Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-qdphv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-25T10:40:53.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designing a Dedicated Energy Crop Supply System in Tennessee: A Multiobjective Optimization Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. Edward Yu ,
Zidong Wang ,
Burton C. English  and
James A. Larson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multiobjective optimization model integrating with high-resolution geographical data was applied to examine the optimal switchgrass supply system in Tennessee that considers both feedstock cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the system. Results suggest that the type of land converted into switchgrass production is crucial to both plant gate cost and GHG emissions of feedstock. In addition, a tradeoff relationship between cost and GHG emissions for the switchgrass supply is primarily driven by the type of land converted. The imputed cost of lowering GHG emissions in the feedstock supply system was also calculated based on the derived tradeoff curve.

Biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) is being advocated as an alternative to fossil-based transportation fuels in the United States. LCB-based biofuel production has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the transportation sector and to enhance rural economic activity through more intense use of agricultural lands (English et al., 2006). The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) established in 2005 and revised in the Energy Independence and Security Act 2007 mandates 21 billion gallons of advanced biofuel (other than ethanol derived from corn starch) available for transportation use by 2022 with 16 billion gallons to be produced from LCB feedstock (U.S. Congress, 2007). Based on the recently revised One Billion Ton Update study (U. S. Department of Energy, 2011), considerable LCB feedstock, including dedicated energy crops, will be required to fulfill this goal. Notwithstanding the potential availability of LCB feedstock to meet the mandate, the cost of LCB feedstock will be an important factor influencing the sustainability of an LCB-based biofuel industrial sector.

Keywords

:bioenergyland use changemultiobjectiveswitchgrasstradeoff curve:C61Q13Q16

Information

Type
Emerging Scholar Papers
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 357 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agren, G.I., and Franklin, O.. “Root:Shoot Ratios, Optimization and Nitrogen Productivity.” Annals of Botany 92(2003): 795–800.Google Scholar
American Agricultural Economics Association. Commodity Cost and Returns Handbook. Ames, IA: American Agricultural Economics Association, 2000.Google Scholar
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. Agricultural Machinery Standards. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Standard EP496.3,2006.Google Scholar
An, H., Wilhelm, W.E., and Searcy, S.W., “Biofuel and Petroleum-Based Fuel Supply Chain Research: A Literature Review.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35(2011): 3763-74.Google Scholar
Archer, D.W., and Johnson, J.M.. “Evaluating Local Crop Residue Biomass Supply: Economic and Environmental Impacts.” BioEnergy Research 5,3(2012):699–712.Google Scholar
Argonne National Laboratory. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation Model (GREET). Internet site: http://greet.es.anl.gov (Accessed March 5, 2013).Google Scholar
Bernardi, A., Giarola, S., and Bezzo, F.. “Spatially Explicit Multi-Objective Optimisation for the Strategic Design of First and Second Generation Biorefineries Including Carbon and Water Footprints.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 35,9(2012): 1782-97.Google Scholar
Bowling, I.M., Ponce-Ortega, J.M.a., and El-Halwagi, M.M.. “Facility Location and Supply Chain Optimization for a Biorefinery.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50,10(2011): 6276-86.Google Scholar
Chankong, V., and Haimes, Y.Y.. Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1983.Google Scholar
De La Torre Ugarte, D., Ray, D., and Tiller, K.. “Using the POLYSYS Modeling Framework to Evaluate Environmental Impacts on Agriculture.” Evaluating Natural Resource Use in Agriculture. Robertson, T. English, B.C. and Alexander, R.R., eds. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dunnett, A., Adjiman, C., and Shah, N.. “Biomass to Heat Supply Chains: Applications of Process Optimization.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 85,5(2007):419-29.Google Scholar
Elliott, J., Sharma, B., Best, N., Glotter, M., Dunn, J.B., Foster, I., Miguez, F., Mueller, S., and Wang, M.. “A Spatial Modeling Framework to Evaluate Domestic Biofuel-Induced Potential Land Use Changes and Emissions.” Environmental Science & Technology 48,4(2014): 2488-96.Google Scholar
English, B.C., D.G. De La Torre Ugarte, , Walsh, M.E., Hellwinckel, C.M., and Menard, R.J.. “Economic Competitiveness of Bioenergy Production and Effects on Agriculture of the Southern Region.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38,2(2006):389–402.Google Scholar
Epplin, F.M. “Cost to Produce and Deliver Switchgrass Biomass to an Ethanol-Conversion Facility in the Southern Plains of the United States.” Biomass and Bioenergy 11,6(1996): 459-67.Google Scholar
Fike, J.H., Parrish, D.J., Wolf, D.D., J.A., Balasko, Green, J.T. Jr., Rasnake, M., and Reynolds, J.H.. “Long-Term Yield Potential of Switchgrass-for-Biofuel Systems.” Biomass and Bioenergy 30,3(2006): 198–206.Google Scholar
Hess, J.R., Wright, C.>T., and Kenney, K.L.. “Cel-lulosic Biomass Feedstocks and Logistics for Ethanol Production.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1,3(2007): 181-90.Google Scholar
Jager, H.I., Baskaran, L.M., Brandt, C.C., Davis, E.B., Gunderson, C.A., and Wullschleger, S.D.. “Empirical Geographic Modeling of Switchgrass Yields in the United States.” GCB Bioenergy 2(2010): 248-57.Google Scholar
James, L.K., Swinton, S.M., and Thelen, K.D.. “Profitability Analysis of Cellulosic Energy Crops Compared with Corn.” Agronomy Journal 102,2(2010):675-87.Google Scholar
Jäppinen, E., Korpinen, O.-J., and Ranta, T.. “Effects of Local Biomass Availability and Road Network Properties on the Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biomass Supply Chain.” ISRN Renewable Energy 2011,189734(2011):6. doi:10.5402/2011/189734.Google Scholar
Jensen, K., Clark, C.D., Ellis, P., English, B., Menard, J., Walsh, M., and Ugarte, D.de la Torre. “Farmer Willingness to Grow Switchgrass for Energy Production.” Biomass and Bioenergy 31,11-12(2007):773-81.Google Scholar
Kondili, E., Pantelides, C., and Sargent, R.. “A General Algorithm for Short-Term Scheduling of Batch Operations—I. MILP Formulation.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 17,2(1993):211-27.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., and Sokhansanj, S.. “Switchgrass Delivery to a Biorefinery Using Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) Model.” Bioresource Technology 98,5(2007): 1033-44.Google Scholar
Kwon, H.-Y., Mueller, S., Dunn, J.B., and Wander, M.M.. “Modeling State-Level Soil Carbon Emission Factors under Various Scenarios for Direct Land Use Change Associated with United States Biofuel Feedstock Production.” Biomass and Bioenergy 55(2013): 299–310.Google Scholar
Larson, J.A., Yu, T.-H., English, B.C., Mooney, D.F., and Wang, C.. “Cost Evaluation of Alternative Switchgrass Producing, Harvesting, Storing, and Transporting Systems and Their Logistics in the Southeastern USA.” Agricultural Finance Review 70,2(2010): 184–200.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, I., Scurlock, J.M.O., Lindvall, E., and Christou, M.. “The Development and Current Status of Perennial Rhizomatous Grasses as Energy Crops in the US and Europe.” Biomass and Bioenergy 25,4(2003):335-61.Google Scholar
Malczewski, J. “GIS-Based Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Survey of the Literature.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 20,7(2006):703-26.Google Scholar
Mas, M.D., Giarola, S., Zamboni, A., and Bezzo, F.. “Capacity Planning and Financial Optimizationof the Bioethanol Supply Chain under Price Uncertainty.” Computer Aided Chemical Engineering 28(2010): 97–102.Google Scholar
Maung, T.A., and Gustafson, C.R.. “Economic Impact of Harvesting Corn Stover under Time Constraint: The Case of North Dakota.” Economics Research International 2013,321051(2013): 13. doi:10.1155/2013/321051.Google Scholar
Mavrotas, G. “Effective Implementation of the ε-Constraint Method in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming Problems.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 213,2(2009): 455-65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Vogel, K.P., and Sarath, G.. “Managing and Enhancing Switchgrass as a Bio-energy Feedstock.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2,6(2008):530-39.Google Scholar
Mooney, D.F., Larson, J.A., English, B.C., and Tyler, D.D.. “Effect of Dry Matter Loss on Profitability of Outdoor Storage of Switch-grass.” Biomass and Bioenergy 44(2012): 33–41.Google Scholar
Mooney, D.F., Roberts, R.K., English, B.C., Tyler, D.D., and Larson, J.A.. “Yield and Breakeven Price of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass for Biofuels in Tennessee.” Agronomy Journal 101,5(2009): 1234-42.Google Scholar
Noon, C., Zhan, F.B., and Graham, R.L.. “GIS-Based Analysis of Marginal Price Variation with an Application in the Identification of Candidate Ethanol Conversion Plant Locations.” Networks and Spatial Economics 2(2002): 79–93.Google Scholar
Parton, W. “The CENTURY model.” Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models: Using Existing Long-Term Datasets. Powlson, D.S., Smith, P. and Smith, J.U., eds. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 1996.Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Zhuang, Q., and Chen, M.. “Impacts of Land Use Change Due to Biofuel Crops on Carbon Balance, Bioenergy Production, and Agricultural Yield, in the Conterminous United States.” GCB Bioenergy 4,3(2011):277, -88.Google Scholar
Schimel, D., Ojima, D., Hartman, M., Parton, W., Brenner, J., Mosier, A., and Grosso, S.D.. “Simulated Interaction of Carbon Dynamics and Nitrogen Trace Gas Fluxes Using the DAYCENT Model.” Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management. Hansen, S., Shaffer, M.J., and Ma, L., eds. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press, 2001.Google Scholar
B., Sharma, Ingalls, R., Jones, C., and Khanchi, A.. “Biomass Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Basis, Overview, Modeling, Challenges, and Future.” Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 24(2013): 608-27.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Personal Communication, Director, Global Business, Tennessee Valley Authority, Industrial Park Database, March 2011.Google Scholar
Sokhansanj, S., Kumar, A., and Turhollow, A.F.. “Development and Implementation of Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics Model (IBSAL).” Biomass and Bioenergy 30,10(2006):838-47.Google Scholar
Tembo, G., Epplin, F.M., and Huhnke, R.L.. “Integrative Investment Appraisal of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28,3(2003): 611-33.Google Scholar
University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Guideline Switchgrass Establishment and Annual Production Budgets Over Three year Planning Horizon, AE10-02, Knoxville, TN. 2009. Internet site: http://economics.ag.utk.edu/budgets/2009/Switchgrass2009.pdf (Accessed July 9, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geographic Products Branch. Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (TIGER/Line®) Shapefiles. Internet site: www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger (Accessed November 5, 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Office of the Press Secretary, 2007. Internet site: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/B ILLS-110hr6enr.pdf (Accessed March 5, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. CropScape—Cropland Data Layer Database, 2011. Internet site: http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape (Assessed February 18, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Nature Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey Geographical Database (SSURGO). 2012. Internet site: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/ssurgo/ (Accessed March 10, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Crop Values Annual Summary, 2013a. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentlnfo.do?documentID=1050 (Assessed March 12, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Commodity Costs and Return Data, 2013b. Internet site: www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/commodity-costs-and-returns.aspx (Assessed Febraary 22, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. Roadmap for Bioenergy and Biobased Products in the United States, Report of the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy/Biomass Research and Development Initiative, 2007.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Billion-ton Update: Biomass Supply fora Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. Perlack, R.D. and Stokes, B.J. (Leads), Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/ TM-2011/224, 2011.Google Scholar
U.S. Environment Protection Agency. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) model. Internet site: www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm (Accessed March 10, 2013).Google Scholar
Wang, M., Saricks, C., and Santini, D.. Effects of Fuel Ethanol Use on Fuel-Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division. AN ESD-38, 1999.Google Scholar
Wright, L., and Turhollow, A.. “Switchgrass Selection as a “Model” Bioenergy Crop: A History of the Process.” Biomass and Bioenergy 34,6(2010):851-68.Google Scholar
You, F.., Tao, L., Graziano, D.J., and Snyder, S.W.. “Optimal Design of Sustainable Cellulosic Biofuel Supply Chains: Multiobjective Optimization Coupled with Life Cycle Assessment and Input—Output Analysis.” AIChE Journal 58,4(2012): 1157-80.Google Scholar
You, F., and Wang, B.. “Life Cycle Optimization of Biomass-to-Liquids Supply Chains with Distributed-Centralized Processing Networks.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50,17(2011):10102-27.Google Scholar
Yu, T.E., English, B.C., Larson, J.A., Fu, J.S., D. De La Torre Ugarte, , J.Yun, , Calcagno III, J., and Wilson, B.. “Modeling the Air Quality Impacts of Feedstocks Transportation for Cellulosic Biofuel Production in Tennessee.” TRB 92nd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, #13-1650, 2013. Internet site: http://trid.trb.org/view/1241104 (Accessed June 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Zakariazadeh, A., Jadid, S., and Siano, P.. “Economic-Environmental Energy and Reserve Scheduling of Smart Distribution Systems: A Multiobjective Mathematical Programming Approach.” Energy Conversion and Management 78(2014): 151-64.Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Johnson, D.M., and Sutherland, J.W.. “A GIS-Based Method for Identifying the Optimal Location for a Facility to Convert Forest Biomass to Biofuel.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35,9(2011):3951-61.Google Scholar