Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T00:10:01.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An attempt to improve the yield and quality of direct-drilled winter wheat grown continuously

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. R. Holbrook
Affiliation:
Northey Farm, Bozeat, Nr Wellingborough, Northanls
J. D. Osborne
Affiliation:
Northey Farm, Bozeat, Nr Wellingborough, Northanls
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Biology, Pembroke Street, Cambridge

Summary

Six field experiments on the effects of rate and time of application of nitrogen, three variety trials and one trial combining varieties with rates of application of nitrogen, all on winter wheat grown continuously and direct-drilled on a single farm, are described and the results discussed.

The experiments showed that worthwhile yield responses could be obtained to very high rates of N application and that percentage protein in the grain increased linearly with amount of N supplied even to the highest rate (350 kg N/ha) applied. The effects of time of application were variable but there was a suggestion that applying the nitrogen in two doses in the spring gave more yield than a single dose, in one experiment. Applying some N in the autumn gave no more yield than applying it all in the spring.

The variety trials gave results reasonably consistent with those of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany but the variety x nitrogen trial showed clear differences between varieties in response to nitrogen; the oldest variety, Maris Huntsman, showed a maximum at about 240 kg N/ha whereas none of the new varieties had reached their maximum by 270 kg N/ha.

It is argued that field trials devoted to improving crop yields for a particular farm are worthwhile if site x treatment interaction is large and season x treatment interaction is small.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association Or Official Analytical Chemists (1980). Official First Action 24.80.1, 2, 3.Google Scholar
Batey, T. (1976). Some effects of nitrogen fertilizers on winter wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 287297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, J. L. (1982). Variety x environment interactions in sugar beet variety trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 425435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, J. L., Jarvis, R. H. & Ridgman, W. J. (1965). Studies in the nitrogenous manuring of winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 65, 379387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. B., Vadyanathan, L. V., Rule, J. S. & Jarvis, R. H. (1979). Effect of sowing date and timing and level of nitrogen application to direct drilled winter wheat. Experimental Husbandry 35, 122131.Google Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H. & Seale, R. S. (1966). The soils of the district around Cambridge. Memorandum of the Soil Survey of Great Britain, pp. 5257.Google Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954). Growth stages in cereals. Illustration of the Feekes Scale. Plant Pathology 3, 128129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1973). Fertilizer Recommendations 1973, Bulletin 209, London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
National Institute Of Agricultural Botany (1974). Recommended varieties of cereals. Farmer's Leaflet No. 8.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. & Silvey, V. (1980). Statistics and recommended list trials of crop varieties in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1431, 219252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenvert, N. L. (1974). A simple measure of wheat hardness. Flour and Animal Feed Milling, 07 1974, p. 24.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Johnston, A. E. & Penny, A. (1980). Multifactorial experimentation on continuous winter wheat grown in sandy clay soil at Saxmundham, Suffolk. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 155170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar