Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Consumer Preferences for Amount and Type of Fat in Ground Beef

  • Jayson L. Lusk (a1) and Natalie Parker (a1)
Abstract

Scientists and beef industry participants are investigating ways to improve the healthiness of beef. We report results of a nationwide mail survey developed to determine Consumers' preferences for fat content in ground beef and identify how consumers would most like to improve the healthiness of beef. The results from a choice-based conjoint experiment indicate that consumers place significant value on reducing saturated fat and the Omega 6:3 ratio in ground beef, but were relatively unconcerned about conjugated linoleic acid. The relatively new method of best-worst scaling was used to further identify which methods consumers most preferred producers use to improve fat content in beef. The results indicate consumers preferred feeding cattle a grass-fed diet as opposed to supplementing cattle feed with fish-meal or flaxseed to improve the fatty acid content in beef. Although consumers were receptive to the idea of using genetic testing to breed only those cattle with improved fatty acid content, using cloning to achieve this end, was viewed as very undesirable.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Boetel, B., and Liu, D.J.Evaluating the Effect of Generic Advertising and Food Health Information within a Meat Demand System.Agribusiness 19(2003):345–54.
Brester, G.W., Lhermite, P., Goodwin, B.K., and Hunt, M.C.Quantifying the Effects of New Product Development: The Case of Low-Fat Ground Beef.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(1993):239–50.
Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
Finn, A., and Louviere, J.J.Determining the Appropriate Response to Evidence of Public Concern: The Case of Food Safety.Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 11(1992):1225.
Flynn, T.N., Louviere, J.J., Peters, T.J., and Coast, J.Best-Worst Scaling: What It Can Do for Health Care Research and How to Do It.Journal of Health Economics 26(2007):171–89.
French, P., Stanton, C., Lawless, F., O'Riordan, E.G., Monahan, F.J., Caffrey, P.J., and Moloney, A.P.Fatty Acid Composition, Including Conjugated Linoleic Acid, of Intramuscular Fat from Steers Offered Grazed Grass, Grass Silage, or Concentrate-Based Diets.Journal of Animal Science 78(2000):284955.
Gillis, M.H., Duckett, S.K., and Sackman, J.R.Effects of Supplemental Rumen-Protected Conjugated Linoleic Acid or Corn Oil on Fatty Acid Composition in Beef Cattle.Journal of Animal Science 82(2004):141927.
Kinnucan, H.W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.J., and Jackson, J.D.Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997):1323.
Knight, Minick, T.J., Tait, R., Trenkle, A., Wilson, D., Rouse, G., Strohbehn, D., Reecy, J., and Beitz, D.Redesigning Beef Cattle to Have a More Healthful Fatty Acid Composition.” Iowa State University Animal Industry Report, 2004. A.S. Leaflet R1882. Internet site: http://www.iowa beefcenter.org/pdfs/BRR/R1882.pdf (Accessed October, 2007).
LMIC. Livestock Marketing Information Center, Lakewood, Colorado. Internet site: htrp://lmicl.co.nrcs.usda.gov.
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D.. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Lusk, J.L., Fields, D., and Prevatt, J.An Incentive Compatible Conjoint Ranking Mechanism.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2008):487–98.
Lusk, J.L., and Norwood, B.Effect of Experimental Design on Choice-Based Conjoint Valuation Estimates.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(2005):771–85.
Maddock, T.D., Bauer, M.L., Koch, K.B., Anderson, V.L., Maddock, R.J., Barceló-Coblijn, G., Murphy, E.J., and Lardy, G.P.Effect of Processing Flax in Beef Feedlot Diets on Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Trained Sensory Panel Ratings.Journal of Animal Science 84(2006):154451.
Mandeli, LB., Buchanan-Smith, J.G., Holub, B.J., and CP. Campbell. “Effects of Fish Meal in Beef Cattle Diets on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Fatty Acid Composition of Longissimus Muscle.Journal of Animal Science 75(1997):910–19.
Marley, A.A.J.and Louviere, J.J.Some Probabilistic Models of Best, Worst, and Best-Worst Choices.Journal of Mathematical Psychology 49(2005):464–80.
McCluskey, J.J., Wahl, T.L., Li, Q., and Wandschneider, P.R.U.S. Grass Fed Beef: Marketing Health Benefits.Journal of Food Distribution Research 36(2005):18.
McFadden, D.Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Frontiers in Econometrics. Zarembka, P., ed. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Mintert, J.Annual Beef Demand Index.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University. Internet site: http://www. agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/database/cattle/mtdemand.xls (Accessed October 1, 2007).
Parceli, J.L., and Schroeder, T.C.Hedonic Retail Beef and Pork Prices.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):2946.
Sawtooth Software. “The MaxDiff/Web System Technical Paper.” November, 2005 Internet site: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/maxdifftech.pdf (Accessed July 27, 2007).
Scollan, N.I. Richardson, I., Moloney, A., Dannenberger, D., Hocquette, J.F.I.Innovations in Beef Production Systems that Enhance the Nutritional and Health Value of Beef Lipids and their Relationship with Meat Quality.Meat Science 74(2006):1733.
Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, CR., and Killinger-Mann, K.U.S. Consumer Preference and Willingness-to-Pay for Domestic Corn-Fed Beef versus International Grass-Fed Beef Measured through an Experimental Auction.Agribusiness 18(2002):491504.
Unnevehr, L.J., and Bard, S.Beef Quality: Will Consumers Pay For Less Fat?Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(1993):288–95.
Verbeke, W., and Ward, R.W.A Fresh Meat Almost Ideal Demand System Incorporating Negative TV Press and Advertising Impact.Agricultural Economics 25(2001):359–74.
Ward, CE., Lusk, J.L., and Dutton, J.M.Implicit Value of Retail Beef Product Attributes.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 33(2008):364–81.
Ward, R.W.Beef Demand and the Rate-of-Return to the U.S. Beef Checkoff: Two Independent Evaluation Approaches.” Report to the Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board. Centennial, CO, September 2004. Internet site: http://www.beefboard.org/uDocs/ronwardstudy-9-2004.pdf (Accessed September 2008).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics
  • ISSN: 1074-0708
  • EISSN: 2056-7405
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-and-applied-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed