Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:17:06.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of chromic oxide as an indigestible marker for digestion studies in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. J. Faichney
G. J. Faichney
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Physiology, C.S.I.R.O., Ian Clunies Boss Animal Research Laboratory, Prospect, N.S.W.Australia*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Fistulated cross-bred sheep were given, by means of continuous feeders, concentrate diets containing chromic oxide (Cr2O3). Dry-matter digestibility coefficients predicted from the faecal concentration of Cr2O3 were compared with those obtained by total collection of faeces, and the concentration of Cr2O3 in spot samples of faeces taken at different times of day was compared with that in faeces bulked over an 8-day collection period. The rate of flow of digesta from the abomasum and the partition of digestion between the stomach and intestines, calculated from the concentration of Cr2O3 in samples of abomasal digesta, were compared with values obtained using two markers, one of which remained in solution while the other was adsorbed by particulate matter.

Récovery of Cr2O3 in the faeces ranged from 91 to 101% and predicted dry-matter digestibilities were similar to those obtained by total collection. There was no diurnal variation but there was marked random variation in the concentration of Cr2O3 in spot samples of faeces. Cr2O3 was shown to behave independently of the particulate matter in digesta and, as a single marker, it significantly underestimated the flow of digesta from the abomasum relative to the double marker method. Cr2O3 thus overestimated digestion in the stomach and underestimated digestion in the intestines. It was concluded that Cr2O3 was not a satisfactory marker for studies of the flow of digesta and hence the partition of digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract when digesta samples are taken from a simple cannula.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 493 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amos, H. E., Little, C. O., Ely, D. G. & Mitchell, G. E. Jr (1971). Abomasal protein and amino acids in steers fed different protein supplements. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 51, 51–6.Google Scholar
Bruce, J., Goodall, E. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). The flow of organic and inorganic materials through the alimentary tract of the sheep. Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 46–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. A 36, 328–30.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & MacDonald, A. P. (1958). Paper as a carrier of chromium sesquioxide. Nature, Lond. 182, 1014–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., McDonald, I. & Florence, E. (1960). Excretion of chromium sesquioxide administered as a component of paper to sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 14, 289–99.Google Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylene-diamine tetracetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. Br. J. Nutr. 18, 153–62.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. J., Holmes, J. H. G. & Garrett, W. N. (1970). A comparison of markers for estimating the magnitude of rumen digestion. Br. J. Nutr. 24, 961–70.Google Scholar
Elam, C. J., Putnam, P. A. & Davis, R. E. (1959). Faecal excretion pattern of chromic oxide administered to Hereford heifers in a completely pelleted ration. J. Anim. Sci. 18, 718–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1972). Digestion by sheep of concentrate diets containing formaldehyde-treated peanut meal. Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 859–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Davies, H. Lloyd (1972). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of peanut meal in concentrate diets on the performance of calves. Aust. J. agric. Res. 23, 167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. (1964). The digestion of food by the grazing sheep. 1. The rate of flow of digesta. Aust. J. agric. Res. 15, 384–96.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P & Phillipson, A. T. (1960). The rate of flow of digesta and their removal along the digestive tract of the sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 14, 147–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1967). The digestion of chopped and ground roughages by sheep. II. The digestion of nitrogen and some carbohydrate fraotions in the stomach and intestines. Aust. J. agric. Res. 18, 803–19.Google Scholar
Karr, M. R., Little, C. O. & Mitchell, G. E. Jr (1966). Starch disappearance from different segments of the digestive tract of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 652–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Florence, E. (1963 a). Estimation of faeces output of grazing animals from the concentration of chromium sesquioxide in a sample of faeces. 1. Comparison of estimates from samples taken at fixed times of day with faeces outputs measured directly. Br. J. Nutr. 17, 211–18.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P., Corbett, J. L., McDonald, I. & Florence, E. (1963 b). Estimation of faeces output of grazing animals from the concentration of chromium sesquioxide in a sample of faeces. 2. Comparison of estimates from samples taken at fixed times of day with estimates from samples collected from the sward. Br. J. Nutr. 17, 219–26.Google Scholar
Macrae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Studies on intestinal digestion in the sheep. 1. The use of chromic oxide as an indigestible marker. Br. J. Nutr. 23, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. L. (1972). The digestion of formaldehydetreated groundnut meal before and after the abomasum of lambs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 27 A.Google ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, J. W. G. & Sutton, J. D. (1969). The effect of diet composition and level of feeding on digestion in the stomach and intestines of sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 23, 585–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offer, N. W., Axford, R. F. E. & Evans, R. A. (1972). The recovery of markers in passage through the duodenum of the sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 39 A.Google ScholarPubMed
Offer, N. W., Evans, R. A. & Axford, R. F. E. (1972). The validity of marker practice for measiiring the flow of digesta in sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 31, 41 A.Google ScholarPubMed
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & McDonald, I. (1971 a). Digestion of concentrates in sheep. 1. The effect of increasing the concentration of soya-bean meal in a barley diet on apparent disappearance of feed constituents along the digestive tract. Br. J. Nutr. 25, 225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. & McDonald, I. (1971 b). Digestion of concentrates in sheep. 2. The effect of urea or fish-meal supplementation of barley diets on the apparent digestion of protein, fat, starch and ash in the rumen, the small intestine and the large intestine, and calculation of volatile fatty acid production. Br. J. Nutr. 25, 243–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. (1952). The passage of digesta from the abomasum of sheep. J. Physiol. 116, 84–97.Google Scholar
Pigden, W. J., Winter, K. A., Brisson, G. J. & Pritchard, G. I. (1964). Diurnal excretion of Cr2O3 by ruminants when administered in sustained-release pellets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 44, 207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edn.Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). Use of 103Ru-labelled tris (1,10-phenanthroline) Ruthenium (II) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. Int. J. appl. Rad. Isot. 22, 301–8.Google Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B. & Goodall, E. D. (1968). Digestion of concentrate and hay diets in the stomach and intestines of ruminants. 1. Sheep. Br. J. Nutr. 22, 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B., Goodall, E. D., Whitelaw, F. G. & Reid, R. S. (1968). Digestion of concentrate and hay diets in the stomach and intestines of ruminants. 2. Young steers Br. J. Nutr. 22, 281–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troelsen, J. E. (1965). Sustained release of chromic oxide in the rumen of sheep from a Cr2O3 paper pellet. Anim. Prod. 7, 239–45.Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E. (1966). Pelleting of chromic oxide for administration to cattle and sheep. Can. J. anim. Sci. 46, 226–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utley, P. R., Boling, J. A., Bradley, N. W. & Tucker, R. E. (1970). Recovery of radioactive chromic oxide from the bovine gastro-intestinal tract. J. Nutr. 100, 1227–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar