Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T10:26:57.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative behaviour of seedlings of sorghum and some tropical legumes in relation to leaf expansion and growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. K. Chopra
Affiliation:
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
K. R. Koundal
Affiliation:
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India
Madhu Kansal
Affiliation:
Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India

Summary

Growth rates were compared of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), mung bean (Vigna radiata) and sorghum seedlings aged 2–5 weeks. The seedling growth rates were analysed in relation to leaf area development, net photosynthetic rate, nitrogen accumulation, nitrate reductase activity, and soluble protein content. Growth rates were highest in sorghum and lowest in C. cajan. Leaf area development was very fast in sorghum and very slow in C. cajan. Net photosynthetic rate of sorghum leaves was double that observed for the legume leaves. No significant difference was observed in nitrate reductase activity, nitrogen percentage or soluble protein content between sorghum and the legumes. In sorghum, early investment of assimilates into leaf development ensured a higher assimilation of carbon and nitrogen per plant. In the legumes, slow development of leaf area coupled with low photosynthetic rates probably resulted in slow growth of the seedlings. In the legume seedlings, vigour was related to the rates of leaf area expansion. Leaf area expansion rates were not related to the nitrogen status of the leaf in the species examined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeJono, T. M. & Phillips, D. A. (1981). Nitrogen stress and apparent photosynthesis in symbiotically grown Pieum sativum L. Plant Physiology 63, 309313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. C. (1972). The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1978). Crop Physiology, 335 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. (1979). Field studies of cereal leaf growth. I. Initiation and expansion in relation to temperature and ontogeny. Journal of Experimental Botany 80, 625636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. L. & Koller, H. R. (1977). Leaf area and CO2 exchange rate as determinants of the rate of vegetative growth in soybean plants. Crop Science 17, 3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. R. (1980). The growth rate of successive leaves of wheat plants in relation to sugar and protein concentrations in the extension zone. Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 13991412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. R. & Blacklow, W. M. (1980). Diurnal extension rates of wheat leaves in relation to temperatures and carbohydrate concentrations of the extension zone. Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 821828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klepper, L., Flesher, D. & Hageman, R. H. (1971). Generation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide for nitrate reduction in green leaves. Plant Physiology 48, 580590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorimer, G. H. (1981). The carboxylation and oxygenation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate. The primary events in photosynthesis and photorespiration. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 32, 349383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosenbough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novozamsky, I., Vaueck, J. R., Von Schduwenburg, J. CH. & Wallinga, J. (1974). Total nitrogen determination in plant materials by means of indophenol blue method. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. R. & Jones, J. W. (1977). Leaf area partitioning as an important factor in growth. Plant Physiology 59, 1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanthakumari, P. & Sinha, S. K. (1972). Variation in chlorophylls and photosynthetic rate in cultivars of Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Photosynthetica 6, 189194.Google Scholar
Shibles, R. M. & MacDonald, H. A. (1962). Photosynthetic area and rate in relation to seedling vigour of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Crop Science 2, 299302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K. (1977). FAO plant production and protection paper, Food legumes: distribution, adaptability and biology of yield. Paper No. 3. Rome: F.A.O.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K. & Khanna, R. (1975). Physiological, biochemical and genetic basis of heterosis. Advances in Agronomy 27, 123174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Khanna-Chopra, R., Chatterjee, S. P. & Abrol, Y. P. (1978). Composition of bleeding sap in Vigna aureus. Physiologia Plantarum 42, 4548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. F., DeJong, T. M. & Phillips, D. A. (1981). Carbon and nitrogen limitations on soybean seedlings development. Plant Physiology 68, 12061209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar