No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Which Level of Government Do the ASEAN People Think that Environmental Issues Should Be Decided By? An Analysis of the ASEAN-Barometer Survey of 2009
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2014
Abstract
This paper explores preferences and attitudes related to fiscal federalism held by the ASEAN people in the context of environmental issues. Fiscal federalism would predict that local environmental problems will be handled more efficiently by local governments, while national environmental problems will be solved more efficiently by the national government. But it is not obvious whether citizens consider in the same way as economics theory predicts. To unveil this point, I address questions of whether those who have higher consciousness toward environmental issues at the neighbor or local level prefer local governments to decide environment policies, whether those who have more consciousness about environmental issues at the national level prefer the national government to decide the policies, and whether those who have higher consciousness toward environmental problems at global level prefer higher levels government such as the United Nations to decide the policies. By fitting multi-level probit regressions to cross-national survey data collected in ASEAN countries, I found the results supporting the hypotheses. The country analyses show the results which support the hypotheses in Brunei, Indonesia, and the Philippines.
- Type
- Special Issue Articles
- Information
- Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 15 , Issue 2: Quality of Life and Environmentalism in ASEAN , June 2014 , pp. 203 - 230
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
CIA, The World Factbook, www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook (accessed on 11 May 2011 and 5 January 2014).Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi (ed.) (2010), ‘ASEAN-Barometer 2009 Environment and Health Survey’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi and Fujii, Seiji (2013), The Quality of Life in Asia: A Comparison of Quality of Life in Asia, (with T. Inoguchi), Quality of Life in Asia Volume 1, Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtani, Shinsukeet al. (2005), Shakai Chosa Heno Approach–Riron to Houhou (Introduction to Social Survey–Theory and Practice), 2nd edn, Kyoto: Minerva Shobo.Google Scholar
DeBardeleben, Joan (2003), ‘Fiscal Federalism and How Russians Vote’, Europe–Asia Studies, 55 (3): 339–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Carol (2008), ‘Measuring Quality of Life in Latin America: Some Insights from Happiness Economics and the Latino Barometro’, in Møller, Valerie, Huschka, Denis, and Michalos, Alex C. (eds.), Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe: How Are We Doing?, Vol. 33, Social Indicators Research Book Series, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 71–106.Google Scholar
Hong, Do Manh (2006), ‘Vietnam: Economic Development and Improvement of Living Standard’, in Inoguchi, Takashi, Tanaka, Akihiko, Sonoda, Shigeto and Dadabaev, Timur (eds.), Human Beliefs and Values in Striding Asia: East Asia in Focus: Country Profiles, Thematic Analyses and Sourcebook based on the AsiaBarometer Survey of 2004, Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 (accessed on 11 May 2011).Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1970), ‘Public Opinion and Regional Integration’, International Organization, 24 (4): 764–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangahas, Mahar and Guerrero, Linda Luz B. (2008), ‘Two Decades of Social Weather Reporting in the Philippines’, in Møller, Valerie, Huschka, Denis, and Michalos, Alex C. (eds.), Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe: How Are We Doing?, Vol. 33, Social Indicators Research Book Series, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
Michalos, Alex C. (2008), ‘Introduction: An Overview of the Larger View’, in Møller, Valerie, Huschka, Denis, and Michalos, Alex C. (eds.), Barometers of Quality of Life Around the Globe: How Are We Doing?, Vol. 33, Social Indicators Research Book Series, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. xv–xxii.Google Scholar
Pratikno and I Ketut Putra Erawan (2006), ‘Indonesia: The Paradox of Change', in Inoguchi, Takashi, Tanaka, Akihiko, Sonoda, Shigeto, and Dadabaev, Timur (eds.), Human Beliefs and Values in Striding Asia: East Asia in Focus: Country Profiles, Thematic Analyses and Sourcebook Based on the AsiaBarometer Survey of 2004, Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, pp. 229–242.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1954), ‘Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (4): 387–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2000), Economics of the Public Sector, 3rd edn, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, Hj Hamzah and Hotta, Zen-U Lucian (2006), ‘Brunei: The Living Conditions, Preferences, and Concerns’, in Inoguchi, Takashi, Tanaka, Akihiko, Sonoda, Shigeto and Dadavaev, Timur (eds.), Human Beliefs and Values in Striding Asia: East Asia in Focus: Country Profiles, Thematic Analyses and Sourcebook based on the AsiaBarometer Survey of 2004, Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, pp. 261–76.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956), ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5): 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Un, Khean (2006), ‘Cambodia: Beliefs and Perceptions in a Postconflict Society’, in Inoguchi, Takashi, Tanaka, Akihiko, Sonoda, Shigeto and Dadavaev, Timur (eds.), Human Beliefs and Values in Striding Asia: East Asia in Focus: Country Profiles, Thematic Analyses and Sourcebook Based on the AsiaBarometer Survey of 2004, Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, pp. 155–71.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2010, http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table7_reprint.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2011).Google Scholar
World Bank, Data, CO2 Emissions, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC (accessed on 11 May 2011).Google Scholar