Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:22:18.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expelling demons at Nineveh: The visibility of benevolent demons in the palaces of Nineveh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Tallay Ornan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As has been shown and extensively dealt with in early and more recent scholarship, Neo-Assyrian palatial wall reliefs went through many thematic changes throughout their two hundred and fifty years of existence. One of their conspicuous traits was a gradual abandoning of magical-religious subject matters, represented by protective supernatural beings, in favour of larger and more detailed historical compositions — mostly of a belligerent nature — revealing, for the first time in antiquity, a truer sense of narrative display. As the narrative-historical themes were rightly considered to be an innovative and prominent contribution of Assyrian imagery to the history of art, extensive efforts have been devoted to the study of these compositions within the context of Assyrian palaces.

In the present contribution I intend, however, to concentrate on the “losing” side of Assyrian palatial decoration, namely to focus on the visibility of apotropaic fantastic creatures rendered on wall reliefs and to offer some explanation for their gradual expulsion from the pictorial display of the Assyrian palace. Following Porada, in this essay these hybrids are called demons, in accordance with the Greek term daimon. Benevolent demons appear already in early ninth-century Neo-Assyrian wall reliefs, both in temples, as shown by a small number of slabs from the Ninurta Temple at Nimrud, and much more commonly in palaces, in particular within the North-West Palace.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 66: Nineveh. Papers of the XLIXe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Part One , 2004 , pp. 83 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Israel Museum, Jerusalem.

References

Barnett, R. D. and Falkner, M., 1962, The Sculptures of Aššur-nasir-apli II (883–859 BC), Tiglath-Pileser III (745–727 BC), Esarhaddon (681–669 BC) from the Central and South-West Palaces at Nimrud, London.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D., 1976, Sculptures from the North Palace of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh, 668–627 B.C., London.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. D., Turner, G. and Bleibtreu, E., 1998, Sculptures from the Southwest Palace of Sennacherib at Nineveh, British Museum, London.Google Scholar
Curtis, J., 1988, Assyria as a Bronzeworking Centre in the Late Assyrian Period, in Curtis, J. (ed.), Bronze-Working Centres of Western Asia c. 1000–539 BC, London, 83–96.Google Scholar
Engel, B. J., 1987, Darstellungen von Dämonen und Tieren in assyrischen Palästen und Tempeln nach den schriftlichen Quellen, Mönchengladbach.Google Scholar
Green, A., 1985, A Note on the “Scorpion-Man” and Pazuzu, Iraq 47, 75–82.Google Scholar
Groenewegen-Frankfort, H. A., 1987, Arrest and Movement, An Essay on Space and Time in the Representational Art of the Ancient Near East (Paperback Edition: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Kölbe, D., 1981, Die Reliefprogramme religiös-mythologischen Charakters in neu-assyrischen Palästen, Frankfort.Google Scholar
Layard, A. H., 1849, Monuments of Nineveh I, London.Google Scholar
Layard, A. H., 1853, Monuments of Nineveh II, London.Google Scholar
Livingstone, A., 1989, Court Poetry and Literary Miscellanea (SAA 3). Helsinki.Google Scholar
Magen, U., 1986, Assyrische Königsdarstellungen — Aspekte der Herrschaft, eine Typologie, Mainz.Google Scholar
Moortgat-Correns, U., 1988, Ein Kultbild Ninurtas aus neuassyrischer Zeit, AfO 35, 117–33.Google Scholar
Oman, T., 2001, Ištar as Depicted on Finds from Israel, in Mazar, A. (ed.), Studies in the Archaeology of the Iron Age in Israel and Jordan (JSOT Suppl. 331), Sheffield, 235–56.Google Scholar
Ornan, T., 2004, Idols and Symbols — Divine Representations in First Millennium Mesopotamian Art and the Second Commandment, Tel Aviv, 31, 90–121.Google Scholar
Ornan, T., 2005 (forthcoming), The Triumph of the Symbol, Mesopotamian Visual Background of the Biblical Image Ban (OBO), Fribourg and Göttingen.Google Scholar
Reade, J., 1977, Shikaft-i Gulgul: Its Date and Symbolism, IrAn 12, 33–44.Google Scholar
Reade, J., 1979, Assyrian Architectural Decoration: Techniques and Subject Matter, BaM 10, 17–49.Google Scholar
Rittig, D., 1977, Assyrisch-babylonianische Kleinplastik magischer Bedeutung vom 13.-6. Jh. v. Chr., Munich.Google Scholar
Russell, J. M., 1991, Sennacherib's Palace Without Rival, Chicago.Google Scholar
Russell, J. M., 1998, The Program of the Palace of Assurnasirpal II at Nimrud: Issues in the Research and Presentation of Assyrian Art, AJA 102, 655–715.Google Scholar
Ussishkin, D., 1982, The Conquest of Lachish by Sennacherib, Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F. A. M., 1992, Mesopotamian Protective Spirits: The Ritual Texts (Cuneiform Monographs I), Groningen Google Scholar
Winter, I. J., 1981, Royal Rhetoric and the Development of Historical Narrative in Neo-Assyrian Reliefs, Studies in Visual Communication 7, 2–38.Google Scholar
Winter, I. J., 1992, “Idols of the king”: Royal Images as Recipients of Ritual Action in Ancient Mesopotamia, Journal of Ritual Studies (Special Issue, Art in Ritual Context) 6(1), 12–42.Google Scholar