Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Bayesian simultaneous equation models for the analysis of energy intake and partitioning in growing pigs

  • A. B. STRATHE (a1), H. JØRGENSEN (a2), E. KEBREAB (a1) and A. DANFÆR (a2)
Abstract
SUMMARY

The objective of the current study was to develop Bayesian simultaneous equation models for modelling energy intake and partitioning in growing pigs. A key feature of the Bayesian approach is that parameters are assigned prior distributions, which may reflect the current state of nature. In the models, rates of metabolizable energy (ME) intake, protein deposition (PD) and lipid deposition (LD) were treated as dependent variables accounting for residuals being correlated. Two complementary equation systems were used to model ME intake (MEI), PD and LD. Informative priors were developed, reflecting current knowledge about metabolic scaling and partial efficiencies of PD and LD rates, whereas flat non-informative priors were used for the reminder of the parameters. The experimental data analysed originate from a balance and respiration trial with 17 cross-bred pigs of three genders (barrows, boars and gilts) selected on the basis of similar birth weight. The pigs were fed four diets based on barley, wheat and soybean meal supplemented with crystalline amino acids to meet or exceed Danish nutrient requirement standards. Nutrient balances and gas exchanges were measured at c. 25, 75, 120 and 150 kg body weight (BW) using metabolic cages and open circuit respiration chambers. A total of 56 measurements were performed. The sensitivity analysis showed that only the maintenance component was sensitive to the prior specification, and hence the maintenance estimate of 0·91 MJ ME/kg0·60 per day (0·95 credible interval (CrI): 0·78–1·09) should be interpreted with caution. It was shown that boars’ ability to deposit protein was superior to that of barrows and gilts, as these had an estimated maximum PD (PDmax) of 250 g/day (0·95 CrI: 237–263), whereas the barrows and gilts had a PDmax of 210 g/day (0·95 CrI: 198–220). Furthermore, boars reached PDmax at 109 kg BW (0·95 CrI: 93·6–130), whereas barrows and gilts maximized PD at 81·7 kg BW (0·95 CrI: 75·6–89·5). At 25 kg BW, the boars partitioned on average 5–6% more of the ME above maintenance into PD than barrows and gilts, and this was progressively increased to 10–11% more than barrows and gilts at 150 kg BW. The Bayesian modelling framework can be used to further refine the analysis of data from metabolic studies in growing pigs.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Bayesian simultaneous equation models for the analysis of energy intake and partitioning in growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Bayesian simultaneous equation models for the analysis of energy intake and partitioning in growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Bayesian simultaneous equation models for the analysis of energy intake and partitioning in growing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: abstrathe@ucdavis.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Boisen & J. A. Fernandez (1997). Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Animal Feed Science and Technology 68, 277286.

R. J. Carroll , D. Ruppert , L. A. Stefanski & C. Crainiceanu (2006). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. 2nd edn. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 105. New York: Chapman & Hall.

A. Just (1982). The net energy value of balanced diets for growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 8, 541555.

A. Just , H. Jørgensen & J. A. Fernández (1983). Maintenance requirement and the net energy value of different diets for growth in pigs. Livestock Production Science 10, 487506.

D. J. Lunn , A. Thomas , N. Best & D. Spiegelhalter (2000). WinBUGS – a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 325337.

J. Noblet , C. Karege , S. Dubois & J. Van Milgen (1999). Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effects of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77, 12081216.

N. Quiniou , S. Dubois & J. Noblet (1995). Effect of dietary crude protein level on protein and energy balances in growing pigs: comparison of two measurement methods. Livestock Production Science 41, 5161.

D. J. Spiegelhalter , N. G. Best , B. P. Carlin & A. Van Der Linde (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of Royal Statistical Society: Series B 64, 583640.

A. B. Strathe , H. Sørensen & A. Danfær (2009). A new mathematical model for combining growth and energy intake in animals: the case of the growing pig. Journal of Theoretical Biology 261, 165175.

A. B. Strathe , A. Danfær , A. Chwalibog , H. Sørensen & E. Kebreab (2010 a). A multivariate nonlinear mixed effects method for analyzing energy partitioning in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 88, 23612372.

A. B. Strathe , J. Dijkstra , J. France , S. Lopez , T. Yan & E. Kebreab (2011). A Bayesian approach to analyze energy balance data from lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 25202531.

M. W. Tess , G. E. Dickerson , J. A. Nienaber , J. T. Yen & C. L. Ferrell (1984). Energy costs of protein and fat deposition in pigs fed ad libitum. Journal of Animal Science 58, 111122.

J. van Milgen & J. Noblet (1999). Energy partitioning in growing pigs: the use of a multivariate model as an alternative for the factorial analysis. Journal of Animal Science 77, 21542162.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 586 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.