Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-bnl7t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T12:06:04.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tillering pattern in barley varieties: II. The effect of temperature, light intensity and daylength on the frequency of occurrence of the coleoptile node and second tillers in barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Q. Cannell
R. Q. Cannell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Controlled-environment experiments showed that development of the coleoptile node tiller (T1) was suppressed much more than that of the tiller appearing in the axil of the first true leaf (T2) by high temperature (24/15 °C; 19/10 °C; 10/6 °C), by reduced photoperiod (16 h; 12·5 h) or by low light intensity (1100 ft-c; 1000 ft-c), but minimally in the newest variety, Deba Abed. Unlike previous field experiments, the T1 tiller appeared on more Spratt Archer than Maris Badger plants. Maris Badger plants produced more T1 tillers in a high-low temperature regime (19/10 °C; 10/6 °C) than in continuous low temperature (10/6 °C). In a field experiment T1 tiller number (and yield), but not the number of other major shoots, were severely reduced by late sowing of Spratt Archer, progressively reduced in Maris Badger, but minimally in Deba Abed. This seemed to be associated with higher temperatures at later sowings.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , June 1969 , pp. 423 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aspinall, D. & Paleg, L. G. (1964). Effects of daylength and light intensity on growth of barley. III. Vegetative development. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 807–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, G. D. H. & Kirby, E. J. M. (1966). Utilization of growth responses in breeding new varieties of cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses, ed. Milthorpe, F. L. and Ivins, J. D.. Pp. 359. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Brenchley, W. E. (1923). Effect of weight of seed upon the resulting crop. Ann. appl. Biol. 10, 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. (1969). The tillering pattern in barley varieties. I. Production, survival and contribution to yield by component tillers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobben, W. H. Van (1962). Influence of temperature and light conditions on dry-matter distribution, development rate and yield in arable crops. Neth. J. agric. Sci. 10, 377–89.Google Scholar
Doodson, J. K., Manners, J. G. & Myers, A. (1964). The distribution pattern of carbon14 assimilated by the third leaf of wheat. J. exp. Bot. 15, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T., Wardlaw, I. F. & Williams, C. N. (1964). Environmental control of growth. In Grasses and Grasslands, ed. Barnard, C.. Pp. 269. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1965). Tillering and leaf production in wheat as affected by temperature and light intensity. Can. J. Bot. 43, 1063–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1966). The effects of light and temperature on the growth of cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses ed. Milthorpe, F. L. and Ivins, J. D.. Pp. 359. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C., Helson, V. A. & Fisher, J. E. (1962). The rate of dry weight accumulation in Marquis wheat as affected by temperature and light intensity. Can. J. Bot. 40, 939–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaastra, P. (1963). Climatic control of photosynthesis and respiration. In Environmental Control of Plant Growth, ed. Evans, L. T.. Pp. 449. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guitard, A. A. (1960). The influence of variety, temperature and stage of growth on the response of spring barley to photoperiod. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 40, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, H. H. (1948). A developmental study of the apical meristem in four varieties of Avena sativa grown at two temperatures. Amer. J. Bot. 35, 656–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, E. S. J. & Purvis, O. N. (1945). On the behavior in the field of small grain obtained by premature harvesting. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 35, 177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, L. P. V. & Taylor, A. R. (1958). Note on the effect of photoperiod and temperature on the development of spike primordia in barley. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 38, 122–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, M. L. & Mcfadden, A. D. (1960). The competitive interaction between barley plants grown from large and small seeds. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 40, 623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. & Eisenberg, B. E. (1966). Some effects of photoperiod on barley. J. exp. Bot. 17, 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer, R. H. M. (1963). Tillering in herbage grasses. Herb. Abstr. 33, 141–8.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. J. (1953). Influence of light and temperature on the growth of ryegrass (Lolium spp.). I. Pattern of vegetative development. Physiol. Plant. 6, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A. S. & Cooper, J. P. (1961). The influence of seasonal changes in light energy on leaf and tiller development in ryegrass, timothy and meadow fescue. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 16, 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. J. A. (1964). A comparison of leaf and tiller growth in seven perennial grasses as influenced by nitrogen and temperature. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 19, 281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharman, B. C. (1945). Leaf and bud initiation in the Gramineae. Bot. Gaz. 106, 269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. D. (1964). Assimilation and translocation in perennial grasses. Ann. Bot. 28, 419–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar