Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Progress toward Environmental Weed Eradication in New Zealand

  • Clayson J. Howell (a1)
Abstract

Data on 111 environmental weed eradication programs carried out by the New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) have been collected and summarized. A total of 21 programs were discontinued, and 90 are ongoing. Within the ongoing programs, four have been successful in that no plants remain at any known infestations. All four of the successful eradications had a total area across all infestations of less than 1 ha (2.5 ac); however, many similar-sized programs were not successful. Correctly assessing the extent of infestations appears to be a major problem for discontinued programs. Some of the ongoing programs are progressing toward eradication, but this is taking much longer than initially anticipated. The strongest determinant of progress toward eradication was found to be the identity of the DOC administrative area, for reasons that are only speculative. The number and area of initial infestations had no effect on progress toward eradication. However, the rate at which new infestations were located was negatively correlated with progress. Across many programs, progress was restricted by inconsistent infestation visitation. After running for a decade, DOC's weed eradication strategy has yet to provide significant dividends. Environmental weed eradication is clearly more difficult than has previously been acknowledged in New Zealand.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: chowell@doc.govt.nz
References
Hide All
Buddenhagen, C. E. 2006. The successful eradication of two blackberry species Rubus megalococcus and R. adenotrichos (Rosaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos, Ecuador. Pacific Conserv. Biol. 12:272278.
Cacho, O. J. 2004. When is it optimal to eradicate a weed invasion? Pages 4954 in Proceedings of the 14th Australian Weeds Conference. Sydney, Australia Weeds Society of New South Wales.
Cacho, O. J., Spring, D., Pheloung, P., and Hester, S. 2006. Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biol. Invasions 8:903917.
Crooks, J. A. and Soule, M. E. 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: Causes and implications. Pages 103125 in Sunderland, O. T., Schei, P. J., and Viken, A., eds. Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic.
Cunningham, D. C., Barry, S. C., Woldendorp, G., and Burgess, M. B. 2004. A framework for prioritizing sleeper weeds for eradication. Weed Technol. 18:11891193.
Dodd, J. 1990. The role of ecological studies in assessing weed eradication programs. Pages 416426 in Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds conference. Glen Osmond, SA, Australia Crop Science Society of South Australia.
Harris, S. and Timmins, S. M. 2009. Estimating the Benefit of Early Control of all Newly Naturalised Plants: Science for Conservation 292. Wellington, New Zealand Department of Conservation. 25 p.
Hester, S. M., Odom, D. I. S., Cacho, O. J., and Sinden, J. A. 2004. Eradication of Exotic Weeds in Australia: Comparing Effort and Expenditure—Working Paper Series in Agricultural and Resource Economics. Biddeford, ME University of New England. 18 p.
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 1994. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9:761770.
Holloran, P. 2006. Measuring performance of invasive plant eradication efforts in New Zealand. N. Z. Plant Prot. 59:17.
Howell, C. 2008. Consolidated List of Environmental Weeds in New Zealand: DOC Research and Development Series 292. Wellington, New Zealand Department of Conservation. 42 p.
Mack, R. N. and Foster, S. K. 2009. Eradicating plant invaders: combining ecologically based tactics and broad-sense strategy. Pages 3560 in Inderjit, . ed. Management of Invasive Weeds. Heidelberg, Germany Springer.
Mack, R. N. and Lonsdale, W. M. 2002. Eradicating invasive plants: Hard won lessons for Islands. Pages 164172 in Veitch, C. R., and Clout, M. N., eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK IUCN.
Morfe, T. A. and Weiss, J. 2006. Optimising government investment at different stages of the weed invasion process. Pages 8790 in Proceedings of the 15th Australian Weeds Conference. Adelaide Weed Management Society of South Australia.
Myers, J. and Bazely, D. 2003. Ecology and control of introduced plants. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 313 p.
Myers, J. H., Savoie, A., and van Randen, E. 1998. Eradication and pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34:471491.
Myers, J. H., Simberloff, D., Kuris, A. M., and Carey, J. R. 2000. Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15(8):316320.
Olson, L. J. and Roy, S. 2002. The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84(5):13111316.
Owen, S. J. 1997. Ecological Weeds on Conservation Land in New Zealand: a database—January 1997 Working Draft. Wellington, New Zealand Department of Conservation. 67 p.
Owen, S. J. 1998. Department of Conservation Strategic Plan for Managing Invasive Weeds. Wellington, New Zealand Department of Conservation. 86 p.
Panetta, F. D. 2007. Evaluation or weed eradication programs: containment and extirpation. Divers. Distrib. 13:3341.
Panetta, F. D. 2009. Weed eradication—An economic perspective. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2(4):360368.
Panetta, F. D. and Brooks, S. J. 2008. Evaluating progress in weed eradication programs. Pages 418420 in Proceedings of the 16th Australian Weeds Conference. Brisbane Queensland Weeds Society.
Panetta, F. D. and Lawes, R. M. 2005. Evaluation of weed eradication programs: the delimitation of extent. Divers. Distrib. 11:435442.
Panetta, F. D. and Lawes, R. M. 2007. Evaluation of the Australian branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) eradication program. Weed Sci. 55:644651.
Panetta, F. D. and Timmins, S. M. 2004. Evaluating the feasibility of eradication for terrestrial weed incursions. Plant Prot. Q. 19:511.
Parkes, J. P. and Panetta, F. D. 2009. Eradication of pests and weeds: progress and emerging issues in the 21st century. Pages 4760 in Clout, M. N., and Williams, P. A., eds. Invasive Species Management: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.
Rejmanek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? Pages 249259 in Veitch, C. R., and Clout, M. N., eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group.
Simberloff, D. 2001. Eradication of island invasives: practical actions results achieved. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(6):273274.
Simberloff, D. 2003. Eradications—preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Sci. 51:247253.
Therneau, T. M. and Atkinson, E. J. 1997. An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the RPART Routines. http://www.mayo.edu/hsr/techrpt/61.pdf. Accessed: Month DD, YYYY.
Wittenberg, R. and Cock, M. J. W. 2001. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, Oxon, UK CAB Intl. 215 p.
Woldendorp, G. and Bomford, M. 2004. Weed Eradication: Strategies, Timeframes and Costs. Canberra, Australia Bureau for Resource Sciences, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 30 p.
Zavaleta, E. 2000. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. Ambio 29(8):462467.
Zavaleta, E. S., Hobbs, R. J., and Mooney, H. A. 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(8):454459.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed