Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Effect of Biological Control on Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) and Diversity of Associated Grasslands Over 14 Years

  • Peter Lesica (a1) and Dave Hanna (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Using biological control agents to restore native habitats degraded by exotic plants should decrease the abundance of the invaders but should also result in a return toward preinvasion levels of native diversity. However, there are few long-term studies documenting changes in native biological diversity with the decline of an invader. We introduced a biocontrol flea beetle into three Montana grassland sites dominated by leafy spurge and monitored changes in leafy spurge abundance and frequency of associated vascular plants in 48 permanent microplots, in a 530 or 1,960 m2 macroplot immediately before and 14 yr after the release. Density and mass of leafy spurge declined 60 and 69%, respectively, over the 14 yr of the study across the three sites. Total species richness increased by 1.2 species/microplot (21%) between 1994 and 2008 across all three sites, but the increase differed among sites. Mean richness of exotic species was virtually unchanged across the three sites over the course of the study. Graminoid species richness was virtually unchanged across the three sites over the course of the study; most of the increase in diversity was due to the increase in forb richness at all three sites. Release of the biocontrol insects and a subsequent large reduction of leafy spurge were associated with an increase in native diversity after 14 yr, although causality cannot be confidently inferred from these associations because there were no controls. The increase in native diversity was small relative to the decline in leafy spurge abundance, suggesting that significant increases of native alpha diversity in semiarid grasslands may require many decades. Our results also suggest that the response to a decline of an invading species may depend on site quality and history.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: peter.lesica@mso.umt.edu
References
Hide All
G. L. Anderson , E. S. Delfosse , N. R. Spencer , C. W. Prosser , and R. D. Richard 2003. Lessons in developing successful invasive weed control programs. J. Range Manage 56:212.

J. W. Belcher and S. D. Wilson 1989. Leafy spurge and the species composition of a mixed- grass prairie. J. Range Manage 42:172175.

R. T. Bush , T. R. Seastedt , and D. Buckner 2007. Plant community response to the decline of diffuse knapweed in a Colorado grassland. Ecol. Restor 25:169174.

C. L. Campbell and P. P. McAffrey 1991. Population trends, seasonal phenology and impact of Chrysolina quadrigemina, C. hyperici (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and Agrilus hyperici (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) associated with Hypericum perforatum in northern Idaho. Environ. Entomol 20:303315.

D. N. Cole and P. B. Landres 1996. Threats to wilderness ecosystems: impacts and research needs. Ecol. Appl 6:168184.

A. Gassmann , D. Schroeder , E. Maw , and G. Sommer 1996. Biology, ecology and host specificity of European Aphthona spp. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) used as biocontrol agents for leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula (Euphorbiaceae) in North America. Biol. Control 6:105113.

P. Harris 1988. Environmental impact of weed-control insects. BioScience 38:542548.

R. J. Hobbs and D. A. Norton 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol 4:93110.

M. S. Hoddle 2004. Restoring balance: using exotic species to control invasive exotic species. Conserv. Biol 18:3849.

C. B. Huffaker and C. E. Kennett 1959. A ten-year study of vegetational changes associated with biological control of Klamath weed. J. Range Manage 12:6982.

I. D. Jonsen , R. S. Bourchier , and J. Roland 2001. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Oecologia 127:287294.

W. R. Jordan , R. L. Peters , and E. B. Allen 1988. Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity. Environ. Manage 12:5572.

P. Lesica and D. Hanna 2004. Indirect effects of biological control on plant diversity vary across sites in Montana grasslands. Conserv. Biol 18:444454.

R. N. Mack , D. Simberloff , D. M. Lonsdale , H. Evans , M. Clout , and F. A. Bazzaz 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689710.

R. E. McFayden 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol 43:369393.

V. C. Moran , J. H. Hoffman , and H. G. Zimmermenn 2005. Biological control of invasive alien plants in South Africa: necessity, circumspection, and success. Front. Ecol. Environ 3:7783.

R. W. Pemberton 2000. Predictable risk to native plants in weed biological control. Oecologia 125:489494.

A. Stewart-Oaten 1995. Rules and judgements in statistics: three examples. Ecology 76:20012009.

D. Tilman 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:8192.

S. D. Wilson and D. Tilman 2002. Quadratic variation in old-field species richness along gradients of disturbance and nitrogen. Ecology 83:492504.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 60 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.