Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T22:19:43.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Student-to-Student Program: The Policy Fair

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Fred C. White
Fred C. White*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at theUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA
Get access

Abstract

Student participation in such instructional activities as presentations, panel discussions, and projects can be used to stimulate interest and learning. Such activities need not be limited to a single class. This paper describes potential linkages between selected classes in which students from upper level or graduate classes are used as instructional resources in other classes. The general approach, which is described as a student-to-student program, has been applied in a Policy Fair. The Policy Fair is described and evaluated in this paper. There was widespread support among faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates for the general concept and this specific application.

Keywords

teachingstudent involvementinstructional resourcesinnovative instructional techniquesgraduate and undergraduate education
Type
Note
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 1990 , pp. 195 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cronbach, Lee, and Snow, Richard. Aptitudes and Instructional Methods. New York, NY: Irvington, 1977.Google Scholar
Debertin, David L., Pagoulatos, Angelos, and Bradford, Garnett L.. “Computer Graphics: An Educational Tool in Production Economics.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977):573–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Herbert W. “Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility.” J. Ed. Psych., 76(1984):707–754.Google Scholar
McClelland, John W., and Broder, Josef M.. “Teaching Consumer Economics Using Taste Panels.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 14 (1982):91–96.Google Scholar
McKeachie, Wilbert J. Teaching Tips, A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co., 1978.Google Scholar
McKeachie, Wilbert J. “Instructional Evaluation: Current Issues and Possible Improvements (Commentary).” J. Higher Ed., 58(1987):344–350.Google Scholar
White, Fred C. “Simulation of Agricultural Policy Formation as a Teaching Approach.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 59(1977):225–227.Google Scholar