Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T15:12:01.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of a dynamic, mechanistic, thermal balance model for Bos indicus and Bos taurus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2013

V. A. THOMPSON ,
L. G. BARIONI ,
T. R. RUMSEY ,
J. G. FADEL  and
R. D. SAINZ
V. A. THOMPSON
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
L. G. BARIONI
Affiliation:
Computational Mathematics Laboratory, Embrapa Agricultural Informatics, Campinas-SP, Brazil
T. R. RUMSEY
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
J. G. FADEL
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
R. D. SAINZ*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: rdsainz@ucdavis.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The dynamic model presented in the current paper estimates heat production and heat flow between growing and mature cattle (Bos indicus and Bos taurus) and the surrounding environment. Heat production was calculated using the NRC (2000) and heat flows between the animal and the environment were based largely on existing models and physical principles. Heat flows among the body core, the skin, the coat and the environment were calculated. Heat flows from and to the environment included solar radiation, long wave radiation, convection and evaporative heat loss. Physiological responses of cattle (sweating, panting and vasodilation) were modelled through mechanistic equations. The model required weather (radiation, temperature, wind and vapour pressure), animal (body-core weight and genotype-specific parameters) and dietary inputs (dry matter intake rates and diet composition) and estimated heat balance and the physiological responses of the animal to within-day weather variation. The current paper has focused on heat stress, although the model was designed to run under both hot and cold climatic conditions. The model developed in the current paper provides researchers and livestock producers with the ability to predict heat stress and to evaluate mitigating procedures.

Information

Type
Modelling Animal Systems Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 152 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 464 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Albright, L. D. (1990). Environment Control for Animals and Plants. St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.Google Scholar
Allen, T. E. (1962). Responses of Zebu, Jersey, and Zebu X Jersey crossbred heifers to rising temperature, with particular reference to sweating. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 165–179.Google Scholar
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE) (2006). Dimensions of Livestock and Poultry. ASAE Livestock Dimension and Configuration Factors Subcommittee, ASAE Structures and Environment Division Technical Committee. ASAE Standard D321.2 MAR1985 (R2006). St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE.Google Scholar
Bakken, G. S. (1976). A heat transfer analysis of animals: unifying concepts and the application of metabolism chamber data to field ecology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 60, 337–384.Google Scholar
Beatty, D. T., Barnes, A., Taylor, E., Pethick, D., Mccarthy, M. & Maloney, S. K. (2006). Physiological responses of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle to prolonged, continuous heat and humidity. Journal of Animal Science 84, 972–985.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackshaw, J. K. & Blackshaw, A. W. (1994). Heat stress in cattle and the effect of shade on production and behaviour: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 285–295.Google Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bioenergetics and Growth: with Special Reference to the Efficiency Complex in Domestic Animals. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Brown-Brandl, T. M., Nienaber, J. A., Eigenberg, R. A., Hahn, G. L. & Freetly, H. (2003). Thermoregulatory responses of feeder cattle. Journal of Thermal Biology 28, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Brandl, T. M., Eigenberg, R. A., Nienaber, J. A. & Hahn, G. L. (2005). Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle, Part 1: analyses of indicators. Biosystems Engineering 90, 451–462.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M. & Clark, J. J. (1979). Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Animal Production 28, 353–369.Google Scholar
Brutsaert, W. (1975). Derivable formula for long-wave radiation from clear skies. Water Resources Research 11, 742–744.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. S., McArthur, A. J. & Monteith, J. L. (1980). Windspeed dependence of heat and mass transfer through coats and clothing. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 18, 485–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cena, K. & Clark, J. A. (1978). Thermal insulation of animal coats and human clothing. Physics in Medicine & Biology 23, 565–591.Google Scholar
Cena, K. & Monteith, J. L. (1975). Transfer processes in animal coats. III. Water vapour diffusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 188, 413–423.Google Scholar
Cesaraccio, C., Spano, D., Duce, P. & Snyder, R. L. (2001). An improved model for determining degree-day values from daily temperature data. International Journal of Biometeorology 45, 161–169.Google Scholar
CIMIS (2009). California Irrigation Management Information System Department of Water Resources. Sacramento, CA, USA: Office of Water Use Efficiency. Available from: http://wwwcimis.water.ca.gov/cimis/welcome.jsp (verified 30 May 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, T. M. & Duchon, C. E. (1999). An improved parameterization for estimating effective atmospheric emissivity for use in calculating daytime downwelling longwave radiation. Journal of Applied Meteorology 38, 474–480.Google Scholar
Crosbie, R. J., Hardy, J. D. & Fessenden, E. (1961). Electrical analog simulation of temperature regulation in man. IRE Transactions on Bio-Medical Electronics 8, 245–252.Google Scholar
Da Silva, R. G. (2000). Introdução à Bioclimatologia Animal. São Paulo, Brazil: Nobel.Google Scholar
Da Silva, R. G. (2008). Biofisica Ambiental: Os Animais e seu Ambiente. São Paulo, Brazil: Funep.Google Scholar
Doherty, T. J. & Arens, E. A. (1988). Evaluation of the physiological bases of thermal comfort models. ASHRAE Transactions 94, 1371–1385.Google Scholar
Duffie, J. A. & Beckman, W. A. (1991). Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ehrlemark, A. (1988). Calculation of sensible heat and moisture loss from housed cattle using heat balance model. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Farm Buildings, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Finch, V. A. (1985). Comparison of non-evaporative heat transfer in different cattle breeds. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagge, A. P. & Gonzalez, R. R. (2010). Mechanisms of heat exchange: biophysics and physiology. In Comprehensive Physiology (Ed. Terjung, R.), pp. 45–84. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Gagge, A. P., Stolwijk, J. A. J. & Nishi, Y. (1971). An effective temperature scale based on a simple model of human physiological regulatory response. ASHRAE Transactions 77, 247–262.Google Scholar
Gaughan, J. B., Mader, T. L., Holt, S. M., Josey, M. J. & Rowan, K. J. (1999). Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2398–2405.Google Scholar
Gaur, G. K., Kaushik, S. N. & Garg, R. C. (2002). Ongole cattle status in India. Animal Genetic Resources Information 32, 27–34.Google Scholar
Gebremedhin, K. G. (1987). Effect of animal orientation with respect to wind direction on convective heat-loss. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 40, 199–206.Google Scholar
Gebremedhin, K. G., Hillman, P. E., Lee, C. N., Collier, R. J., Willard, S. T., Arthington, J. & Brown-Brandl, T. M. (2008). Sweating rates of dairy cows and beef heifers in hot conditions. Transactions of the ASABE 51, 2167–2178.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. J. (2004). Physiological and cellular adaptations of zebu cattle to thermal stress. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 349–360.Google Scholar
Hasson, A. M., Al-Hamadani, N. I. & Al-Karaghouli, A. A. (1990). Comparison between measured and calculated diurnal variations of wind speeds in northeast Baghdad. Solar & Wind Technology 7, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. C. D. & Brown, G. D. (1969). Penetrance of cattle coats by radiation. Journal of Applied Physiology 26, 454–464.Google Scholar
Huizenga, C., Hui, Z. & Arens, E. (2001). A model of human physiology and comfort for assessing complex thermal environments. Building and Environment 36, 691–699.Google Scholar
Incropera, F. P. & Dewitt, D. P. (1990). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. S. (1954). The solar constant. Journal of Meteorology 11, 431–439.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. E., Hamblin, F. B. & Schrader, G. T. (1958). Factors concerned in the comparative heat tolerance of Jersey, Holstein and Red Sindhi-Holstein (F1) cattle. Journal of Animal Science 17, 473–479.Google Scholar
Kaynakli, O. & Kilic, M. (2005). An investigation of thermal comfort inside an automobile during the heating period. Applied Ergonomics 36, 301–312.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. F., Bond, T. E. & Heitman, H. Jr (1954). The role of thermal radiation in animal ecology. Ecology 35, 562–569.Google Scholar
Kibler, H. H. & Yeck, R. G. (1959). Environmental Physiology and Shelter Engineering with Special Reference to Domestic Animals L: Vaporization Rates and Heat Tolerance in Growing Shorthorn, Brahman and Santa Gertrudis Calves Raised at Constant 50° and 80°F Temperatures. Missouri Research Bulletin 701. Columbia, MO, USA: University of Missouri, College of Agriculture Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Maia, A. S. C., Da Silva, R. G. & Loureiro, C. M. B. (2008). Latent heat loss of Holstein cows in a tropical environment: a prediction model. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science 37, 1837–1843.Google Scholar
MATLAB (2010). Matlab Version 7.8.0. Natick, MA, USA: MathWorks Inc.Google Scholar
McArthur, A. J. (1987). Thermal interaction between animal and microclimate: a comprehensive model. Journal of Theoretical Biology 126, 203–238.Google Scholar
McArthur, A. J. (1991). Thermal-radiation exchange, convection and the storage of latent-heat in animal coats. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 53, 325–336.Google Scholar
McArthur, A. J. & Monteith, J. L. (1980). Air movement and heat loss from sheep. II. Thermal insulation of fleece in wind. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 209, 209–217.Google Scholar
McDowell, R. E., McDaniel, B. T. & Hooven, N. W. (1958). Relation of the rhomboideus (hump) muscle in zebu and European type cattle. Journal of Animal Science 17, 1229 (abstract).Google Scholar
McGovern, R. E. & Bruce, J. M. (2000). A model of the thermal balance for cattle in hot conditions. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 77, 81–92.Google Scholar
Mitloehner, F. M. & Laube, R. B. (2003). Chronobiological indicators of heat stress in Bos indicus cattle in the tropics. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2, 654–659.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1973). Principles of Environmental Physics, 1st edn, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. & Unsworth, M. H. (2008). Principles of Environmental Physics, 3rd edn, Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Murray, F. W. (1967). On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. Journal of Applied Meteorology 6, 203–204.Google Scholar
Myers, G. E. (1971). Analytical Methods in Conduction Heat Transfer. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
NRC (1984). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 6th edn, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
NRC (2000). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th edn, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, M. P. & Spotila, J. R. (1992). Consider a spherical lizard: animals, models, and approximations. American Zoologist 32, 179–193.Google Scholar
Olson, R. M. (1962). Essentials of Engineering Fluid Mechanics. Scranton, PA, USA: International Textbook Co.Google Scholar
Oyarzun, R. A., Stockle, C. O. & Whiting, M. D. (2007). A simple approach to modeling radiation interception by fruit-tree orchards. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, 12–24.Google Scholar
Pan, Y. S. (1963). Quantitative and morphological variation of sweat glands, skin thickness, and skin shrinkage over various body regions of Sahiwal Zebu and Jersey cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 424–437.Google Scholar
Peterson, T. C. & Parton, W. J. (1983). Diurnal-variations of wind speeds at a shortgrass prairie site – a model. Agricultural Meteorology 28, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, W. P. & Gates, D. M. (1969). Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment. Ecological Monographs 39, 227–244.Google Scholar
Sen, Z. (2008). Solar Energy Fundamentals and Modeling Techniques: Atmosphere, Environment, Climate Change, and Renewable Energy. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Shampine, L. F., Reichelt, M. W. & Kierzenka, J. A. (1999). Solving index-1 DAEs in MATLAB and Simulink. SIAM Review 41, 538–552.Google Scholar
Singh, G., Gaur, G. K., Nivsarkar, A. E., Patil, G. R. & Mitkari, K. R. (2002). Deoni cattle breed of India. A study on population dynamics and morphometric characteristics. Animal Genetic Resources Information 32, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolwijk, J. A. J. & Hardy, J. D. (1966). Temperature regulation in man – a theoretical study. Pflügers Archiv (European Journal of Physiology) 291, 129–162.Google Scholar
Takada, S., Kobayashi, H. & Matsushita, T. (2009). Thermal model of human body fitted with individual characteristics of body temperature regulation. Building and Environment 44, 463–470.Google Scholar
Thom, E. C. & Bosen, J. F. (1959). The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12, 57–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. K. & Pearson, R. A. (1986). Effects of ambient-temperature and head cooling on energy-expenditure, food-intake and heat tolerance of Brahman and Brahman x Friesian cattle working on treadmills. Animal Production 43, 83–90.Google Scholar
Thompson, V. A., Fadel, J. G. & Sainz, R. D. (2011). Meta-analysis to predict sweating and respiration rates for Bos indicus, Bos taurus, and their crossbreds. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3973–3982.Google Scholar
Thompson, V. A., Sainz, R. D., Strathe, A. B., Rumsey, T. R. & Fadel, J. G. (in press). The evaluation of a dynamic, mechanistic, thermal balance model for Bos indicus and Bos taurus. Cambridge: Journal of Agricultural Science.Google Scholar
Turco, S. H. N., da Silva, T. G. F., de Oliveira, G. M., Leitão, M. M. V. B. R., de Moura, M. S. B., Pinheiro, C. & Padilha, C. V., da, S. (2008). Estimating black globe temperature based on meteorological data. In Livestock Environments VIII. Proceedings of the Eighth ASABE International Livestock Environment Symposium, 31 August – 4 September 2008, Iguassu, Brazil, pp. 783–788. St. Joseph, MI, USA: ASABE.Google Scholar
Turnpenny, J. R., McArthur, A. J., Clark, J. A. & Wathes, C. M. (2000 a). Thermal balance of livestock 1. A parsimonious model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 101, 15–27.Google Scholar
Turnpenny, J. R., Wathes, C. M., Clark, J. A. & McArthur, A. J. (2000 b). Thermal balance of livestock 2. Applications of a parsimonious model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 101, 29–52.Google Scholar
Vera, R. R., Koong, L. J. & Morris, J. G. (1975). A model of heat flow in the sheep exposed to high levels of solar radiation. Computer Programs in Biomedicine 4, 214–218.Google Scholar
Voelker, C., Hoffmann, S., Kornadt, O., Arens, E., Zhang, H. & Huizenga, C. (2009). Heat and moisture transfer through clothing. In Building Simulation 2009: Proceedings of the 11th IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 27–30 July 2009, pp. 1360–1366. Glasgow, UK: IBPSA. Available from: http://www.ibpsa.org/m_bs2009.asp (verified 30 May 2013).Google Scholar
Zhang, J. H., Gupta, A. & Baker, J. (2007). Effect of relative humidity on the prediction of natural convection heat transfer coefficients. Heat Transfer Engineering 28, 335–342.Google Scholar