Skip to main content

Successful student activism in contemporary Italian universities

  • Lorenzo Cini (a1)

This article assesses the strategies that the Italian student activists adopted in order to influence the revision process of the governance structure of their universities in 2011. Which kind of strategy has enabled these activists to influence more successfully this process? I argue that the joint pressure of insiders and outsiders allows student activists to get their voice more effectively heard from the university leaders than when one of the two forms of pressure is absent. The ‘power of the streets’ exerted by the ‘outsiders’, combined with the institutional power of the ‘insiders’, produces a significant amplifying effect in the governing bodies. University leaders fear this kind of alliance, as they perceive that insiders with a strong tie with other actors are the expression of a collective voice that is difficult to neutralize. On the other hand, the outsiders are also aware that their collective strength is more likely to be translated into institutional power and action from their allies and/or representatives. To empirically probe this proposition, I have singled out three Italian universities (University of Turin, Sapienza of Rome, and Federico II of Naples), which witnessed high levels of student mobilization in the past years (2008–13), and where student activists and their organizations adopted the most different array of strategies. More specifically, while at the University of Turin the student activists were able to deploy simultaneously both forms of pressure, at the Federico II of Naples and Sapienza of Rome one of the two forms was lacking.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Amenta E., Carruthers B. and Zylan Y. (1992), ‘A hero for the aged? The Townsend movement, the political mediation model, and U.S. old-age policy, 1934–1950’, American Journal of Sociology 98: 308339.
Arthur M. (2011), Student Activism and Curricular Change in Higher Education, Farnham: Ashgate.
Balsiger P. (2014), ‘Managing protest: the political action repertoires of corporations’, in D. della Porta and D. Mario (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 653666.
Bennett A. and George A.L. (2001), ‘Case studies and process tracing in history and political science: similar strokes for different foci’, in C. Elman and M. F. Elman (eds), Bridges and Boundaries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 137166.
Bosi L., Giugni M. and Uba K. (2016), ‘The consequences of social movements. Taking stock and looking forward’, in L. Bosi, M. Giugni and K. Uba (eds), The Consequences of Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338.
Capano G. (2008), ‘Looking for serendipity – the problematical reform within Italy’s universities’, Higher Education 55: 481504.
Cini L. (2016a), ‘Student struggles and power relations in contemporary universities. The cases of Italy and England’, in R. Brooks (ed.), Student Politics and Protest: International Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 4971.
Cini L. (2016b), The contentious politics of higher education. Struggles and power relations within the English and Italian universities. Unpublished PhD dissertation. European University Institute, Florence.
Cini L. (2017), ‘From student to general struggle. The protests against the neoliberal reforms in higher education in contemporary Italy’, in A. Mark and H.-M. Ratiba (eds), Generations and Protests: Legacies, Emergences in the MENA Region and the Mediterranean, Leiden: Brill, pp. 5572.
Cini L. and Guzman-Concha C. (2017), ‘Student movements in the age of austerity. The cases of Chile and England’, Social Movement Studies 3(16): 16.
Cress D. and Snow D. (2000), ‘The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation, and Framing’, American Journal of Sociology 105: 10631104.
Crossley N. (2003), ‘From reproduction to transformation: social movement fields and the radical habitus’, Theory, Culture & Society 20(6): 4368.
Culpepper P. (2011), Quiet Politics and Business Power. Corporate Control in Europe and Japan, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Davis G., McAdam D., Scott R. and Zald M. (2005), Social Movements and Organization Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
della Porta D. and Rucht D. (1995), ‘Left-libertarian Movements in Context: Comparing Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990’, in J. C. Jenkins and B. Klandermans (eds), The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 229272.
della Porta D. (2008), ‘Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research’, in M. Keating and D. della Porta (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198222.
della Porta D. (2013), Clandestine Political Violence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
della Porta D. (2015), Social Movements in Times of Austerity. Bringing Capitalism Back in Protest Analysis, Oxford: Polity Press.
