Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:17:31.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceptions of Handbills as a Promotional Medium: An Exploratory Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2005

GERARD PRENDERGAST
Affiliation:
School of Business, Hong Kong Baptist University, Gerard@hkbu.edu.hk
YUEN SZE MAN
Affiliation:
School of Business, Hong Kong Baptist University, irisyuen@cheerful.com
Get access

Abstract

A handbill (i.e., a leaflet distributed by hand) is a form of advertising especially common in high-traffic pedestrian districts. However, there are no previous reports in the literature relating to consumer perceptions of handbills as a promotional medium. This article reports on a telephone survey of a random sample of 240 interviewees in Hong Kong and represents a starting point for research on this topic. One hundred and seventy-four (72.5 percent) of the interviewees were classified as handbill acceptors, and 66 (27.5 percent) were classified as handbill nonacceptors. Among the handbill acceptors, 71.8 percent actually read the handbills. In addition, handbill acceptors were more likely to be female, younger, and to have had secondary or tertiary education. The main reason acceptors gave for taking handbills was to help the distributor finish his or her work promptly. The main reason nonacceptors gave for refusing handbills was that the handbills are distributed during peak hours, when they are too busy to stop. Handbill acceptors predictably had more favorable perceptions of handbill attributes than handbill nonacceptors. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for advertisers and future research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Copyright © 1960-2005, The ARF

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belch, George, and Michael Belch. Advertising and Promotions: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Bhargava, Mukesh, and Naveen Donthu. “Sales Response to Outdoor Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 39, 4 (1999): 717.Google Scholar
Donthu, Naveen, Joseph Cherian, and Mukesh Bhargava. “Factors Influencing Recall of Outdoor Advertising.” Journal of Advertising Research 33, 3 (1993): 6472.Google Scholar
Heckman, J.J.Varieties of Selection Bias.” American Economic Review 80, 2 (1990): 31318.Google Scholar
Prendergast, Gerard, and Chi Hang Chan. “The Effectiveness of Exterior Bus Advertising.” Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11, 3 (1999): 3350.Google Scholar
Richards, Jef, and Catharine Curran. “Oracles on Advertising: Searching for a Definition.” Journal of Advertising 31, 2 (2002): 6377.Google Scholar