Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Advocacy strategies for human rights: the campaign for the moratorium on the death penalty

  • Raffaele Marchetti (a1)
Abstract

This article examines the different strategies used by transnational actors in advocacy against the death penalty. In particular, it studies the strategies adopted by the transnational campaign for the moratorium on capital punishment in view of the United Nations General Assembly vote of 2007 and subsequent years (2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014). The article shows that a variety of different strategies are used in the organizational, institutional, and communicative domains. Within the broader debate on norm diffusion, this article sheds light on the under-investigated area of specific tactics, which include horizontal networking, multilayered political lobbying, reason-based framing, and emotion-based story-telling, deployed by transnational activists to induce key actors to change their policy preference.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: rmarchetti@luiss.it
References
Hide All
Amnesty International (2005), La pena di morte nel mondo, Torina: EGA Editore.
Amnesty International (2007), ‘La risoluzione per una moratoria sulle esecuzioni all’Assemblea Generale delle Nazioni Unite – Una valutazione’. Sezione Italiana, Rome.
Bandy, J. and Smith, J. (eds) (2004), Coalitions Across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bantekas, I. and Hodgkinson, P. (2000), ‘Capital punishment at the United Nations: recent developments’, Criminal Law Forum 11(1): 2334.
Baumgartner, F.R., De Boef, S.L. and Boydstun, A.E. (2008), The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bob, C. (2012), The Right Wing and the Clash of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burgerman, S. (1998), ‘Mobilizing principles: the role of transnational activists in promoting human rights principles’, Human Rights Quarterly 20(4): 905923.
Busby, J.W. (2007), ‘Bono made Jesse Helms cry: Jubilee 200, debt relief, and moral action in international politics’, International Studies Quarterly 51(2): 247275.
Busby, J.W. (2010), Moral Movements and Foreign Policy , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carpenter, R.C. (2010), ‘Governing the global agenda: gate-keeping and issue adoption in transnational advocacy networks’, in D.D. Avant, M. Finnemore and S. Sell (eds), Who Governs the Globe?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202237.
Council of the European Union (2013), ‘EU guidelines on death penalty. 8416/13 (COHOM 64, PESC 403, OC 213)’. Council of the European Union, Brussels.
Crawford, N.C. (2000), ‘The passion of world politics: propositions on emotion and emotional relationships’, International Security 24(4): 116156.
della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999), Social Movements: An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (eds) (2005), Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) (2013), ‘Delivering on the death penalty’. Europeaid, Brussels.
European External Action Service (2013), ‘Background: the death penalty and the EU’s policy on its abolition’. Department for Human Rights and Democracy, Brussels.
Ferrari, L. (2003), ‘Transnational advocacy against capital punishment: a role for the holy see’, International Journal of Human Rights 7(2): 2841.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2011), ‘HMG strategy for abolition of the death penalty 2010-2015’. Human Rights and Democracy Department, London.
Goffman, E. (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of the Experience, New York: Harper Colophon.
Goodwin, J., Jasper, J.M. and Polletta, F. (eds) (2001), Passionate Politics. Emotions and Social Movements, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Hodgkinson, P. and Schabas, W.A. (eds) (2004), Capital Punishment: Strategies for Abolition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jervis, R. (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kirchmeier, J.L. (2002), ‘Another place beyond here: the death penalty moratorium movement in the United States’, University of Colorado Law Review 73(1): 1116.
Kissack, R.E. (2008), Outreach, Overstretch or Underhand? Strategies for Crossregional Consensus in Support of a UN General Assembly Resolution on a Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, London: LSE-European Foreign Policy Unit, Working Paper No. 2008/2.
Kohler-Koch, B. and Quittkat, C. (2013), De-Mystification of Participatory Democracy: EU-Governance and Civil Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lebow, R.N. (2008), A Cultural Theory of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marazzitti, M. (2010), ‘Diplomazia umanitaria contro la pena di morte’, in R.M. della Rocca (ed.), Fare pace. La Comunità di Sant’Egidio negli scenari internazionali, Roma: Leonardo International, pp. 293324.
Marazzitti, M. (2015), Life. Da Caino al Califfato: verso un mondo senza pena di morte, Milan: Mondadori.
Marchetti, R. (2009), ‘Mapping alternative models of global politics’, International Studies Review 11(1): 133156.
Marchetti, R. (2013), ‘Civil society-government synergy and normative power Italy’, The International Spectator 48(4): 102118.
Marchetti, R. (2016a), Global Strategic Engagement. The Rules of Global Governance, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Marchetti, R. (ed.) (2016b), Partnership in International Policy Making: Civil Society and Public Institutions in Global and European Affairs, London: Palgrave.
Mathias, M.D. (2013), ‘The sacralization of the individual: human rights and the abolition of the death penalty’, American Journal of Sociology 118(5): 12461283.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D. and Zald, M.N. (1996), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, J.D. and Zald, M.N. (1977), ‘Resources mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 12121241.
McGann, A. and Sandholtz, W. (2012), ‘Patterns of death penalty abolition, 1960-2005: domestic and international factors’, International Studies Quarterly 56(2): 275289.
Ministère des Affaires étrangères (2012), Campagne mondiale pour l’abolition universelle de la peine de mort-Dossier de presse, Paris: Republique Francaise.
Missoni, E. and Alesani, D. (2013), Management of International Institutions and NGOs: Frameworks, Practices and Challenges, London: Routledge.
Murphy, C.N. and Yates, J.A. (2011), ‘ISO 26000, alternative standards, and the “social movement of engineers” involved with standard-setting’, in S. Ponte, P. Gibbon, J. and Vestergaard (eds), Governing Through Standards: Origins, Drivers, and Limitations, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 159183.
Nessuno tocchi Caino (2007), ‘La campagna del Partito Radicale e di Nessuno tocchi Caino per la moratoria ONU’, in Nessuno tocchi Caino (ed.), La pena di morte nel mondo. Rapporto 2007, Roma: Nessuno tocchi Caino, pp. 218–275.
Neumayer, E. (2008), ‘Death penalty: the political foundations of the global trend towards abolition’, Human Rights Review 9(2): 241268.
Orenstein, M.A. (2008), Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Price, R. (1998), ‘Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets land mines’, International Organization 52(3): 613644.
Robert, P. and Alberman, D. (2007), ‘European initiative for democracy and human rights. Evaluation on the abolition of death penalty projects – final report’. Europeaid No. 116548/C/SV, Brussels.
Sculier, C. (2010), Towards a Universal Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. Strategies, Arguments and Perspectives, Chatillon: World Coalition Against Death Penalty (WCADP).
Sell, S. and Prakash, A. (2004), ‘Using ideas strategically: the contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights’, International Studies Quarterly 48: 143175.
Senato della Repubblica (2002), ‘Indagine conoscitiva sui livelli e i meccanismi di tutela dei diritti umani, vigenti nella realtà internazionale’. Commissione straordinaria per la tutela e la promozione dei diritti umani (XIV Legislatura, seduta di mercoledì 25 settembre), Rome.
Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D. (1988), ‘Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization’, in B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi and S. Tarrow (eds), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 137196.
Snow, D.A., Rochford, E.B., Worden, S.K. and Benford, R.D. (1986), ‘Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation’, American Sociological Review 51(4): 464481.
Tarrow, S. (2005), The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (1971), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on capital punishment’, A/RES/2857/XXVI. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (1977), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on capital punishment’, A/RES/32/60. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2007), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on the moratorium on the use of the death penalty’, A/RES/62/149. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2008a), ‘Moratoriums on the use of the death penalty: report of the Secretary-General’, A/63/293. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2008b), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on the moratorium on the use of the death penalty’, A/RES/63/168. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2010), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on the moratorium on the use of the death penalty’, A/RES/65/206. United Nations, New York.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2011), ‘Note verbale from the permanent mission of Egypt to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General’, A/65/779. United Nations, New York, NY.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2012), ‘Moratoriums on the use of the death penalty: report of the Secretary-General’, A/67/226. United Nations, New York, NY.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) (2014), ‘Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on the moratorium on the use of the death penalty’, A/RES/69/186. United Nations, New York.
Volkan, V.D., Montville, J.V. and Julius, D.A. (1991), The Psychodynamics of International Relationships, Vol. 2, Unofficial Diplomacy at Work, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Wendt, A. (1995), ‘Constructing international politics’, International Security 20(1): 7181.
Widmaier, W.W. and Park, S. (2012), ‘Differences beyond theory: structural, strategic, and sentimental approaches to normative change’, International Studies Perspectives 13(2): 123134.
Yanacopulos, H. (2005), ‘The strategies that bind: NGO coalitions and their influence’, Global Networks 5(1): 93110.
Zamparutti, E. (ed.) (2007), ‘La pena di morte nel mondo’ Rapporto 2007 Nessuno tocchi Caino, Hands off Cain, Rome: Reality Book.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • ISSN: 0048-8402
  • EISSN: 2057-4908
  • URL: /core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed