Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:59:47.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential Invasiveness for Eucalyptus Species in Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kimberly A. Lorentz
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, 155 Research Road, Quincy FL 32351
Patrick J. Minogue*
Affiliation:
School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, 155 Research Road, Quincy FL 32351
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pminogue@ufl.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To assess the potential invasiveness of common eucalyptus species planted for pulpwood, mulch wood or bioenergy crops, field surveys of eucalyptus seedling recruitment were conducted in north and central Florida locations within seed bearing eucalyptus stands and in the proximate plant communities where seed dispersal may occur. Plant communities included non-grazed pasture, intensively site-prepared forestland, abandoned forest road and upland mixed pine- hardwood forest. No eucalyptus seedlings were found in any of the 310 1-m2 survey plots across the two locations. Second, seed addition studies were conducted to determine the relative potential for seedling emergence and survival among Eucalyptus amplifolia, E. camaldulensis and E. grandis added into plots at two seed densities, under disturbed and nondisturbed conditions, in the understory of the eucalyptus stands and in each of the aforementioned proximate plant communities. Overall, the probability of emergence of added seed was very low (P = 0.0 to 0.0032), and seed density effects were not significant. Emergence was significantly greater in disturbed conditions compared to nondisturbed conditions for seedlings originating from natural seed rain from the eucalyptus canopy in central Florida. The amount of time that seedlings survived was greater for E. camaldulensis compared to the other species but no seedlings survived more than 13 wk. These data indicate that under specific favorable conditions, eucalyptus seedlings may establish within or proximate to planted stands, but the overall level of invasiveness demonstrated by E. amplifolia and E. grandis is low for north or central Florida. The demonstrated role of disturbance in facilitating eucalyptus seedling recruitment suggests that a stable perennial plant community (native grasses) should be established instead of bare soil buffer zones to mitigate spread.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

References

Literature Cited

Barney, JN, DiTomaso, JM (2008) Nonnative species and bioenergy: Are we cultivating the next invader? Bioscience 58:17 Google Scholar
Boland, DJ (1986) Testing and storage of Eucalyptus and Acacia seed. Pages 7594 in Proceedings of a Workshop on Seed Handling and Eucalypt Taxonomy. Harare, Zimbabwe Forestry Commission of Zimbabwe and the International Development Research Centre (Canada) Google Scholar
Booth, TH (2013) Eucalypts and their potential for invasiveness particularly in frost-prone regions. Int J For Res. DOI: 10.1155/2012/837165Google Scholar
Callaham, MA Jr, Stanturf, JA, Hammond, WJ, Rockwood, DL, Wenk, ES, O'Brien, JJ (2013) Survey to evaluate escape of Eucalyptus spp. seedlings from plantations in Southeastern USA. Int J For Res. DOI: 10.1155/2013/946374Google Scholar
Chimera, CG, Buddenhagen, CE, Clifford, PM (2010) Biofuels: the risks and the dangers of introducing invasive species. Biofuels 1:785–596Google Scholar
Cremer, KW (1977) Distance of seed dispersal in eucalypts estimated from seed weights. Aust For Restor 7:225228 Google Scholar
Cremer, KW (1966) Dissemination of seed from Eucalyptus regnans . Australian Forestry 30:3337 Google Scholar
da Silva, PHM, Poggiani, F, Sebbenn, AM, Mori, ES (2011) Can Eucalyptus invade native forest fragments close to commercial stands? Forest Ecol Manag 26:20752080 Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Cousens, RD, Hill, J, Mack, RN, Simberloff, D, Raghu, S (2010) Screening bioenergy feedstock crops to mitigate invasion risk. Frontiers Ecol Environ 8:533539 Google Scholar
Elton, CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London Methuen.Google Scholar
Emer, C, Fonseca, CR (2010) Araucaria forest conservation: mechanisms providing resistance to invasion by exotic timber trees. Biol Invasion 13:189202 Google Scholar
Ewel, JJ, O'Dowd, DJ, Bergelson, J, Daehler, CC, D'Antonio, CM, Gómez, LD, Gordon, DR, Hobbs, RJ, Holt, A, Hopper, KR, Hughes, CE, LaHart, M, Leakey, RRB, Lee, WG, Loope, LL, Lorence, DH, Louda, SM, Lugo, AE, McEvoy, PB, Richardson, DM, Vitousek, PM (1999) Deliberate introductions of species: research needs. Bioscience 49:619–30Google Scholar
Flory, SL, Lorentz, KA, Gordon, DR, Sollenberger, LE (2012) Experimental approaches for evaluating the invasion risk of biofuel crops. Environ Res Lett. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/045904Google Scholar
Gordon, DR, Flory, SL, Cooper, AL, Morris, SK (2012) Assessing the invasion risk of Eucalyptus in the United States using the Australian weed risk assessment. Int J For Res. DOI: 10.1155/2012/203768Google Scholar
Gordon, DR, Tancig, KJ, Onderdonk, DA, Gantz, CA (2011) Assessing the invasive potential of biofuel species proposed for Florida and the United States using the Australian weed risk assessment. Biomass Bioenerg 35:7479 Google Scholar
Hulme, PE (2011) Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? J Appl Ecol. 49:1029 Google Scholar
[IFAS] Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (2012) Florida Automated Weather Network. http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/. Accessed: January 10, 2013Google Scholar
Le Maitre, DC, van Wilgen, BW, Gelderblom, CM, Bailey, C, Chapman, RA, Nel, JA (2002) Invasive alien trees and water resources in South Africa: case studies of the costs and benefits of management. For Ecol Manag 160:143159 Google Scholar
Leung, B, Lodge, DM, Finnoff, D, Shogren, JF, Lewis, MA, Lamberti, G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:24072413 Google Scholar
Lockwood, JL, Cassey, P, Blackburn, T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–8Google Scholar
Lowery, RF, Gjerstad, DH (1991) Chemical and mechanical site preparation. Pages 251261 in Duryea, ML, Dougherty, PM, eds. Forest Regeneration Manual. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Google Scholar
McCormick, N, Howard, G (2013) Beating back biofuel crop invasions: Guidelines on managing the invasion risk of biofuel developments. Renew Energ 49:263266 Google Scholar
McCullagh, P, Nelder, JA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 37. Second edition. Boca Raton, FL Chapman & Hall/CRC. 511 ppGoogle Scholar
Minton, MS, Mack, RN (2010) Naturalization of plant populations: the role of cultivation and population size and density. Oecologia 164:399409 Google Scholar
[NMOC] Naval Meteorology andOceanography Command (2012) Complete sun and moon data for one day: U.S. Cities and Towns. Stennis Space Center, MS. http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/RS_OneDay.php. Accessed: May 15, 2012Google Scholar
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2002) Monthly station normals of temperature, precipitation, and heating and cooling degree days 1971–2000. in Climatography of the United States, No. 81.08–Florida. Asheville, NC NOAA National Climatic Data Center and National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service. http://cdo.ncdc.noaa.gov/climatenormals/clim81/FLnorm.pdf. Accessed: June 10, 2011Google Scholar
Pagni, PJ (1993) Causes of the 20 October 1991 Oakland Hills conflagration. Fire Safety J 2:331339 Google Scholar
Parker, IM, Kareiva, P (1996) Assessing the risks of invasion for genetically engineered plants: acceptable evidence and reasonable doubt. Biol Conserv 78:196208 Google Scholar
Pheloung, PC, Williams, PA, Halloy, SR (1999) A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J Environ Manage 57:239251 Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M, Richardson, DM (2011) Eucalypts. In Simberloff, D, Rejmánek, M, eds. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions. Berkeley, CA University of California Press, 203209 Google Scholar
Richardson, DM, Rejmánek, M (2011) Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Divers Distrib 17:788809 Google Scholar
Rockwood, DL (2012) History and Status of Eucalyptus Improvement in Florida. Int J For Res. DOI: 10.1155/2012/607879Google Scholar
Sax, DF (2002) Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages: a comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California. Global Ecol Biogeog 11:4957 Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (2012) Plant Hardiness Zone Map. http://planthardiness.ars.usda.gov/PHZMWeb/. Accessed: January 10, 2013Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (2008) Agriculture Handbook 727. The Woody Plant Seed Manual. Pp. 504512 Google Scholar
Virtue, JG, Melland, RL (2003) The environmental weed risk of revegetation and forestry plants. Adelaide, South Australia Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation Report DWLBS2003/02. 184 pGoogle Scholar
Wellington, AB, Noble, IR (1985) Seed dynamics and factors limiting recruitment of mMallee Eucalyptus incrassata in semi-arid, south-eastern Australia. J Ecol 73:657666 Google Scholar
Wevill, T, Read, J (2010) Fine-scale patterns in the distribution of semi-arid tree species at Wyperfeld National Park, southeastern Australia – the potential roles of resource gradients vs. disturbance. J Arid Environ 74:482490 Google Scholar