Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T23:37:57.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Early Dynastic-Akkadian transition, Part 2. The authors' response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

McGuire Gibson  and
Augusta McMahon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dr Matthews was kind enough to show us a draft of the preceding article before publication so that we could reply, for which we thank him. Our original article was intended as a review of the problem of the Early Dynastic to Akkadian transition and as a quick general overview of the WF excavation at Nippur, rather than the final statement on either. The point of the article was not to define the Akkadian Period but to make steps towards the identification of an assemblage of material culture (pottery, tablets, objects, and seals) found in levels which are dated to the historical Akkadian Period. That assemblage included pottery types, but we did not suggest that a single pottery type or a few types alone should be the basis for dating; nor would we prefer, as is implied by Matthews, to define a period by pottery as opposed to other objects. What the Nippur WF excavation gave us was a well-stratified sequence of artifacts; and we were careful when suggesting the level at which we might have entered the Akkadian (historical) period not to be adamant about the date of the pertinent level and to precede it with a “transitional” level (Level XVII) which might have been either Early Dynastic or Akkadian. Perhaps we should have been more cautious and extended that transitional label to cover Level XVI as well.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 59 , 1997 , pp. 9 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. M. 1965. Land Behind Baghdad. Chicago.Google Scholar
Al-Gailani Werr, L. 1992. Old Babylonian Cylinder Seals from the Hamrin (Edubba 2). London, Nabu Publications.Google Scholar
Amiet, P. 1976. L'art d'Agadé au Musée du Louvre. Paris, Éditions des Musées Nationaux.Google Scholar
Bates, M. L. 1986. History, geography and numismatics in the first century of Islamic coinage, Revue Suisse Numismatique 65, 231–62.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. 1965. Die Entwicklung der Glyptik während der Akkad-Zeit. Berlin.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R. M. 1967. Datierte Glyptik der Akkade-Zeit, in Bittel, K., Heinrich, E., Hrouda, B. and Nagel, W. (eds.), Vorderasiatische Archäologie, Studien und Aufsätze (Festschrift Anton Moortgat). Berlin, 42–56.Google Scholar
Bregstein, L. B. 1993. Seal Use in Fifth Century B.C. Nippur, Iraq: A Study of Seal Selection and Sealing Practices in the Murashu Archive. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B. 1981. Early Near Eastern Seals in the Yale Babylonian Collection. New Haven.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1982. Catalogue of the Western Asiatic Seals in the British Museum. Cylinder Seals II, Akkadian–Post-Akkadian–Ur III Periods. London, British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Collon, D. 1987. First Impressions. London, British Museum Publications.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P. 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region (OIP 63). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dittmann, R. 1994. Glyptikgruppen am Übergang von der Akkad- zur Ur Ill-Zeit, BaM 25, 75–117.Google Scholar
Frankfort, H. 1955. Stratified Cylinder Seals from the Diyala Region (OIP 72). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1972. The City and Area of Kish. Miami, Field Research Reports.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. (ed.) 1981. Uch Tepe I. Copenhagen, Akademisk Forlag, and Chicago, Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG. 1982. A re-evaluation of the Akkad Period in the Diyala region on the basis of recent excavations at Nippur and in the Hamrin, American Journal of Archaeology 86, 531–38.Google Scholar
Gibson, McG., and McMahon, A. 1995. Investigation of the Early Dynastic-Akkadian transition: report of the 18th and 19th seasons of excavation in Area WF, Nippur, Iraq 57, 1–39.Google Scholar
Green, A. (ed.) 1993. The 6G Ash-Tip and its Contents: Cultic and Administrative Discard from the Temple? (Abu Salabikh Excavations 4). 2 vols., London, British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Hansen, D. P. 1965. The relative chronology of Mesopotamia. Part II. The pottery sequence at Nippur from the Middle Uruk to the Old Babylonian Period (3400–1600 B.C.), in Ehrich, R. W. (ed.), Chronologies in Old World Archaeology (2nd edn.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 201–13.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. 1985. Rapport préliminaire sur la céramique du Bronze Ancien IVa découverte au “Palais Présargonique 1” de Mari, MARI 4, 127–36.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M., et al. 1987. Rapport préliminaire sur la troisième campagne de fouilles à Tell Melebiya (Moyen Khabour — automne 1986), Akkadica 51, 1–74.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. (ed.) 1993. Akkad — the First World Empire (History of the Ancient Near East — Studies V). Padova.Google Scholar
Martin, H. P., and Matthews, R. J. 1993. Seals and sealings, in Green 1993, 23–81.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M. 1991. Tell Brak 1990: the glyptic, Iraq 53, 147–57.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M. 1997. The Early Bronze Age Glyptic of Tell Brak: Cylinder Seals of Third Millennium Syria (OBO s.a. 15). Freiburg Schweiz und Göttingen.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. 1993. The Early Dynastic to Akkadian Period Transition in Southern Mesopotamia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Moon, J. 1987. Catalogue of Early Dynastic Pottery (Abu Salabikh Excavations 3). London, British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Moon, J. 1993. Pottery, in Green 1993, 145–57.Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S. 1978. Kish Excavations 1923–1933. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, W., and Strommenger, E. 1968. Reichsakkadische Glyptik und Plastik im Rahmen der mesopotamisch-elamischen Geschichte, Berliner Jahrbuch für Vor- und Frühgeschichte 8, 137–206.Google Scholar
Oates, D., and Oates, J. 1993. Excavations at Tell Brak, 1992–93, Iraq 55, 155–99.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 1985. Chronology of the Royal Cemetery of Ur, Iraq 47, 129–58.Google Scholar
Porada, E., et al. 1992. Mesopotamia, in Ehrich, R. W. (ed.), Chronologies in Old World Archaeology (3rd edn.). 2 vols., Chicago, 77–121.Google Scholar
Van Loon, M. N. 1979. 1974 and 1975 preliminary results of the excavations at Selenkahiye near Meskene, Syria, AASOR 44 (for 1977), 97–112.Google Scholar
Walker, C. B. F. 1995. Mesopotamian chronology, in Collon, D., Ancient Near Eastern Art. London, British Museum Press, 230–8.Google Scholar
Watelin, L. Ch., and Langdon, St. 1934. Excavations at Kish IV, 1925–1930. Paris, Geuthner.Google Scholar
Wilcke, C. 1987. Inschriften 1983–1984, in Hrouda, B. (ed.), Isin-Išan Bahriyat III (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, Abh. NF 94). München, 83–120.Google Scholar
Zettler, R. 1979. On the chronological range of Neo-Babylonian and Achaemenid seals, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 38, 257–70.Google Scholar