Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:40:19.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of foliar-applied nitrogen fertilizer on oilseed rape (Brassica napus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2013

C. A. WHITE ,
S. E. ROQUES  and
P. M. BERRY
C. A. WHITE*
Affiliation:
ADAS, Gleadthorpe, Netherfield Lane, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Nottingham, NG20 9PD, UK
S. E. ROQUES
Affiliation:
ADAS, Boxworth, Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
P. M. BERRY
Affiliation:
ADAS, High Mowthorpe, Malton, North Yorkshire YO17 8BP, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: charlotte.white@adas.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects on yield, oil concentration and nitrogen (N) uptake efficiency of N fertilizer applied to the foliage of oilseed rape during and soon after flowering. Four field experiments were conducted in the UK during the 2008/09 and 2009/10 seasons which investigated six rates of soil-applied N (ammonium nitrate) ranging from 0 to 280 or 320 kg N/ha with each treatment followed by 0 or 40 kg/ha of foliar N applied as a solution of urea at the end of flowering. Each experiment also investigated five rates of foliar N ranging from 0 to 120 kg N/ha applied at the end of flowering and five timings of foliar N (40 kg N/ha) from mid-flowering to 2 weeks after the end of flowering.

Foliar N at 40 kg N/ha applied at the end of flowering significantly increased the seed yield in three of the four experiments. The seed yield increase across all four experiments was 0·25 t/ha (range of 0–0·41 t/ha). In two experiments, the increase in seed yield in response to foliar N occurred irrespective of whether it followed sub-optimal or super-optimal rates of soil-applied N; in one experiment there was a greater response at sub-optimal soil-applied N rates. The foliar N treatment reduced the seed oil concentration by 11 g/kg and increased seed protein concentration by 11 g/kg. Similar yield responses were observed for foliar N applications between mid-flowering and 2 weeks after the end of flowering. The efficiency with which foliar N was taken up into the plant varied between 0 and 100% with an average uptake efficiency across the four experiments of 61%.

Type
Crops and Soils Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 42 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon (2010). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops, 8th edn. DEFRA Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Anon (2012). HGCA Recommended List 2011/12 for Cereals and Oilseeds. Stoneleigh, Warwickshire, UK: Home Grown Cereals Authority. Available from: http://www.hgca.com (verified 19 August 2013).Google Scholar
Barraclough, P. B. (1989). Root growth, macro-nutrient uptake dynamics and soil fertility requirements of a high yielding winter oilseed rape crop. Plant and Soil 119, 59–70.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M. & Spink, J. H. (2006). A physiological analysis of oilseed rape yields: past and future. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 144, 381–392.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M. & Spink, J. H. (2009). ‘Canopy Management’ and Late Nitrogen Applications to Improve Yield of Oilseed Rape. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Project Report No 447. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Berry, P. M., Spink, J. H., Foulkes, M. J. & White, P. J. (2010). The physiological basis of genotypic differences in nitrogen use efficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Research 119, 365–373.Google Scholar
Bilsborrow, P. E., Evans, E. J. & Zhao, F. J. (1993). The influence of spring nitrogen on yield, yield components and glucosinolate content of autumn-sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreccer, M. F., Schapendonk, A. H. C. M., Slafer, G. A. & Rabbinge, R. (2000). Comparative response of wheat and oilseed rape to nitrogen supply: absorption and utilisation efficiency of radiation and nitrogen during the reproductive stages determining yield. Plant and Soil 220, 189–205.Google Scholar
Gooding, M. J. (2005). Foliar Urea Fertilisation and the Management of Yield and Quality in Wheat. Proceedings No.573. Leek, UK: The International Fertilizer Society.Google Scholar
Gooding, M. J., & Davies, W. P. (1992). Foliar urea fertilisation of cereals: a review. Fertiliser Research 32, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J., Gregory, P. J., Ford, K. E. & Ruske, R. E. (2007). Recovery of nitrogen from different sources following applications to winter wheat at and after anthesis. Field Crops Research 100, 143–154.Google Scholar
Hocking, P. J., Kirkegarrd, J. A., Angus, J. F., Gibson, A. H. & Koetz, E. A. (1997 a). Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Research 49, 107–125.Google Scholar
Hocking, P. J., Randall, P. J. & Demarco, D. (1997 b). The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilisation of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Research 54, 201–220.Google Scholar
Horst, W. J., Behrens, T., Heuberger, H., Kamh, M., Reidenbach, G. & Wiesler, F. (2003). Genotypic differences in nitrogen use-efficiency in crop plants. In Innovative Soil-plant Systems for Sustainable Agricultural Production (Eds Lynch, J. M., Schepers, J. S. & Ünver, I.), pp. 75–92. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
Humpherson-Jones, F. M. & Burchill, R. T. (1982). Chemical suppression of the sexual stage of Leptosphaeria maculans on oil-seed rape and turnip seed crop straw. Annals of Applied Biology 100, 281–288.Google Scholar
Knight, S., Kightley, S., Bingham, I., Hoad, S., Lang, B., Philpott, H., Stobart, R., Thomas, J., Barnes, A. & Ball, B. (2012). Desk Study to Evaluate Contributory Causes of the Current ‘Yield Plateau’ in Wheat and Oilseed Rape. Home-Grown Cereals Authority Project Report No 502. London: HGCA.Google Scholar
Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J. & Jackson, W. A. (1982). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilisation. Agronomy Journal 74, 562–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nix, J. (2011). The John Nix Farm Management Pocketbook, 42nd edn. (2012). Melton Mowbray, UK: Agro Business Consultants Ltd.Google Scholar
Rathke, G. -W., Behrens, T. & Diepenbrock, W. (2006). Integrated nitrogen management strategies to improve seed yield, oil content and nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassixa napus L.): a review. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117, 80–108.Google Scholar
Roques, S. E., Clarke, S. & Berry, P. M. (2011). Predicting the optimum rate and timing of nitrogen fertiliser for winter oilseed rape. In 13th International Rapeseed Congress IV, p. 71. Prague, 5–9 June 2011. Prague, Czech Republic: SPZO s.r.o.Google Scholar
Sattelmacher, B., Horst, W. J. & Becker, H. C. (1994). Factors that contribute to genetic variation for nutrient efficiency of crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 157, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieling, K., Schröder, H. & Hanus, H. (1998). Mineral and slurry nitrogen effects on yield, N uptake, and apparent N-use efficiency of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 130, 165–172.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. R. & De Witt, C. T. (1975). Photosynthate and nitrogen requirements for seed production by various crops. Science 189, 565–567.Google Scholar
Spink, J. H. & Berry, P. M. (2005). Yield of UK oilseed rape: physiological and technological constraints, and expectations of progress to 2010. In Proceedings of the 61st Easter School (Eds Wiseman, J. & Bradley, R.), pp. 311–334. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Kindred, D. R. (2009). Analysing nitrogen responses of cereals to prioritise routes to the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1939–1951.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, R. & Makepeace, R. J. (1984). A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Aspects of Applied Biology 6, 399–419.Google Scholar
Varga, B. & Svečnjak, Z. (2006). The effect of late-season urea spraying on grain yield and quality of winter wheat cultivars under low and high basal nitrogen fertilisation. Field Crops Research 96, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang-Yuen, P., Tlustos, P., Balik, J. & Vanek, V. (1999). Effects of magnesium and nitrogen foliar fertiliser on oilseed rape. Rostlinna Vyroba 45, 299–303.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Evans, E. J., Bilsborrow, P. E. & Syers, J. K. (1993). Influence of sulphur and nitrogen on seed yield and quality of low glucosinolate oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 63, 29–37.Google Scholar