Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Forecasting Weed Distributions using Climate Data: A GIS Early Warning Tool

  • Catherine S. Jarnevich (a1), Tracy R. Holcombe (a1), David T. Barnett (a2), Thomas J. Stohlgren (a1) and John T. Kartesz (a3)...

Abstract

The number of invasive exotic plant species establishing in the United States is continuing to rise. When prevention of exotic species from entering into a country fails at the national level and the species establishes, reproduces, spreads, and becomes invasive, the most successful action at a local level is early detection followed by eradication. We have developed a simple geographic information system (GIS) analysis for developing watch lists for early detection of invasive exotic plants that relies upon currently available species distribution data coupled with environmental data to aid in describing coarse-scale potential distributions. This GIS analysis tool develops environmental envelopes for species based upon the known distribution of a species thought to be invasive and represents the first approximation of its potential habitat while the necessary data are collected to perform more in-depth analyses. To validate this method we looked at a time series of species distributions for 66 species in Pacific Northwest and northern Rocky Mountain counties. The time series analysis presented here did select counties that the invasive exotic weeds invaded in subsequent years, showing that this technique could be useful in developing watch lists for the spread of particular exotic species. We applied this same habitat-matching model based upon bioclimatic envelopes to 100 invasive exotics with various levels of known distributions within continental U.S. counties. For species with climatically limited distributions, county watch lists describe county-specific vulnerability to invasion. Species with matching habitats in a county would be added to that county's list. These watch lists can influence management decisions for early warning, control prioritization, and targeted research to determine specific locations within vulnerable counties. This tool provides useful information for rapid assessment of the potential distribution based upon climate envelopes of current distributions for new invasive exotic species.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: jarnevichc@usgs.gov

References

Hide All
Barnett, D. T., Stohlgren, T. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Chong, G. W., Ericson, J. A., Davern, T. R., and Simonson, S. E. 2007. The art and science of weed mapping. Environ. Monit. Assess 132:235252.
Brotons, L., Thuiller, W., Araujo, M. B., and Hirzel, A. H. 2004. Presence–absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability. Ecography 27:437448.
Caley, P. and Kuhnert, P. 2006. Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Austral. Ecol 31:647655.
Crooks, J. A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316329.
Crossman, N. D. and Bass, D. A. 2008. Application of common predictive habitat techniques for post-border weed risk management. Divers. Distrib 14:213224.
Daly, C., Taylor, G. H., Gibson, W. P., Parzybok, T. W., Johnson, G. L., and Pasteris, P. A. 2000. High-quality spatial climate data sets for the United States and beyond. Trans. ASAE (Am. Soc. Agric. Eng.) 43:19571962.
Elith, J., Graham, C. H., Anderson, R. P., Dudik, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R. J., Huettmann, F., Leathwick, J. R., Lehmann, A., Li, J., Lohmann, L. G., Loiselle, B. A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J. M., Peterson, A. T., Phillips, S. J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R. E., Soberon, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M. S., and Zimmermann, N. E. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129151.
Evangelista, P., Kumar, S., Stohlgren, T. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Crall, A. W., Norman, J. B. III, and Barnett, D. 2008. Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Divers. Distrib 14:808817.
Ficetola, G. F., Thuiller, W., and Miaud, C. 2007. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic alien invasive species—the American bullfrog. Divers. Distrib 13:476485.
Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv 24:3849.
Gibson, L., Barrett, B., and Burbidge, A. 2007. Dealing with uncertain absences in habitat modelling: a case study of a rare ground-dwelling parrot. Divers. Distrib 13:704713.
Hijmans, R. J. 2006. Worldclim. http://worldclim.org/bioclim.htm. Accessed: February 29, 2008.
Hirzel, A. H., Helfer, V., and Metral, F. 2001. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol. Model 145:111121.
Hortal, J., Jimenez-Valverde, A., Gomez, J. F., Lobo, J. M., and Baselga, A. 2008. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. Oikos 117:847858.
Kartesz, J. T. 2004. Biota of North America Program County Weed Database. Biota of North America Program. Chapel Hill, NC North Carolina Botanical Garden.
Kartesz, J. T. 2007. Biota of North America Program County Weed Database. Biota of North America Program. Chapel Hill, NC North Carolina Botanical Garden.
Krivanek, M. and Pysek, P. 2006. Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central Europe). Divers. Distrib 12:319327.
Levine, J. M. and D'Antonio, C. M. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv. Biol 17:322326.
Lodge, D., Williams, S., MacIsaac, H. J., Hayes, K. R., Leung, B., Reichard, S. H., Mack, R. N., Moyle, P. B., Smith, M., Andow, D. A., Carlton, J. T., and McMichael, A. 2006. Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. Ecol. Appl 16:20352054.
Loiselle, B. A., Jorgensen, P. M., Consiglio, T., Jimenez, I., Blake, J. G., Lohmann, L. G., and Montiel, O. M. 2008. Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? J. Biogeogr 35:105116.
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl 10:689710.
National Institute of Invasive Species Science 2008. National Institute of Invasive Species Science. http://www.niiss.org. Accessed: February 29, 2008.
Nix, H. 1986. A biogeographic analysis of Australian elapid snakes. Pages 415. In Longmore, R. ed. Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia. Canberra Australian Government Publishing Service.
North American Weed Management Association 2002. North American invasive plant mapping standards. http://www.nawma.org. Accessed: November 1, 2007.
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ 52:273288.
PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University 2007. PRISM Climate Group. http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed: February 2008.
Rejmanek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal?. Pages 249253. In Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N. eds. Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK IUCN Species Survival Commission Invasive Species Specialist Group.
Rice, P. M. 2006. INVADERS Database System. http://invader.dbs.umt.edu. Accessed: August 29, 2006.
Richardson, D. M. and Thuiller, W. 2007. Home away from home—objective mapping of high-risk source areas for plant introductions. Divers. Distrib 13:299312.
Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Milton, S. J., and Polakow, D. 2001. Predicting invasion dynamics of four alien Pinus species in a highly fragmented semi-arid shrubland in South Africa. Plant Ecol 152:7992.
Stohlgren, T. J., Barnett, D. T., Jarnevich, C. S., Flather, C., and Kartesz, J. 2008. The myth of plant species saturation. Ecol. Lett 11:313326.
Stohlgren, T. J. and Schnase, J. L. 2006. Risk analysis for biological hazards: what we need to know about invasive species. Risk Anal 26:163173.
University of Conneticut 2007. Invasive Plant Atlas of England. Available at: http://nbii-nin.ciesin.columbia.edu/ipane/. Accessed November 10, 2007.
Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, R. C., Loope, L., and Westbrooks, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci 84:468478.
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., and Losos, E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607615.
Work, T. T., McCullough, D. G., Cavey, J. F., and Komsa, R. 2005. Arrival rate of nonindigenous insect species into the United States through foreign trade. Biol. Invasions 7:323332.
Zaniewski, A. E., Lehmann, A., and Overton, J. M. C. 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. Ecol. Model 157:261280.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed