Skip to main content

Using Rangeland Health Assessment to Inform Successional Management

  • Roger L. Sheley (a1), Jeremy J. James (a1), Edward A. Vasquez (a1) and Tony J. Svejcar (a1)

Rangeland health assessment provides qualitative information on ecosystem attributes. Successional management is a conceptual framework that allows managers to link information gathered in rangeland health assessment to ecological processes that need to be repaired to allow vegetation to change in a favorable direction. The objective of this paper is to detail how these two endeavors can be integrated to form a holistic vegetation management framework. The Rangeland Health Assessment procedures described by Pyke et al. (2002) and Pellant et al. (2005) currently are being adopted by land managers across the western United States. Seventeen standard indicators were selected to represent various ecological aspects of ecosystem health. Each of the indicators is rated from extreme to no (slight) departure from the Ecological Site Description and/or the Reference Area(s). Successional management identifies three general drivers of plant community change: site availability, species availability, and species performance, as well as specific ecological processes influencing these drivers. In this paper, we propose and provide examples of a method to link the information collected in rangeland health assessment to the successional management framework. Thus, this method not only allows managers to quantify a point-in-time indication of rangeland health but also allows managers to use this information to decide how various management options might influence vegetation trajectories. We argue that integrating the Rangeland Health Assessment with Successional Management enhances the usefulness of both systems and provides synergistic value to the decision-making process.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail:
Hide All
Baeten L., Jacquemyn H., Van Calster H., Van Beek E., Devlaeminck R., Verheyen K., and Hermy M. 2009. Low recruitment across life stages partly accounts for the slow colonization of forest herbs. J. Ecol. 97:109117.
Barnes B., Bi H. Q., and Roderick M. L. 2006. Application of an ecological framework linking scales based on self-thinning. Ecol. Appl. 16:133142.
Benkobi L., Trlica M. J., and Smith J. L. 1993. Soil Loss as Affected by Different Combinations of Surface Litter and Rock. J. Environ. Qual. 22:657661.
Bezemer T. M., Lawson C. S., Hedlund K., Edwards A. R., Brook A. J., Igual J. M., Mortimer S. R., and Van Der Putten W. H. 2006. Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant-soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J. Ecol. 94:893904.
Bischoff A., Warthemann G., and Klotz S. 2009. Succession of floodplain grasslands following reduction in land use intensity: the importance of environmental conditions, management and dispersal. J. Appl. Ecol. 46:241249.
Bonis A., Bouzille J. B., Amiaud B., and Loucougaray G. 2005. Plant community patterns in old embanked grasslands and the survival of halophytic flora. Flora 200:7487.
Breckenridge R. P., Kepner W. G., and Mouat D. A. 1995. A process for selecting indicators for monitoring conditions of rangeland health. Environ. Monit. Assess. 36:4560.
Briske D. D., Fuhlendorf S. D., and Smeins F. E. 2005. State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 58:110.
Burke A. 2008. The effect of topsoil treatment on the recovery of rocky plain and outcrop plant communities in Namibia. J. Arid Environ. 72:15311536.
Cairns J. 1993. Is restoration ecology practical? Restor. Ecol. 1:37.
Castro H. and Freitas H. 2009. Above-ground biomass and productivity in the Montado: from herbaceous to shrub dominated communities. J. Arid Environ. 73:506511.
Cerda A. 1999. Parent material and vegetation affect soil erosion in eastern Spain. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63:362368.
Clements F. E. 1916. Plant Succession. Washington, DC Carnegie Institute. 512 p.
Clewell A. and Rieger J. P. 1997. What practitioners need from restoration ecologists. Restor. Ecol. 5:350354.
Dodge R. S., Fule P. Z., and Sieg C. H. 2008. Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) response to wildfire in a southwestern USA forest. Ecoscience 15:213222.
Donath T. W. and Eckstein R. L. 2008. Grass and oak litter exert different effects on seedling emergence of herbaceous perennials from grasslands and woodlands. J. Ecol. 96:272280.
Dyksterhuis E. J. 1949. Condition and management of range land based on quantitative ecology. J. Range. Manage. 2:104115.
Dzwonko Z. and Loster S. 2008. Changes in plant species composition in abandoned and restored limestone grasslands - the effects of tree and shrub cutting. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 77:6775.
Egler F. E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts I. intitial florisitc composition, a factor in old-field development. Vegetatio 4:412417.
Foster B. L., Murphy C. A., Keller K. R., Aschenbach T. A., Questad E. J., and Kindscher K. 2007. Restoration of prairie community structure and ecosystem function in an abandoned hayfield: a sowing experiment. Restor. Ecol. 15:652661.
Gram W. K., Sork V. L., Marquis R. J., Renken R. B., Clawson R. L., Faaborg J., Fantz D. A., Le Corff J., Lill J., and Porneluzi P. A. 2001. Evaluating the effects of ecosystem management: a case study in a Missouri Ozark forest. Ecol. Appl. 11:16671679.
Galatowitsch S. M. 2006. Restoring prairie pothole wetlands: does the species pool concept offer decision-making guidance for re-vegetation? Appl. Veg. Sci. 9:261270.
Hobbs R. J. and Harris J. A. 2001. Restoration ecology: repairing the earth's damaged ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor. Ecol. 9:239246.
Hobbs R. J. and Norton D. A. 1996. Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 4:93110.
Holdaway R. J. and Sparrow A. D. 2006. Assembly rules operating along a primary riverbed-grassland successional sequence. J. Ecol. 94:10921102.
James J. J., Smith B. S., Vasquez E., and Sheley R. L. 2010. Principles for ecologically-based invasive plant management. Invasive Plant Sci. and Manag. 3:229239.
Kardol P., Van Der Wal A., Bezemer T. M., De Boer W., Duyts H., Holtkamp R., and Van Der Putten W. H. 2008. Restoration of species-rich grasslands on ex-arable land: Seed addition outweighs soil fertility reduction. Biol. Conserv. 141:22082217.
Knapp E. E. and Rice K. J. 2011. Effects of competition and temporal variation on the evolutionary potential of two native bunchgrass species. Restor. Ecol. 19:407417.
Koniak G. and Noy-Meir I. 2009. A hierarchical, multi-scale, management-responsive model of Mediterranean vegetation dynamics. Ecol. Model. 220:11481158.
Korner C., Stocklin J., Reuther-Thiebaud L., and Pelaez-Riedl S. 2008. Small differences in arrival time influence composition and productivity of plant communities. New Phytol. 177:698705.
Kremer R. G., Hunt E. R., Running S. W., and Coughlan J. C. 1996. Simulating vegetational and hydrologic responses to natural climatic variation and GCM-predicted climate change in a semi-arid ecosystem in Washington, USA. J. Arid Environ. 33:2238.
Kulmatiski A., Beard K. H., and Stark J. M. 2006. Exotic plant communities shift water-use timing in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Plant Soil 288:271284.
Lanta V. and Leps J. 2009. How does surrounding vegetation affect the course of succession: A five-year container experiment. J. Veg. Sci. 20:686694.
Li Y. H., Wang W., Liu Z. L., and Jiang S. 2008. Grazing Gradient versus Restoration Succession of Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. Grassland in Inner Mongolia. Restor. Ecol. 16:572583.
Li Z. Q., Bogaert J., and Nijs I. 2005. Gap pattern and colonization opportunities in plant communities: effects of species richness, mortality, and spatial aggregation. Ecography 28:777790.
Luzuriaga A. L. and Escudero A. 2008. What determines emergence and net recruitment in an early succession plant community? Disentangling biotic and abiotic effects. J. Veg. Sci. 19:445446.
Mahaming A. R., Mills A.A.S., and Adl S. M. 2009. Soil community changes during secondary succession to naturalized grasslands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 41:137147.
Mata-Gonzalez R., Hunter R. G., Coldren C. L., Mclendon T., and Paschke M. W. 2008. A comparison of modeled and measured impacts of resource manipulations for control of Bromus tectorum in sagebrush steppe. J. Arid Environ. 72:836846.
Mcintyre S., Lavorel S., and Tremont R. M. 1995. Plant Life-History Attributes - Their Relationship to Disturbance Responses in Herbaceous Vegetation. J. Ecol. 83:3144.
Mckinley D. C. and Van Auken O. W. 2005. Influence of interacting factors on the growth and mortality of Juniperus seedlings. Am. Midl. Nat. 154:320330.
Midoko-Iponga D., Krug C. B., and Milton S. J. 2005. Competition and herbivory influence growth and survival of shrubs on old fields: Implications for restoration of renosterveld shrubland. J. Veg. Sci. 16:685692.
Miller R. F. and Heyerdahl E. K. 2008. Fine-scale variation of historical fire regimes in semi-arid shrubland and woodland: an example from California, USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 17:245254.
[NRC] National Research Council. 1994. Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. Washington, DC National Academies Press. 200 p.
Papaik M. J. and Canham C. D. 2006. Species resistance and community response to wind disturbance regimes in northern temperate forests. J. Ecol. 94:10111026.
Pellant M., Shaver P., Pyke D. A., and Herrick J. E. 2005. Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health. Interagency Technical Reference 1734-6. Denver, Colorado USDI–Bureau of Land Management, National Business Center. 136 p.
Peltzer D. A., Bellingham P. J., Kurokawa H., Walker L. R., Wardle D. A., and Yeates G. W. 2009. Punching above their weight: low-biomass non-native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession. Oikos 118:10011014.
Pickett S.T.A., Collins S. L., and Armesto J. J. 1987. Model, mechanisms, and pathways of succession. Bot. Rev. 53:335371.
Pranagal J., Podstawka-Chmielewska E., and Slowinska-Jurkiewicz A. 2007. Influence on selected physical properties of a Haplic Podzol during a ten-year fallow period. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 16:875880.
Pyke D. A., Pellant M., Shaver P., and Herrick J. E. 2002. Rangeland health attributes and indicators for qualitative assessment. J. Range Manag. 55:584597.
Reed M. S., Dougill A. J., and Baker T. R. 2008. Participatory indicator development: What can ecologists and local communities learn from each other? Ecol. Appl. 18:12531269.
Sampson A. W. 1919. Plant Succession in Relation to Range Management. Washington, DC USDA. 76 p.
Sheley R. L., James J. J., and Bard E. C. 2009. Augmentative restoration: repairing damaged ecological processes during restoration of heterogeneous environments. Invasive Plant Sci. Manage. 2:1021.
Sheley R. L., Mangold J. M., and Anderson J. L. 2006. Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive plant-dominated rangelands. Ecol. Monogr. 76:365379.
Sheley R. L., Olson B. E., and Larson L. L. 1997. Effect of weed seed rate and grass defoliation level on diffuse knapweed. J. Range Manag. 50:3943.
Sheley R. S., Svejcar T. J., and Maxwell B. D. 1996. A theoretical framework for developing successional weed management strategies on rangeland. Weed Technol. 10:766773.
Sheley R., Vasquez E., James J., and Smith B. 2010. Applying Ecologically-based Invasive Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 63:605613.
Suman B. L. 2008. Ecological succession in relation to vegetative dynamics in grass flora and forage productivity on salt-affected soils of indo-gangetic plains. Range Manag. Agrofor. 29:4347.
Swanson F. J. and Franklin J. F. 1992. New forestry principles for ecosystem analysis of Pacific Northwest forests. Ecol. Appl. 2:262274.
Symstad A. J. 2000. A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology 81:99109.
Turnbull L. A., Crawley M. J., and Rees M. 2000. Are plant populations seed-limited? A review of seed sowing experiments. Oikos 88:225238.
Vasquez E., Sheley R., and Svejcar T. 2008. Creating invasion resistant soils via nitrogen management. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 1:304314.
Velazquez E. and Gomez-Sal A. 2008. Landslide early succession in a neotropical dry forest. Plant Ecol. 199:295308.
Velazquez E. and Gomez-Sal A. 2009. Changes in the Herbaceous Communities on the Landslide of the Casita Volcano, Nicaragua, during Early Succession. Folia Geobot. 44:118.
Vosse S., Esler K. J., Richardson D. M., and Holmes P. M. 2008. Can riparian seed banks initiate restoration after alien plant invasion? Evidence from the Western Cape, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 74:432444.
Walker L. R. and Del Moral R. 2009. Lessons from primary succession for restoration of severely damaged habitats. Appl. Veg. Sci. 12:5567.
Walker L. R., Walker J., and Hobbs R. J. 2007. Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession. New York Springer. 190 p.
Warren S. D., Blackburn W. H., and Taylor C. A. 1986. Soil Hydrologic Response to Number of Pastures and Stocking Density under Intensive Rotation Grazing. J. Range Manage. 39:500504.
Wei X. H., Li S., Yang P., and Cheng H. S. 2007. Soil erosion and vegetation succession in alpine Kobresia steppe meadow caused by plateau pika - A case study of Nagqu County, Tibet. Chinese Geogr. Sci. 17:7581.
Wilby A. and Brown V. K. 2001. Herbivory, litter and soil disturbance as determinants of vegetation dynamics during early old-field succession under set-aside. Oecologia 127:259265.
Wright B. R. and Clarke P. J. 2009. Fire, aridity and seed banks. What does seed bank composition reveal about community processes in fire-prone desert? J. Veg. Sci. 20:663674.
Yurkonis K. A. and Meiners S. J. 2006. Drought impacts and recovery are driven by local variation in species turnover. Plant Ecol. 184:325336.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Invasive Plant Science and Management
  • ISSN: 1939-7291
  • EISSN: 1939-747X
  • URL: /core/journals/invasive-plant-science-and-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.