della Porta D. and Diani M. (2006), Social Movements. An Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Gamson W. (1990 [1975]), The Strategy of Social Protest, Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
Giugni M. (1998), ‘Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements’, Annual Review of Sociology 98: 371393.
Giugni M. (2004), Social Protest and Policy Change. Ecology, Antinuclear, and Peace Movements in Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Giugni M., McAdam D. and Tilly C. (1999), How Social Movements Matter, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Goodwin J. and Jasper J. (2012), Contention in Context. Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jasper J. (2006), Getting Your Way: Strategic Dilemmas in the Real World, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Jasper J. (2015), ‘Introduction. Playing the game’, in J. Jasper and W. Duyvendak (eds), Players and Arenas. The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 932.
Jasper J., Moran K. and Tramontano M. (2015), ‘Strategy’, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 399409.
King G. (2008), ‘A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism’, Administrative Science Quarterly 53: 395421.
King G. (2016), ‘Reputation, risk, and anti-corporate activism: how social movements influence corporate outcomes’, in L. Bosi, M. Giugni and K. Uba (eds), The Consequences of Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215236.
Kitschelt H. (1986), ‘Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 16: 5785.
Kolb F. (2007), Protest and Opportunities. The Political Outcomes of Social Movements, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Kriesi H. (2004), ‘Political context and opportunity’, in D. Snow, S. Soule and H. Kriesi (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 6790.
Lijphart A. (1975), ‘The comparable-case strategy in comparative research’, Comparative Political Studies 8: 158177.
McAdam D., Tarrow S. and Tilly C. (2001), Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mccammon H. and Moon M. (2015), ‘Social movement coalition’, in D. della Porta and M. Diani (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326339.
McCarthy J. and Zald M.N. (1977), ‘Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82(6): 12121241.
Meyerson D. and Tompkins M. (2007), ‘Tempered radicals as institutional change agents: the case of advancing gender equality at the University of Michigan’, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 303(30): 121.
Moore K. (1999), ‘Political protest and institutional change: the anti-Vietnam war movement and American science’, in M. Giugni, D. McAdam and C. Tilly (eds), How Social Movements Matter, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 97116.
Pettinicchio D. (2012), ‘Institutional activism: reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy’, Sociology Compass 6(6): 499510.
Pettinicchio D. (2017), ‘Elites, policy, and social movements’, in B. Wejnert and P. Parigi (eds), Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 24 Bingley: Emerald Publishing Group Limited, pp. 155190.
Piazza G. (2014), ‘Non solo studenti: le ondate di protesta nelle scuole e nelle università’, in L. Alteri and L. Raffini (eds), La nuova politica. Movimenti, mobilitazioni e conflitti in Italia, Napoli: EdiSES, pp. 5170.
Piven F. (2006), Challenging Authority. How Ordinary People Change America, New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Piven F. and Cloward R. (1979), Poor People’s Movements, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Regini M. (2014), La Riforma Universitaria nel Quadro dei Sistemi di Governance Europei, Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Santoro W. and McGuire G. (1997), ‘Social movement insiders: the impact of institutional activists on affirmative action and comparable worth policies’, Social Problems 44(4): 503519.
Scharpf F. (1997), Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Oxford: Westview Press.
Silver B. (2003), Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarrow S. (1998), Power in Movement. Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vennesson P. (2008), ‘Case studies and process tracing: theories and practices’, in M. Keating and D. della Porta (eds), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker E., Martin A. and McCarthy J. (2008), ‘Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: the influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires’, American Journal of Sociology 114(1): 397417.
Weber K., Rao H. and Thomas L.G. (2009), ‘From streets to suites: how the anti-biotech movement penetrated German pharmaceutical firms’, American Sociological Review 74: 106127.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • ISSN: 0048-8402
  • EISSN: 2057-4908
  • URL: /core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Cini supplementary material

 Word (13 KB)
13 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 340 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 5th June 2017 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.