Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T07:56:48.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The king's head

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Zainab Bahrani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The composition of the battle of Til-Tuba from Sennacherib's palace at Nineveh is usually described as a relief depicting a recorded historical event. It is considered a good and solid example of the Assyrian concern with history and the Assyrian propensity for propagandistic depictions of current events. The scene, which is surely saturated in the ideology of empire, has already been discussed from that point of view. Is it true to the historical event? Is it an exaggeration? Did the Assyrians really do these things? How close or how distant is this depiction of the battle from the real historical event of war?

The Assyrian method of representation is generally one that is attentive to minute details and concerned with ethnographic accuracy, even when the composition is hierarchical and representations of the body are stylised into abstract patterns. Realism is certainly a distinctive aspect of Assyrian narrative art and accurate details of dress and landscape were used to create what Roland Barthes would have called the effect of the real.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 66: Nineveh. Papers of the XLIXe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Part One , 2004 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Department of Art History and Archaeology, Columbia University, New York. For illustrations of the scenes discussed, see Barnett et al. 1998, 94–100, Pls. 286–320; the illustrations in the articles by Bonatz, Feldman and Watanabe in the present volume.

References

Bahrani, Zainab, 1995. “Assault and Abduction: The Fate of the Royal Image in the Ancient Near East” Art History 18 (3): 363–82.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Zainab, 2001. Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Mesopotamia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Zainab, 2003. The Graven Image: Representation in Babylonia and Assyria, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Richard D., Bleibtreu, Erika and Turner, Geoffrey, 1998. Sculptures from the Southwest Palace of Sennacherib at Nineveh, London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland, 1986. The Rustle of Language, New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Borger, Rykle, 1996. Beiträge zum Inschriftenwerk Assurbanipals, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Curtis, John E. and Reade, Julian E., 1995. Art and Empire: Treasures from Assyria in the British Museum, New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Harry N. Abrams.Google Scholar
Layard, A. H., 1853, A Second Series of the Monuments of Nineveh, London.Google Scholar
Luckenbill, Daniel David, 1927. Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia, II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Piepkorn, Arthur Carl, 1933. Historical Prism Inscriptions of Ashurbanipal, I, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reade, Julian E., 1976. “Elam and Elamites in Assyrian Sculpture”, Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 9, 97–106.Google Scholar
Reade, Julian E., 1979. “Narrative Composition in Assyrian Sculpture”, Baghdader Mitteilungen 10, 52–110.Google Scholar
Starr, Ivan, 1990. Queries to the Sungod: Divination and Politics in Sargonid Assyria, State Archives of Assyria IV, Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.Google Scholar