Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T07:04:03.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. J. Parker ,
M. K. V. Carr ,
N. J. Jarvis ,
B. O. Puplampu  and
V. H. Lee
C. J. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, UK
M. K. V. Carr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, UK
N. J. Jarvis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, UK
B. O. Puplampu
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, UK
V. H. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Water Management, Silsoe College, Silsoe, Bedford MK45 4DT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The minirhizotron technique was evaluated for estimating root length density in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum ‘Record’) by comparing observations in angled 45° glass tubes with corresponding root length densities obtained by (a) destructive core sampling, and from (b) counts of root tips on the soil face of excavated trenches. Measurements were made in a field experiment in Bedfordshire, UK, in 1985, with shallow and deep cultivation as variables, and in a glasshouse trial.

Only at depths below 0·3 m did root lengths observed with minirhizotrons reflect at all closely those estimated from core sampling and even then there was a tendency to overestimate root density. In the surface cultivated layers, where 80–90% of the total root length was present, results from minirhizotrons were unreliable, probably because of poor soil–tube contact and, in soils which shrink on drying, preferential root growth at the interface between the soil and the glass.

Minirhizotrons can provide a realistic estimate of the rate of root growth of potatoes with depth over time when compared with maximum depths of water extraction, but appear to be unreliable for providing a quantitative measure of total root length density.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 116 , Issue 3 , June 1991 , pp. 341 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asfary, A. F., Wild, A. & Harris, P. M. (1983). Growth, mineral nutrition and water use by potato crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 87–101.Google Scholar
Böhm, W. (1979). Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Studies 33, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Bragg, P. L., Govi, G. & Cannell, R. Q. (1983). A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant and Soil 73, 435–440.Google Scholar
Durrant, M. J., Love, B. J. E., Messem, A. B. & Draycott, A. P. (1973). Growth of crop roots in relation to soil moisture extraction. Annals of Applied Biology 74, 387–394.Google Scholar
Glenn, D. M., Brown, M. W. & Takeda, E.. (1987). Statistical analysis of root count data from minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics (Ed. Taylor, H. M.), special publication No. 50, pp. 81–88. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Goss, M. J. (1986). How roots grow: a study in the field. Span 29, 50–52.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J. (1979). A periscope method for observing root growth and distribution in field soil. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 205–214.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J., McGowan, M., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1978). Water relations of winter wheat. I. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, R. J., Keller, J., Rasmussen, V. P. & Wilson, G. D. (1976). Line-source sprinkler design for continuous variable irrigation-crop production studies. Soil Science Society of America Journal 40, 426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. A. H., Burton, R. G. O., Corbett, W. M., Evans, R. & Seale, R. S. (1984). Soils and their use in eastern England. Bulletin No. 13. Soil Survey of England and Wales. Silsoe, Bedford, UK.Google Scholar
Huck, M. G. & Taylor, H. M. (1982). The rhizotron as a tool for root research. Advances in Agronomy 35, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulecho, I. K. (1985). The evaluation of a laboratory method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of light soils under different bulk densities. MSc thesis, Silsoe College, Cranfield Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lesczynski, D. B. & Tanner, C. B. (1976). Seasonal variation of root distribution of irrigated, field-grown Russet Burbank potato. American Potato Journal 53, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levan, M. A., Ycas, J. W. & Hummel, J. W. (1987). Light leak effects on near-surface soybean rooting observed with minirhizotrons. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics (Ed. Taylor, H. M.), special publication No. 50, pp. 67–80. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. D., Doering, E. J. & Reichman, G. A. (1987). Application of a minirhizotron with flexible pressurised walls to a study of corn root growth. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics (Ed. Taylor, H. M.), special publication No. 50, pp. 131–143. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. D. V. & Carr, M. K. V. (1988). Analysis of Experiments involving line source sprinkler irrigation. Experimental Agriculture 24, 169–176.Google Scholar
Parker, C. J., Carr, M. K. V., Jarvis, N. J., Evans, M. T. B. & Lee, V. H. (1989). Effects of subsoil loosening on soil physical properties, root distribution and water uptake of potatoes. Soil and Tillage Research 13, 167–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, C. M., Upchurch, D. R. & Gerik, T. J. (1984). Insitu observations of Phymatotrichum omnivorum with a borescope mini-rhizotron system. Phytopathology 74, 104–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smucker, A. J. M., McBurney, S. L. & Srivastava, A. K. (1982). Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydropneumatic elutriation system. Agronomy Journal 74, 500–503.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (Ed.) (1987). Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Special publication No. 50. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. & Böhm, W. (1976). Use of acrylic plastic as rhizotron windows. Agronomy Journal 68, 693–694.Google Scholar
Tennant, D. (1975). A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology 63, 955–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upchurch, D. R. (1987). Conversion of minirhizotron–root intersections to root length density. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics (Ed. Taylor, H. M.), special publication No. 50, pp. 51–66. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Upchurch, D. R. & Ritchie, J. T. (1983). Root observations using a vidco recording system in minirhizotrons. Agronomy Journal 75, 1009–1015.Google Scholar
Vos, J. & Groenwold, J. (1987). The relation between root growth along observation tubes and bulk soil. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes, Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics (Ed. Taylor, H. M.), special publication No. 50, pp. 39–50. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Warboys, I. B., Wilkes, J. M., Gooderham, P. T. & Wilkins, S. M. (1976). The development of a double digging machine. In The Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Soil Tillage Research Organisation No. 45, pp. 46.1–46.7.Google Scholar
Welbank, P. J., Gibb, M. J., Taylor, P. J. & Williams, E. D. (1974). Root growth of cereal crops. In Report of the Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973. part 2, pp. 26–76. Harpenden, UK.Google Scholar