Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:40:55.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes

I. Growth of the products of conception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. J. Robinson ,
I. McDonald ,
C. Fraser  and
R. M. J. Crofts
R. M. J. Crofts
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen A B2 9SB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Seventy-nine Finnish Landrace x Dorset Horn ewes in lamb to Suffolk rams were used in a comparative slaughter experiment to assess the effects of numbers of foetuses on the growth of the products of conception. The mean number of foetuses was 2·7, with a range from 1 to 5. The ewes were individually penned and given a standard diet with metabolizable energy concentration 7·7 MJ/kg and N concentration 21 g/kg, rationed at 2 kg/day during the first month and 1·25 kg/day during the second and third. Allowances beyond that time were on two scales and depended on the number of foetuses being carried as diagnosed by radiography. The ewes were slaughtered between 50 and 145 days of gestation. The gravid uterus was dissected into foetal, placental, foetal fluid and empty uterus components. Equations were fitted to the weights of each component to describe the effects of stage of gestation, litter size and ewe weight. For the mean weight per foetus (Y, kg) the preferred equation is

In (Y)= 2·419–17·574e-0.01976t–00079ft+0–0046w,

where tis the time in days from conception, / is the number of foetuses and wis the weight (kg) of the ewe at mating. This is a version of the Gompertz equation, with additional terms to express the effects of / and w.The weights of the placenta and of the empty uterus were similarly fitted by versions of the Gompertz equation but the mean weight of fluids per foetus (Z, kg) or, rather, its natural logarithm was best described by a third degree polynomial, which is

In(Z) = –11·518 + 0–326t;–0·00316t2+0·0000102t3.

None of the weights was significantly affected by the level of feeding in late pregnancy.

Estimates of mean weights from the equations and of daily rates of gain in weight from the first differentials of the equations are tabulated against stage of gestation and litter size, and the forms of the weight, growth rate and specific growth-rate curves are illustrated graphically.

The equation for foetal weight estimates that at the end of pregnancy the mean weight per foetus is reduced by a factor of 0–89 for each additional foetus being carried. The mathematical model implies that the differences originate in early pregnancy, when the factor is very close to unity, and that the mean weights gradually diverge. In the absence of direct evidence this would appear to be the simplest hypothesis, rather than the assumption in most of the earlier literature that the effect is entirely confined to the last 4 or 5 weeks of gestation.

Just before parturition the total daily weight gain of quadruplet foetuses was about 250 g and was associated with a similar gain in weight of foetal fluids, the ratio of fluid weight to foetal weight appearing to increase with litter size. The ewes were clearly under considerable physical stress. It is suggested that this aspect must be closely considered when greater prolificacy is sought.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 539 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, G. (1964). Studies on the placenta of the sheep (Ovis ariesL.) Placental size. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 7, 289–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baroroft, J. (1946). Researches on Pre-Natal Life, vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. D. & Hamilton, W. J. (1952). Cleavage, early development and implantation of the egg. In Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, vol. II (ed. Parkes, A. S.), pp. 1–126. London, New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Bradford, G. E., Taylor, , St, C. S., Qtjirke, J. F. & Hart, B. (1974). An egg-transfer study of litter size, birth weight and lamb survival. Animal Production 18, 249–63.Google Scholar
Caton, D., Wilcox, C. J., Abrams, B. & BARRON, D. H. (1975). The circulating plasma volume of the foetal lamb as an index of its weight and rate of weight gain (g/day) in the last third of gestation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 60, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloetb, J. H. L. (1939). Prenatal growth in the Merino sheep. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 13, 417–558.Google Scholar
Curson, H. H. & Malan, A. P. (1935). Studies in sex physiology. 13. The changing proportions of the Merino lamb from the second to the fifth month of prenatal life. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Industry 4, 481–94.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P., Bead, J. L. & Bussell, W. S. (1968) A comparative trial of crossbred ewes by Finnish Landraoe and other sires. Animal Production 10, 413–21.Google Scholar
Donald, H. P. & Russell, W. S. (1970). The relationship between live weight of ewe at mating and weight of newborn lamb. Animal Production 12, 273–80.Google Scholar
El-Sheikh, A. S., Hulet, C. V., Pope, A. L. & CASIDA, L.E. (1955). The effect of level of feeding on the reproductive capacity of the ewe. Journal of Animal Science 14, 919–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Footb, W. C., Pope, A. L., Chapman, A. B. & Casida, L. E. (1959). Beproduction in the yearling ewe as affected by breed and sequence of feeding levels. II. Effects on foetal development. Journal of Animal Science 18, 463–74.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. ST G. & Widdas, W. F. (1951). The relationship between mammalian foetal weight and conception age. Journal of Physiology 114, 306–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulet, C. V., Foote, W. C. & Pbioe, D. A. (1969). Factors affecting growth of ovine foetuses during early gestation. Animal Production 11, 219–23.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. (1956). A study of prenatal growth and development in the sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 47, 382–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. & Stuart, A. (1961). The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 2, p. 68. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Koong, L. J., Garrett, W. N. & Battray, P. V. (1975). A description of the dynamics of fetal growth in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 41, 1065–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laird, A. K. (1966). Dynamics of embryonic growth. Growth 30, 263–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Laird, A. K., Tyler, S. A. & Barton, A. D. (1965) Dynamics of normal growth. Growth 29, 233–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1968). An estimate of the nutrients utilized for pregnancy by Merino sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 217–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leitch, I., Hytten, F. E. & Billewicz, W. Z. (1959). The maternal and neonatal weights of some mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London 133, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, G. A. & Heaney, D. P. (1973). Composition of weight change in the pregnant ewe. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, B. W. (1960). Infertility and neonatal mortality in the sow. III. Neonatal mortality and foetal development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 54, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., East, N. E. & Hinman, N. (1974). Growth, development and composition of the ovine conceptus and mammary gland during pregnancy. Journal of Animal Science 38, 613–26.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Bobinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & Mchattie, I. (1976). Ovulation rate and embryo survival at a hormonally induced oestrus in Finnish Landrace x Dorset Horn ewes. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 5, 137–8.Google Scholar
Bobinson, J. J. (1974). Intensifying ewe productivity. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 3, 31–40.Google Scholar
Bobinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & Bennett, C. (1971). An assessment of the energy requirements of the pregnant ewe using plasma free fatty acid concentrations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 141–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & Mchattie, I. (1975). The use of progestagens and photoperiodism in improving the reproductive rate of the ewe. Annales de Biologie animate, Biochemie, Biophysique 15, 345–52.Google Scholar
Bobinson, J. J. & Orskov, E. B. (1975). An integrated approach to improving the biological efficiency of sheep meat production. World Review of Animal Production 11, 63–76.Google Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E. (1968). Prenatal development in the pig and some other multiparous animals. In Growth and Development of Mammals(ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.), pp. 158–91. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Stegeman, J. H. J. (1974). Placental development in the sheep and its relation to fetal development. A qualitative and quantitative anatomic and histologic study. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 44, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twardock, A. B., Symonds, H. W., Sansom, B. F. & Bowlands, G. J. (1973). The effect of litter size upon foetal growth rate and the placental transfer of calcium and phosphorus in superovulated Scottish half-bred ewes. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 437–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainman, F. W., Blaxter, K. L. & Pullar, J. D. (1970). The nutritive value for ruminants of a complete processed diet based on barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 311–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. B. (1948). The growth of lambs before and after birth in relation to the level of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 38 243–302; 367–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenham, G. & Bobinson, J. J. (1972). Badiographic pregnancy diagnosis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 233–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar