Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Breeding for reduced methane emissions in extensive UK sheep systems

  • D. J. COTTLE (a1) and J. CONINGTON (a2)
Summary
SUMMARY

Selection index theory was used to model the effects of methane (CH4) production in the breeding objective on genetic responses in Scottish Blackface sheep in hill production systems in the UK. A range of economic values (EVs) were assumed for CH4 production calculated from possible carbon prices (£/t CO2 equivalent (CO2-e)). The implicit price of carbon required for maintenance of CH4 levels or to reduce CH4 production by 0·1 kg/head/yr in a hill flock was calculated. The predicted genetic changes in CH4 production from current selection programmes that have an implicit methane EV of zero were calculated. Correlations between production traits and CH4 production were sampled from assumed normal distributions, as these correlations are currently unknown. Methane emissions are likely to increase at a rate of c. 3 kg CO2-e/ewe/yr as a result of using current industry selection indices in hill sheep farming systems in the UK. Breeding objectives for more productive hill sheep include reducing lamb losses and rearing more, heavier lambs. By placing a cost on carbon emissions to halt the genetic increase in methane, heavy penalties will be incurred by farmers in terms of reduced productivity. This amounts to £6/ewe/yr or a 5% discounted loss of £2851 per 100 ewe flock over a 10-year selection horizon. If the correlations between production traits and CH4 are positive (as expected) then an implicit carbon price of c. £272/t CO2-e is required for no genetic increase in CH4 production if methane is not measured and c. £50/t CO2-e if methane could be measured. Achievement of government targets for the whole economy of a 20% reduction in greenhouse gases (GHGs) over a 30-year period would require carbon prices (/t CO2-e) of £1396 (indirect selection) or £296 (direct selection) for the sheep industry to achieve a 20% reduction entirely via a genetic change of c. –0·1 kg methane/head/yr. These carbon prices are placed in the context of possible government policies. A combination of genetic and non-genetic measures will probably be required for cost-effective reduction in methane production to meet government targets.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: dcottle@une.edu.au
References
Hide All
D. Alcock & R. S. Hegarty (2006). Effects of pasture improvement on productivity, gross margin and methane emissions of a grazing sheep enterprise. International Congress Series 1293, 103106.

G. E. P. Box & M. E. Muller (1958). A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 29, 610611.

J. Conington , S. C. Bishop , A. Waterhouse & G. Simm (2004). A bioeconomic approach to derive economic values for pasture-based sheep genetic improvement programs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 12901304.

D. J. Cottle , J. V. Nolan & S. G. Wiedemann (2011). Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Animal Production Science 51, 491514.

R. S. Hegarty , D. Alcock , D. L. Robinson , J. P. Goopy & P. E. Vercoe (2010). Nutritional and flock management options to reduce methane output and methane per unit product from sheep enterprises. Animal Production Science 50, 10261033.

N. R. Lambe , L. Bunger , S. C. Bishop , G. Simm & J. Conington (2008). The effects of selection indices for sustainable hill sheep production on carcass composition and muscularity of lambs, measured using X-ray computed tomography. Animal 2, 2735.

K. R. Lassey , M. J. Ulyatt , R. J. Martin , C. F. Walker & I. D. Shelton (1997). Methane emissions measured directly from grazing livestock in New Zealand. Atmospheric Environment 31, 29052914.

T. A. Mcallister , E. K. Okine , G. W. Mathison & K.-J. Cheng (1996). Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76, 231243.

H. M. Nielsen & P. R. Amer (2007). An approach to derive economic weights in breeding objectives using partial profile choice experiments. Animal 1, 12541262.

H. M. Nielsen , L. G. Christensen & A. F. Groen (2005). Derivation of sustainable breeding goals for dairy cattle using selection index theory. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 18821890.

H. M. Nielsen , L. G. Christensen & J. Ødegard (2006). A method to define breeding goals for sustainable dairy cattle production. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 36153625.

A. Pelchen & K. J. Peters (1998). Methane emissions from sheep. Small Ruminant Research 27, 137150.

G. M. Peters , H. V. Rowley , S. G. Wiedemann , R. W. Tucker , M. D. Short & M. S. Schulz (2010). Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environmental Science and Technology 44, 13271332.

M. J. Ulyatt , S. K. Baker , G. J. Mccrabb & K. R. Lassey (1999). Accuracy of the SF6 tracer technology and alternatives for field measurements. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 13291334.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 78 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.