, sequential glyphosate applications (2,160 g ae ha−1) every 2 mo was more effective for continued Navua sedge control (67%) than a single application of glyphosate (36%), although loss of ground cover would occur. In a management trial, single applications of glyphosate (2,160 to 3,570 g ae ha−1) using either a rope wick, ground foliar spraying, or a rotary rope wick gave 59 to 73% control, whereas other treatments (rotary hoe, 3%; slashing, −13%; crushing, −30%) were less effective. In a second management trial, four monthly rotary wick applications were much more effective (98%) than four monthly crushing applications (42%). An effective management plan must include the application of regular herbicide treatments to eliminate Navua sedge seed being added to the soil seed bank. Treatments that result in seed burial, for example, discing, are likely to prolong seed persistence and should be avoided. The sprouting activity of vegetative propagules and root fragmentation also needs to be considered when selecting control options.

Keywords

GlyphosatehalosulfuronhexazinoneimazapicimazapyrMSMANavua sedge, Cyperus aromaticus (Ridley) Mattf. & KukenthProbit analysis

Information

Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 315 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ando, C., Segawa, R., Gana, C., et al. 2003. Dissipation and offsite movement of forestry herbicides in plants of importance to native Americans in California National Forests. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 71:354–361.Google Scholar
Armbrust, K. L. and Bridges, D. C. 2002. Dissipation of monosodium methane arsonate (MSMA) on peanuts. J. Agric. Food Chem 50:1959–1963.Google Scholar
Bede, J. C., Teal, P., and Tobe, S. S. 1999. Production of insect juvenile hormone III and its precursors in cell suspension cultures of the sedge, Cyperus iria L. Plant Cell Rep 19:20–25.Google Scholar
Bede, J. C. and Tobe, S. S. 2000. Activity of insect juvenile hormone III: seed germination and seedling growth studies. Chemoecology 10:89–97.Google Scholar
Belcher, J. L., Walker, R. H., Van Santen, E., and Wehtje, G. R. 2002. Nontuberous sedge and kyllinga species' response to herbicides. Weed Technol 16:575–579.Google Scholar
Benson, A. 1992. Navua sedge—potential problem weed for north Queensland. BSES Bull 37:14–15.Google Scholar
Black, I. D. 1984. Navua sedge in pastures in Fiji. Aust. Weeds 3:16–19.Google Scholar
Blum, R. R., Isgrigg, J., and Yelverton, F. H. 2000. Purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Technol 14:357–365.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J., Stephenson, D. O., and Unruh, J. B. 2005. Control of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) with herbicides and mowing. Weed Technol 19:809–814.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Grunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1991. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J 84:973–978.Google Scholar
Bureau of Meteorology 2008. Climate Data Online. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/. Accessed: April 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. D. and Grice, A. C. 2000. Weed biology: a foundation for weed management. Trop. Grassl 34:271–279.Google Scholar
Centrogen 2008. Weedbug—Wick Wiping Technology. http://www.centrogen.com.au/services/weedbug.html. Accessed: April 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Czarnota, M. A. and Bingham, S. W. 1997. Control of yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and Cyperus rotundus) in turfgrass with MON-12051. Weed Technol 11:460–465.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265.Google Scholar
Dovey, L., Orapa, W., and Randall, S. 2003. The need to build biological control capacity in the Pacific. Pages 36–41. In Cullen, J. M., Briese, D. T., Kriticos, D. J., Lonsdale, W. M., Morin, L., and Scott, J. K. eds. Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Canberra, Australia Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).Google Scholar
Duncan, K. W. and McDaniel, K. C. 1998. Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) management with imazapyr. Weed Technol 12:337–344.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. and Harvey, R. G. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and annual weed control in glyphosate-resistant field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 16:482–487.Google Scholar
Fowlkes, M. D., Michael, J. L., Crisman, T. L., and Prenger, J. P. 2003. Effects of the herbicide imazapyr on benthic macroinvertebrates in a logged pond cypress dome. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 22:900–907.Google Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L. 1990. Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans. Am. J. Altern. Agric 5:114–119.Google Scholar
Hixson, A. C., Gannon, T. W., and Yelverton, F. H. 2007. Efficacy of application placement equipment for tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum) growth and seedhead suppression. Weed Technol 21:801–806.Google Scholar
Hosking, J. R. 1997. Recent naturalisations of species in Australia—some species which could become a problem in New South Wales. Pages 58–63. In Michelmore, M. ed. Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Noxious Weeds Conference. Goulburn, Australia NSW Agriculture.Google Scholar
Infopest 2009. Infopest AgVet DVD. November ed. Brisbane, Australia Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development & Innovation.Google Scholar
Karan, B. 1976. Studies of Navua sedge (Cyperus aromaticus), part 2: control studies. Fiji Agric. J 38:61–71.Google Scholar
Kerr, D. V., Fell, R. F., Murray, A. J., and Chaseling, J. 1995. An assessment of factors associated with increased productivity of dairy farms in Fiji. Aust. J. Agric. Res 8:481–487.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C., Stone, D. M., and Harris, A. R. 1996. Sorption of hexazinone, sulfometuron methyl, and tebuthiuron on acid, low base saturated sands. Chemosphere 32:1681–1689.Google Scholar
Leck, M. A. and Schutz, W. 2005. Regeneration of Cyperaceae, with particular reference to seed ecology and seed banks. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst 7:95–133.Google Scholar
Lovely, W. G., Weber, C. R., and Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agron. J 50:621–625.Google Scholar
Monaco, T. A., Osmond, T. M., and Dewey, S. A. 2005. Medusahead control with fall- and spring-applied herbicides on northern Utah foothills. Weed Technol 19:653–658.Google Scholar
Mune, T. L. 1959. Navua sedge (Cyperus melanospermus (Nees) Valck. Suring.), a common pasture weed. Fiji Agric. J 29:23–25.Google Scholar
Mune, T. L. and Parham, J. W. 1967. The declared noxious weeds of Fiji and their control. Fiji Dep. Agric. Bull 48:1–87.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. H., Schroeder, J., Thomas, S. H., and Murray, L. W. 2007. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) management in direct-seeded chile pepper using halosulfuron and cultivation. Weed Technol 21:636–641.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. H. 2008. Effect of tillage intensity and herbicide programs on changes in weed species density and composition in the southeastern coastal plains of the United States. Crop Prot 27:151–160.Google Scholar
Oriade, C. and Forcella, F. 1999. Maximizing efficacy and economics of mechanical weed control in row crops through forecasts of weed emergence. J. Crop Prod 2:189–205.Google Scholar
Parsons, W. T. and Cuthbertson, E. G. 2001. Noxious Weeds of Australia. 2nd ed. Melbourne, Australia CSIRO. 51–55.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L. and Thill, D. C. 2002. The response of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), annual grasses, and smooth brome (Bromus inermis) to imazapic and picloram. Weed Technol 16:366–370.Google Scholar
Shinn, S. L. and Thill, D. C. 2003. The response of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa), and meadow hawkweed (Hieracium caespitosum) to imazapic. Weed Technol 17:94–101.Google Scholar
Steel, R. J. and Whiteman, P. C. 1980. Pasture Species Evaluation, Pasture Fertiliser Requirements and Weed Control in the Solomon Islands. St. Lucia, Australia University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Nema, D. P., and Bhan, V. M. 1972. Yellow nutsedge tuber germination and seedling development. Weed Sci 20:93–97.Google Scholar
Summerlin, J. R., Coble, H. D., and Yelverton, F. H. 2000. Effect of mowing on perennial sedges. Weed Sci 48:501–507.Google Scholar
van der Valk, A. G. and Davis, C. B. 1979. A reconstruction of the recent vegetational history of a prairie marsh, Eagle Lake, Iowa, from its seed bank. Aquat. Bot 6:29–51.Google Scholar
Vitelli, J. S. and Pitt, J. L. 2006. Assessment of current weed control methods relevant to the management of the biodiversity of Australian rangelands. Rangeland J 28:37–46.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2003. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) eradication: impossible dream? 21–25. in. National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations—2002. Ogden, Utah U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-P-28.Google Scholar
Weng, C. C., Keng, C. L., and Lim, B. P. 2004. Detection of insect juvenile hormone III and its precursors from in vitro plantlets of Cyperus aromaticus . J. Plant Biol 47:187–193.Google Scholar
Worthing, C. R. 1979. The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium. 6th ed. Farnham, Surrey, UK The British Crop Protection Council. 472 p.Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. and Li, Q. X. 2002. Movement of bromacil and hexazinone in soils of Hawaiian pineapple fields. Chemosphere 49:669–674.Google Scholar