Skip to main content

California Invasive Plant Research Needs Assessment

  • Ramona Robison (a1), Steve Schoenig (a2), Douglas W. Johnson (a3), Elizabeth Brusati (a3) and Joseph M. DiTomaso (a4)...

This project summarizes the opinion of 52 experts on the future research needs in the area of invasive plants in California. Experts included academics at private and public universities, Cooperative Extension educators, land managers, members of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), employees of restoration companies, and federal, state, and local agency personnel. Surveys were conducted through in-person interviews, written questionnaires, and workshops. The objective was to identify high-priority needs for future research on issues related to invasive plants in California's wildlands. More specifically, the goals were to (1) create a forum for assessing high-priority research needs, (2) guide future research toward these high-priority needs, and (3) facilitate connections and interactions among academic disciplines and between researchers and practitioners by increasing awareness of the range of ongoing research on invasive plants. Priority needs were chosen for 10 broad research topic areas, with specific subtopics addressed within each of these areas. In addition to noting specific research areas, there was a general need expressed for a synthesis of existing scientific information, particularly about the biology and ecology of invasive plants and the ecological impacts, control and management tools, restoration activities, and related social issues surrounding invasive plants. A mutual exchange of information was also considered important among the academic researcher and the field practitioner, as was the development of more effective training programs for land managers.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail:
Hide All
Anderson R. P., Lew D., and Peterson A. T. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model 162:211232.
Bangsund D. A., Nudell D. J., Sell R. S., and Leistritz F. L. 2001. Economic analysis of using sheep to control leafy spurge. J. Range Manag 54:322329.
Barbier E. and Knowler D. 2006. Commercialization decisions and the economics of introduction. Euphytica 148:151164.
Bashari H., Smith C., and Bosch O. J. H. 2008. Developing decision support tools for rangeland management by combining state and transition models and Bayesian belief networks. Agric. Sys 99:2334.
Bossard C., Moore K., Chabre C., Woolfolk A., King J., and Johanek D. 2005. A test of repeat flaming as a control for poison hemlock (Conium maculatum), cape ivy (Delairea odorata), and periwinkle (Vinca major). Pages 2934. In Skurka G. ed. Proceedings of the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) Symposium. Berkeley Cal-IPC.
Bossard C. C. and Randall J. M. 2007. Nonnative plants of California. Pages 107123. In Barbour M. G., Keeler-Wolf T., and Schoenherr A. A. eds. Terrestrial Vegetation of California. Berkeley University of California Press.
Brooks M. L. 2003. Effects of increased soil nitrogen on the dominance of alien annual plants in the Mojave Desert. J. Appl. Ecol 40:344353.
Brooks M. L., D'Antonio C. M., Richardson D. M., Grace J. B., Keeley J. E., DiTomaso J. M., Hobbs R. J., Pellant M., and Pyke D. 2004. Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54:677688.
Buhle E. R., Margolis M., and Ruesink J. L. 2005. Bang for buck: cost-effective control of invasive species with different life histories. Ecol. Econ 52:355366.
Byers J. E., Reichard S., Randall J. M., et al. 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conserv. Biol 16:630640.
Caley P. and Kuhnert P. M. 2006. Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Austral Ecol 31:647655.
[Cal-IPC] California Invasive Plant Council 2006. California Invasive Plant Inventory. Berkeley Cal-IPC Publication 2006-02. 39 p.
Cione N. K., Padgett P. E., and Allen E. B. 2002. Restoration of a native shrubland impacted by exotic grasses, frequent fire, and nitrogen deposition in southern California. Restor. Ecol 10:376384.
Coates P. 2007. American perceptions of immigrant and invasive species: strangers on the land. Berkeley University of California Press.
Daehler C. C., Denslow J. S., Ansari S., and Kuo H. 2004. A risk-assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conserv. Biol 18:360368.
DiTomaso J. M. 1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol 12:236336.
DiTomaso J. M. 2008. Integration of biological control into weed management strategies. Pages 649654. In Julien M. H., Sforza R., Bon M. C., Evans H. C., Hatcher P. E., Hinz H. L., and Rector B. G. eds. Proceedings of the XI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Wallingford, UK CAB International and Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DiTomaso J. M. and Healy E. A. 2007. Weeds of California and Other Western States. Davis, CA University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3488. 1806 p.
DiTomaso J. M. and Johnson D. W. 2006. The use of fire as a tool for controlling invasive plants. Berkeley California Invasive Plant Council Publication 2006-01. 56 p.
DiTomaso J. M., Kyser G. B., Miller J. R., Garcia S., Smith R. F., Nader G., Connor J. M., and Orloff S. B. 2006a. Integrating prescribed burning and clopyralid for the management of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Sci 54:757782.
DiTomaso J. M., Kyser G. B., and Pitcairn M. J. 2006b. Yellow Starthistle Management Guide. Berkeley California Invasive Plant Council Publication 2006-03. 65 p.
Dukes J. S. and Mooney H. A. 2004. Disruption of ecosystem processes in western North America by invasive species. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat 77:411437.
Eagle A. J., Eiswerth M. E., Johnson W. S., Schoenig S. E., and van Kooten G. C. 2007. Costs and losses imposed on California ranchers by yellow starthistle. Range. Ecol. Manag 60:369377.
Eiswerth M. E., Singletary L., Zimmerman J. R., and Johnson W. S. 2005. Dynamic benefit–cost analysis for controlling perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium): a case study. Weed Technol 19:237243.
Erskine Ogden J. and Rejmanek M. 2005. Recovery of native plant communities after the control of a dominant invasive plant species, Foeniculum vulgare: implications for management. Biol. Conserv 125:427439.
Fenn M. E., Baron J. S., Allen E. B., et al. 2003. Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the Western United States. Bioscience 53:404420.
Finnoff D., Shogren J. F., Leung B., and Lodge D. 2007. Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological invaders. Ecol. Econ 62:216222.
Gelbard J. L. and Belnap J. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv. Biol 17:420432.
Gelbard J. L. and Harrison S. 2005. Invasibility of roadless grasslands: an experimental study of yellow starthistle. Ecol. Appl 15:15701580.
Gordon D. R. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol. Appl 8:975989.
Gordon D. R., Onderdonk D. A., Fox A. M., Stocker R. K., and Gantz C. 2008. Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian weed risk assessment. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:178195.
Harrison S. P. and Viers J. H. 2007. Serpentine Grasslands. Pages 145155. In Stromberg M. R., Corbin J. D., and D'Antonio C. M. eds. California Grasslands: Ecology and Management. Berkeley University of California Press.
Hobbs R. J. and Harris J. A. 2001. Restoration ecology: repairing the earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor. Ecol 9:239246.
Hrusa F., Ertter B., Sanders A., Leppig G., and Dean E. 2002. Catalogue of non-native vascular plants occurring spontaneously in California beyond those addressed in the Jepson manual, part 1. Madrono 49:6198.
Klinger R. K. 2007. Review of American perceptions of immigrant and invasive species: strangers on the land. Madrono 54:363365.
Knapp P. A. 1996. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) dominance in the Great Basin Desert: history, persistence, and influences to human activities. Global Environ. Change 6:3752.
Kowarik I. 2003. Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biol. Invasions 5:293312.
Kŕivánek M. and Pyšek P. 2006. Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic. Divers. Distrib 12:319327.
Larson B. 2005. The war on roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Front. Ecol. Environ 3:495500.
Mack R. N., Simberloff D., Lonsdale W. M., Evans H., Clout M., and Bazzaz F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689710.
Marty J. T. 2005. Effects of cattle grazing on diversity in ephemeral wetlands. Conserv. Biol 19:16261632.
Meimberg H., Hammond J. I., Jorgensen C. M., Park T. W., Gerlach J. D., Rice K. J., and McKay J. K. 2006. Molecular evidence for an extreme genetic bottleneck during introduction of an invading grass to California. Biol. Invasions 8:13551366.
Millar C. I., Stephenson N. L., and Stephens S. L. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol. Appl 17:21452151.
National Invasive Species Council 2007. 2008–2012 National Invasive Species Management Plan: Draft for Public Comment. Washington, DC National Invasive Species Council. 32 p.
Norgaard K. M. 2007. The politics of invasive weed management: gender, race, and risk perception in rural California. Rural Sociol 72:450477.
Parendes L. A. and Jones J. A. 2000. Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Conserv. Biol 14:6475.
Pheloung P. C., Williams P. A., and Halloy S. R. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manag 57:239251.
Phillips S. J., Anderson R. P., and Schapire R. E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model 190:231259.
Pimentel D., Lach L., Zeniga R., and Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:5365.
Pimentel D., Zuniga R., and Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ 52:273288.
Pysek P., Richardson D. M., and Jarosik V. 2006. Who cites who in the invasion zoo: insights from an analysis of the most highly cited papers in invasion ecology. Preslia (Prague) 78:437468.
Rejmanek M., Thomsen C. D., and Peters I. D. 1991. Invasive vascular plants of California. Pages 81101. In Groves R. H. and Di Castri F. eds. Biogeography of Mediterranean Invasions. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
Rogers C. E. and McCarty J. P. 2000. Climate change and ecosystems of the mid-Atlantic Region. Clim. Res 14:235244.
Schoenig S. ed. 2005. California Noxious and Invasive Weed Action Plan. Sacramento, CA California Department of Food and Agriculture and California Invasive Weed Awareness Coalition. 45 p.
Seastedt T. R., Hobbs R. J., and Suding K. N. 2008. Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front. Ecol. Environ 6:547555.
Senseman S. A. ed. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 403 p.
Sheppard A. W., Hill R., DeClerck-Floate R. A., McCIay A., Olckers T., Quimby P. C. Jr, and Zimmermann H. G. 2003. A global review of risk-benefit-cost analysis for the introduction of classical biological control agents against weeds: a crisis in the making? Biocontrol News Inf 24:91N108N.
Shogren J. F. and Tschirhart J. 2005. Integrating ecology and economics to address bioinvasions. Ecol. Econ 52:267271.
Sutherst R. W. 2003. Prediction of species geographical ranges. J. Biogeogr 30:805816.
Sutherst R. W., Maywald G. F., Yonow T., and Stevens P. M. 1999. CLIMEX: predicting the effects of climate on plants and animals. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). 89 p.
Theoharides K. A. and Dukes J. S. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176:256273.
Trombulak S. C. and Frissell C. A. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv. Biol 14:1830.
Trowbridge W. B. 2007. The role of stochasticity and priority effects in floodplain restoration. Ecol. Appl 17:13121324.
Underwood E. C., Klinger R., and Moore P. E. 2004. Predicting patterns of non-native plant invasions in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Divers. Distrib 10:447459.
Weiss S. B. 2006. Impacts of nitrogen deposition on California ecosystems and biodiversity. Santa Barbara California Energy Commission and PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research CEC-500-2005-165.
Williams S. L. and Grosholz E. D. 2008. The invasive species challenge in estuarine and coastal environments: marrying management and science. Estuaries Coasts 31:320.
Williamson J. and Harrison S. 2002. Biotic and abiotic limits to the spread of exotic revegetation species. Ecol. Appl 12:4051.
Zavaleta E. S. 2000. Valuing ecosystem services lost to Tamarix invasion in the United States. Pages 262299. In Mooney H. A. and Hobbs R. J. eds. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Covelo, CA Island Press.
Zedler J. B. and Kercher S. 2005. Water resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res 30:3974.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Abstract views

Total abstract views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.