Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T12:38:04.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drought tolerance in potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Joyce R. A. Steckel  and
D. Gray
Joyce R. A. Steckel
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, U.K.
D. Gray
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In field experiments made over 3 years Pentland Crown and Majestic gave, in general, higher total and dry matter yields from plots given no supplementary water and protected from rainfall throughout growth than King Edward or Maris Piper. However, on plots kept at or near to field capacity all varieties gave similar yields. Pentland Crown and Majestic were deeper rooting than the other two varieties at the time of tuber formation (when the production of new roots ceased) but the differences in rooting depth (ca. 100 mm) between the varieties were small. Except for the top 150 mm of soil, differences in water extraction between the varieties throughout the profile were also small. Neither these differences in water extraction nor the differences in rooting depth could be related consistently to the differences in varietal yield response between ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ plots.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 375 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anon. (1969). Mobile plot shelters. Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1968, plate 4.Google Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. & Thompson, R. (1969). Some effects of plant spacing on potato quality. European Potato Journal 12, 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Taha, M. A. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. I. The effects of variety, seed size, and spacing on growth, development and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Roo, H. C. (1969). Tillage and root growth. In Proceedings of 15th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, 1968. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Love, B. J. G., Messem, A. B. & Draycott, A. P. (1973). Growth of crop roots in relation to soil moisture extraction. Annals of Applied Biology 74, 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, J. M. (1970) Relationship of root extension to the soil moisture level required for maximum yield of potatoes, tomatoes and corn Canadian Journal of Soil Science 50, 92–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruska, L., Majorova, B. & Nohejl, J. (1961). The development of the root system of the potato in its growing phases and its relation to soil humidity and cultivation. European Potato Journal 4, 97.Google Scholar
Hurd, E. A. (1974). Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agricultural Meteorology 14, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inforzato, R. & Nobrega, S. de A. (1964). The root system of the potato. Bragantia 21, 95–98.Google Scholar
Lesczynski, D. B. & Tanner, C. B. (1976). Seasonal variation of root distribution of irrigated field grown Russet Burbank potato. American Potato Journal 53, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, W. S. (1969). The East Mailing root-observation laboratories. In Root Orowth: Proceedings of the 15th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, 1968. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Roztropowicz, S. (1972). Pre-sprouting as a factor influencing development of potato root systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Triennial Conference of European Association of Potato Research, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Troughton, A. & Whittington, W. J. (1969). The significance of genetic variation in root systems. In Root Growth: Proceedings of the 15th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham, 1968. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Vel'Yaminov-Zernov, V. N. (1974). The protecting reactions of potatoes under drought conditions. Field Crop Abstracts (1975), 6652.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. E. & Clements, F. E. (1938). Plant Ecology, 2nd edn., New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Annual Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1974). Some effects of seed size and spacing on the yield and grading of two maincrop potato varieties. I. Final yield and its relation to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978). ‘Seed’ tuber production and management. In The Potato Crop – A scientific basis for improvement, chap. 8 (ed. Harris, P. M.). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar