Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T06:57:03.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The availability of potassium in soils to crops as measured by its release to a calcium-saturated cation exchange resin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. W. T. Goulding
K. W. T. Goulding
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts. AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The amounts and rates of release of the different categories of soil K were measured on 21 soils from field experiments in England, Wales and West Germany using a calcium saturated cation exchange resin. The soils contained various amounts of exchangeable, fixed and matrix K; some contained no fixed K at all. These amounts could be qualitatively related to the clay contents of the soils.

Regression analyses of K removed at harvest by spring barley, winter wheat, field beans and sugar beet, grown in the field experiments, were made on the quantities measured by the Ca-resin method and on K exchangeable to M ammonium acetate (EK). The Ca-resin method proved a better predictor of K availability than EK for all four crops. A multiple regression of the amount and rate of release of exchangeable K, and the rate of release of fixed K, as measured by Ca-resin, gave the best correlation with K removed. The contribution of fixed K to the regression increased with the demand of the crop for K and with the length of time the crops had been grown without K fertilizer. For the cereals, fixed K appeared to be either completely available or unavailable depending on whether its rate of release exceeded a critical value characteristic of each crop.

The Ca-resin method is probably the best method available for measuring K reserves. It is, perhaps, too laborious for routine soil analysis, but could be used to characterize the long-term K release properties of a soil.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 265 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, P. W. (1960). Potassium uptake by cation exchange resins from soils and minerals. Nature 182, 1594–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. W. (1962). The potassium status of some English soils considered as a problem of energy relationships. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society, no. 72, pp. 25–43.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. W. & Close, B. M. (1961). Potassium-releasing power of soils from the Agdell rotation experiment assessed by glasshouse cropping. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 381–386.Google Scholar
Barber, T. E. & Mathews, B. C. (1962). Release of nonexchangeable soil potassium in resin equilibration and its significance for crop growth. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 42, 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, P. H. T. (1971). Residual potassium and magnesium: a review. In Residual Value of Applied Nutrients. Technical Bulletin No. 20, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 183–196. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. (1965). The relationship between crop response and the determination of soil phosphorus by chemical methods. II. In Soil Phosphorus. Technical Bulletin no. 13, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 94–102. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. & Frater, A. (1967). Analytical methods for potassium and their correlations with crop response. In Soil Potassium and Magnesium. Technical Bulletin no. 14, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 55–62. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. & Graham, J. P. (1979). Effects of direct drilling and shallow cultivation on the nutrient content of shoots of winter wheat and spring barley on clay soils during an unusually dry season. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1967). The Control of Soil Fertility, ch. 20, pp. 282–306. London: Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1979). Some priorities for British soil science. Journal of Soil Science 30, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, G. W. & Gething, P. A. (1978). Changing concepts on the use of potash. In Potassium Research-Review and Trends. Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the International Potash Institute, 1978, pp. 361–405.Google Scholar
Draycott, A. P., Durrant, M. J., Hull, R. & Messem, A. B. (1977). Changes in Broom's Barn Farm soils, 1960–75. In Rothamsled Report for 1976, part 2, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Eagle, D. J. (1963). Potassium available to plants. Nature 198, 558–560.Google Scholar
Eagle, D. J. (1967). Release of non-exchangeable potassium from certain soils. In Soil Potassium and Magnesium. Technical Bulletin no. 14, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 49–54. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Goulding, K. W. T. (1981). Potassium retention and release in Rothamsted and Saxmundham soils. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 667–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haylock, O. F. (1956). A method for estimating the availability of nonexchangeable potassium. In Transactions of the Sixth International Congress of Soil Science, Paris, vol. II, 1, pp. 403–408.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D. R. & Martin, J. C. (1933). Absorption of potassium by plants in relation to replaceable, nonreplaceable and soil solution potassium. Soil Science 36, 1–32.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E. (1969). Plant nutrients in Broadbalk soils. In Rothamsted Report for 1968, part 2, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. E., Warren, R. G. & Penny, A. (1970). The value of residues from long-period manuring at Rothamsted and Woburn. V. The value to arablecrops of residues accumulated from potassium fertilisers. In Rothamsted Report for 1969, part 2, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
MacLean, A. J. (1961). Potassium-supplying power of some Canadian soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 41, 196–206.Google Scholar
Metson, A. J. (1956). Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin, no. 12.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1973). The flame photometric determination of extractable potassium in soil. In The Analysis of Agricultural Materials. Technical Bulletin no. 27. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. & Tinker, P. B. (1977). Solute Movement in the Soil-Root System. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Ralph, R. L. & Ridgman, W. J. (1981). A study of the effects of potassium fertilizer with special reference to wheat on boulder-clay soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 261–296.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980). MLP: Maximum Likelihood Program. Harpenden: Rothamsted Experimental Station. 256 pp.Google Scholar
Russell, R. D. (1967). Analytical methods for potassium and their correlation with crop response on the Sherborne soil series. In Soil Potassium and Magnesium. Technical Bulletin no. 14, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 86–96. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Russell, R. D. & Batey, T. (1971). Residual effects of potassium fertilisers in five rotation experiments. In Residual Value of Applied Nutrients. Technical Bulletin no. 20, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 197–219. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Semb, G. & Uhlen, G. (1955). A comparison of different analytical methods for the determination of K and P in soil based on field experiments. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 5, 44–68.Google Scholar
Singh, K. D., Goulding, K. W. T. & Sinclair, A. H. (1983). Assessment of potassium in soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 14, 1015–1033.Google Scholar
Talibudeen, O., Beasley, J. D., Lane, P. & Rajendran, N. (1978). Assessment of soil potassium reserves available to plant roots. Journal of Soil Science 29, 207–218.Google Scholar
Talibudeen, O. & Dey, S. K. (1968). Potassium reserves in British soils. I. The Rothamsted Classical Experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Cooke, G. W. (1962). Comparisons between methods of measuring soluble phosphorus and potassium in soils used for fertilizer experiments on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 59, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1972). Results from the Woburn Reference Experiment, 1960–69. In Rothamsted Report for 1971, part 2, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1973). Yields and N, P and K contents of the crops grown in the Rothamsted Reference Experiment, 1956–70. In Rothamsted Report for 1972, part 2, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1976). The chemical composition of rain, land drainage and borehole water from Rothamsted, Broom's Barn, Saxmundham and Woburn Experimental Stations. In Agriculture and Water Quality. Technical Bulletin no. 32, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 174–200. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. & Cooke, G. W. (1971). Results of the Rotation I Experiment at Saxmundham, 1964–69. In Rothamsted Report for 1970, part 2, pp. 68–97.Google Scholar