Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-dnb4q Total loading time: 0.4 Render date: 2022-07-03T23:09:53.734Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Implementing Strategic Weed Prevention Programs to Protect Rangeland Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brenda S. Smith*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
Roger L. Sheley
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: brenda.smith@oregonstate.edu

Abstract

Weed prevention is recognized as one of the most cost-effective management strategies for invasive plants. In the field of invasive plant management increasing emphasis is being directed toward proactive management. However, land managers are still somewhat reluctant to aggressively employ prevention programs. Part of this reluctance could be due to lack of understanding of what a comprehensive prevention program entails. The purpose of this paper is to improve strategic decision-making for site-specific prevention programs, such as those on ranches or in watersheds. Our interest is in advancing prevention planning for land managers—the people who are faced with the constant pressure of potential invasive species infestations on a day-to-day basis. To facilitate more widespread use of prevention programs we are proposing definitions for key terminology to standardize and facilitate communication about prevention programs. Additionally, we present a flow model with the steps necessary to successfully implement such programs. The model has three categories from which specific prevention planning occurs: (1) education, (2) early detection and eradication, and (3) interruption of movement. The flow model directs users through a series of interlinked steps. Finally, we provide a case study in which a ranch manager implemented a prevention program using this framework. By using this model, managers are poised to conduct more strategic planning. This model also has applications in outreach and education programs to assist land managers in prevention planning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunson, MW, Huntsinger, L (2008) Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the New West? Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:137147 Google Scholar
[Cal-IPC] California Invasive Plant Council (2012) Preventing the Spread of Invasive Plants: Best Management Practices for Land Managers. 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA California Invasive Plant Council Publication 2012-03. 80 p. Available at http://www.cal-ipc.org. Accessed September 25, 2013Google Scholar
Carrick, PJ, Krüger, R (2007) Restoring degraded landscapes in lowland Namaqualand: lessons from the mining experience and from regional ecological dynamics. J Arid Environ 70:767781 Google Scholar
Christensen, S, Ransom, C, Sheley, R, Smith, B, Whitesides, R (2011) Establishing a weed prevention area: a step by step user's guide. Burns, OR USA U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service. 40 pGoogle Scholar
Cusack, C, Harte, M, Chan, S (2009) The economics of invasive species. Corvallis, OR Oregon Sea Grant. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Daab, MT, Flint, CG (2010) Public reaction to invasive plant species in a disturbed Colorado landscape. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:390401 Google Scholar
Davies, KW (2008) Medusahead dispersal and establishment in sagebrush steppe plant communities. Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:110115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, KW, Johnson, DD (2009) Prevention: a proactive approach to the control of invasive plants on wildlands. Pages 8296 in Wilcox, CP, Turpin, RP, eds. Invasive Species: Detection, Impact and Control. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Johnson, DD (2011) Are we “missing the boat” on preventing the spread of invasive plants in rangelands? Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:166171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, KW, Nafus, AM, Madsen, MD (2013) Medusahead invasion along unimproved roads, animal trails, and random transects. West N Am Nat 73:5459 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Nafus, AM, Sheley, RL (2010) Non-native competitive perennial grass impedes the spread of an invasive annual grass. Biol Invasions 12:31873194 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Sheley, RL (2007) A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Sci 55:178184 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Sheley, RL (2011) Promoting native vegetation and diversity in exotic annual grass infestations. Restor Ecol 19:159165 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Svejcar, TJ (2008) Comparison of medusahead-invaded and noninvaded Wyoming big sagebrush stepped in southeastern Oregon. Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:623629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, CA, Jachetta, JJ (2005) Introduction. Pages 17 in Duncan, CL, Clark, JK, eds. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Gelbard, JL, Belnap, J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semi-arid landscape. Conserv Biol 17:420432 Google Scholar
Goodwin, K, Jacobs, J (2007) Developing invasive weed prevention areas for rangeland ecosystems. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bozeman MTInvasive Species Technical Note No. MT-15. Pages 7 pGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, K, Sheley, R, Jacobs, J, Wood, S, Manoukian, M, Schuldt, M, Miller, E, Sackman, S (2012) Cooperative prevention systems to protect rangelands from the spread of invasive plants. Rangeland J 34:2631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, S, Fattorini, M (2004) Advances in restoration ecology: insights from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 1033 in Temperton, VM, Hobbs, RJ, Nuttle, T, Halle, S, eds. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Washington, DC Island Press Google Scholar
Havstad, KM, Peters, DPC, Skaggs, R, Brown, J, Bestelmeyer, B, Fredrickson, E, Herrick, J, Wright, J (2007) Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecol Econ 64:261268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemstrom, MA, Wisdom, MJ, Hann, , Rowland, MM, Wales, BC, Gravenmier, RA (2002) Sagebrush-steppe vegetation dynamics and restoration potential in the interior Columbia Basin, USA. Conserv Biol 16:12431255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, RJ, Humphries, SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9:761770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntsinger, L, Johnson, M, Stafford, M, Fried, J (2010) Hardwood rangeland landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: production, ecosystem services and permanence. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:324334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J (2007) Invasive plant management: options and actions. Chapter 10 in Invasive Plant Management: CIPM Online Textbook Center for Invasive Plant Management. Bozeman, MT Center for Invasive Plant Management. http://www.weedcenter.org/index.html. Accessed September 25, 2013Google Scholar
James, JJ, Davies, KW, Sheley, RL, Aanderud, ZT (2008) Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the Great Basin. Oecologia 156:637648 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulmatiski, A, Beard, KH, Stark, JM (2006) Exotic plant communities shift water-use timing in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Plant Soil 288:271284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. (2001) Non-Native Plant Invasions in Rocky Mountain National Park: Linking Species Traits and Habitat Characteristics. Master's thesis. Fort Collins, CO Colorado State University 218 pGoogle Scholar
Moody, ME, Mack, RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25:10091021 Google Scholar
National Invasive Species Council, (2008) 2008–2012 National Invasive Species Management Plan, Accessed August 12, 2013, at http://www.doi.gov/invasivespecies/upload/2008-2012-National-Invasive-Species-Management-Plan.pdf. 35 pGoogle Scholar
Panetta, FD, Mitchell, ND (1991) Homocline analysis and the prediction of weediness. Weed Res 31:273284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North American Invasive Species Management Association. 2014. North American invasive species mapping standards. http://www.naisma.org/images/NAISMA_Mapping_Standards2014_1.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. J Ecol Econ 52:273288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pokorny, ML, Kreuger-Mangold, JM (2007) Evaluating Montana's dyer's woad (Isastis tinctoria) cooperative eradication project. Weed Technol 21:262269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS, Ghersa, CM (2007) Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ J. Wiley. 454 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, CV, Whitesides, RE (2012) Proactive EBIPM—establishing weed prevention areas. Rangeland J 34:3538 Google Scholar
Reeves, MC, Mitchell, JE (2012) A Synoptic Review of U.S. rangelands: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Fort Collins, CO U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-288. 128 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejmánek, M, Pitcairn, MJ (2002) When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? Pages 249253 in Veitch, CR, Clout, MN, eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Invasive Species Specialist Group Google Scholar
Rew, L, Maxwell, B (2007) Monitoring non-native plant populations. Chapter 7 in Center for Invasive Plant Management, ed. Invasive Plant Management: CIPM Online Textbook Bozeman, MT Center for Invasive Plant Management. http://www.weedcenter.org/textbook/index.html. Accessed August 12, 2013Google Scholar
Rew, LJ, Pokorny, ML eds (2006) Inventory and Survey Methods for Nonindigenous Plant Species. Bozeman, MT Montana State University Extension. Extension Service Bulletin EB 4503. 75 pGoogle Scholar
Sheley, RL, James, JJ, Rinella, MJ, Blumenthal, DM, DiTomaso, JM (2011) Invasive plant management on anticipated conservation benefits: a scientific assessment. Pages 291336 in Briske, DD, ed. Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps. Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Google Scholar
Sheley, R, James, J, Smith, B, Vasquez, E (2010) Applying ecologically based invasive plant management. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:605613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, RL, Kedzie-Webb, S, Maxwell, BD (1999) Integrated weed management on rangeland. Pages 5768 in Sheley, RL, Petroff, JK, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press Google Scholar
Sheley, RL, Smith, BS (2012) Prioritizing invasive plant management strategies. Rangeland J 34(6):1114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travest, A, Richardson, DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208216 Google Scholar
U.S. Economic Research Service 2011. Value of U.S. Cattle and Calf Production. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/statistics-information.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2013.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service 2011. Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monitoring of Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants. Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, West Valley City, UT19 pGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, PM, D’Antonio, CM, Loupe, LL, Rejmanek, M, Westbrooks, R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21:116 Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C, Jordan, M, Sargis, G, Smith, H, Schwager, K (2011) An Invasive Plant Management Decision Tool. Version 1.1. Arlington, VA The Nature Conservancy. 43 pGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Implementing Strategic Weed Prevention Programs to Protect Rangeland Ecosystems
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Implementing Strategic Weed Prevention Programs to Protect Rangeland Ecosystems
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Implementing Strategic Weed Prevention Programs to Protect Rangeland Ecosystems
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *