Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Progress toward Environmental Weed Eradication in New Zealand

  • Clayson J. Howell (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Data on 111 environmental weed eradication programs carried out by the New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC) have been collected and summarized. A total of 21 programs were discontinued, and 90 are ongoing. Within the ongoing programs, four have been successful in that no plants remain at any known infestations. All four of the successful eradications had a total area across all infestations of less than 1 ha (2.5 ac); however, many similar-sized programs were not successful. Correctly assessing the extent of infestations appears to be a major problem for discontinued programs. Some of the ongoing programs are progressing toward eradication, but this is taking much longer than initially anticipated. The strongest determinant of progress toward eradication was found to be the identity of the DOC administrative area, for reasons that are only speculative. The number and area of initial infestations had no effect on progress toward eradication. However, the rate at which new infestations were located was negatively correlated with progress. Across many programs, progress was restricted by inconsistent infestation visitation. After running for a decade, DOC's weed eradication strategy has yet to provide significant dividends. Environmental weed eradication is clearly more difficult than has previously been acknowledged in New Zealand.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail: chowell@doc.govt.nz
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. E. Buddenhagen 2006. The successful eradication of two blackberry species Rubus megalococcus and R. adenotrichos (Rosaceae) from Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos, Ecuador. Pacific Conserv. Biol. 12:272278.

O. J. Cacho , D. Spring , P. Pheloung , and S. Hester 2006. Evaluating the feasibility of eradicating an invasion. Biol. Invasions 8:903917.

J. A. Crooks and M. E. Soule 1999. Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: Causes and implications. Pages 103125 in O. T. Sunderland , P. J. Schei , and A. Viken , eds. Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht, The Netherlands Kluwer Academic.

D. C. Cunningham , S. C. Barry , G. Woldendorp , and M. B. Burgess 2004. A framework for prioritizing sleeper weeds for eradication. Weed Technol. 18:11891193.

R. J. Hobbs and S. E. Humphries 1994. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9:761770.

R. N. Mack and S. K. Foster 2009. Eradicating plant invaders: combining ecologically based tactics and broad-sense strategy. Pages 3560 in Inderjit . ed. Management of Invasive Weeds. Heidelberg, Germany Springer.

J. H. Myers , D. Simberloff , A. M. Kuris , and J. R. Carey 2000. Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15(8):316320.

L. J. Olson and S. Roy 2002. The economics of controlling a stochastic biological invasion. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84(5):13111316.

F. D. Panetta 2009. Weed eradication—An economic perspective. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2(4):360368.

F. D. Panetta and R. M. Lawes 2005. Evaluation of weed eradication programs: the delimitation of extent. Divers. Distrib. 11:435442.

F. D. Panetta and R. M. Lawes 2007. Evaluation of the Australian branched broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) eradication program. Weed Sci. 55:644651.

D. Simberloff 2001. Eradication of island invasives: practical actions results achieved. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(6):273274.

D. Simberloff 2003. Eradications—preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Sci. 51:247253.

E. Zavaleta 2000. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. Ambio 29(8):462467.

E. S. Zavaleta , R. J. Hobbs , and H. A. Mooney 2001. Viewing invasive species removal in a whole-ecosystem context. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16(8):454459.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.