Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Land Manager and Researcher Perspectives on Invasive Plant Research Needs in the Midwestern United States

  • Mark Renz (a1), Kevin D. Gibson (a2), Jennifer Hillmer (a3), Katherine M. Howe (a4), Donald M. Waller (a5) and John Cardina (a6)...
Abstract

In 2006, the Midwest Invasive Plant Network's Research Committee conducted a web-based survey to help identify research needs and interactions between land managers and researchers working to manage invasive plants in the Midwest. Of 192 responses, 30% identified themselves as researchers and 70% identified themselves as managers. Researchers and managers rated working together on invasive plant issues as high or medium in importance, but neither group rated the current level of cooperation as high, with over 90% describing current cooperation as low or medium. Both groups self-associate, with 89% of researchers working with other researchers and 77% of managers working with other managers. “Lack of time” and “lack of money” were the main issues limiting researchers and land managers from working more closely together: money was a greater constraint for researchers and time was more important for land managers. To help researchers and land managers work more effectively together, both groups favored opportunities to develop research-based projects at land managers' sites, with funding from a cooperative grant program. Open-ended responses suggest that on-site experiments and demonstrations of management methods could help researchers and land managers interact more effectively. Researchers rated basic biology as more important than land managers did, but neither group judged testing theories of invasion as a high priority. “Social/political factors” and “risk assessment” were viewed as less important despite their clear relevance in the introduction and spread of invasive plants.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: cardina.2@osu.edu
References
Hide All
Baker, H. G. 1965. Characteristics and mode of origin of weeds. Pages 147172. in Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L., editors. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. New York Academic.
Barney, J. N. and Whitlow, T. H. 2008. A unifying framework for biological invasions: the state factor model. Biol. Invasions 10:259272.
Berry, J., Brewer, G. D., Gordon, J. C., and Patton, D. R. 1998. Closing the gap between ecosystem management and ecosystem research. Policy Sci 31:5580.
Blumenthal, D. 2005. Interrelated causes of plant invasion. Science 310:243244.
DeGasperis, B. G. and Motzkin, G. 2007. Windows of opportunity: historical and ecological controls on Berberis thunbergii invasions. Ecology 88:31153125.
Foxcroft, L. C. 2004. An adaptive management framework for linking science and management of invasive alien plants. Weed Technol 18:12751277.
Gagliardi, J. A. and Brand, M. H. 2007. Connecticut nursery and landscape industry preferences for solutions to the sale and use of invasive plants. Hort. Technol 17:3945.
Hierro, J. L., Maron, J. L., and Callaway, R. M. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. J. Ecol 95:515.
Kelley, K. M., Conklin, J. R., Sellmer, J. C., and Bates, R. M. 2006. Invasive plant species: results of a consumer awareness, knowledge, and expectations survey conducted in Pennsylvania. J. Environ. Hortic 24:5358.
Leung, B., Lodge, D. M., Finnoff, D., Shogren, F. F., and Lewis, M. A. 2002. An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc. Biol. Sci 269:24072413.
Levine, J. M., Vila, M., D'Antonio, C. M., Dukes, J. S., Grigulis, K., and Lavorel, S. 2002. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond 270:775781.
Luken, J. O. and Seastedt, T. R. 2004. Management of plant invasions: the conflict of perspective. Weed Technol 18:15141517.
McPherson, G. R. 2004. Linking science and management to mitigate impacts of nonnative plants. Weed Technol 18:11851188.
Peters, W. L., Meyer, M. H., and Anderson, N. O. 2006. Minnesota horticulture industry survey on invasive plants. Euphytica 248:7586.
SAS 2002. SAS User's Guide. Version 9.1. Cary, NC SAS Institute.
Von Holle, B. and Motzkin, G. 2007. Historical land use and environmental determinants of nonnative plant distribution in coastal southern New England. Biol. Conserv 136:3343.
Wittenberg, R. and Cock, M. J. W. 2005. Best practices for the prevention and management of invasive alien species. Pages 209232. in Mooney, H. A., et al, editor. Invasive Alien Species: A New Synthesis. Covelo, CA Island Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 21st April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.