Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-24T10:23:15.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rula Jurdi Abisaab's Reply to Devin Stewart's review of her book, Converting Persia: Religion and Power in the Safavid Empire, published in Iranian Studies, 39, 2, June 2006

Review products

Rula Jurdi Abisaab's Reply to Devin Stewart's review of her book, Converting Persia: Religion and Power in the Safavid Empire, published in Iranian Studies, 39, 2, June 2006

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Rula Jurdi Abisaab
Rula Jurdi Abisaab*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review: Reply and Rejoinder
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 423 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Rula Jurdi Abisaab 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In the modern period, Murtaā al-Anārī, a formidable uūlī jurist rejected ujiyyat al-ijmā‘ (consensus as an authoritative proof in legal inference) and refused to place it on a par with the Qur'an, the hadith and ‘aql as a source of juridical certainty. Al- Anārī, some even said, had destroyed the basis of consensus (“aama al-ijmā‘”).