Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:19:11.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the effects of aqueous and of prilled urea, used alone or with urease or nitrification inhibitors, with those of ‘Nitro-Chalk’ on ryegrass leys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. A. Rodgers ,
F. V. Widdowson ,
A. Penny  and
M. V. Hewitt
G. A. Rodgers
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
F. V. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
M. V. Hewitt
Affiliation:
Soils and Plant Nutrition Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments on ryegrass leys at Rothamsted in 1981, 1982 and 1983 examined the eifects of injected aqueous urea and of broadcast prilled urea applied alone or with one of several nitrification or urease inhibitors, on yields and N, K, Ca and Mg uptakes. Aqueous urea, prilled urea or ‘Nitro-Chalk’ were applied as single 375 kg N/ha dressings, and prilled urea or ‘Nitro-Chalk’ as three 125 kg N/ha dressings. The nitrification inhibitors etridiazole or nitrapyrin were injected with aqueous urea, but dicyandiamide (DCD) was broadcast with prilled urea. Neither the urease inhibitor hydroquinone nor the nitrification inhibitors slowed the rate of urea hydrolysis. Neither hydroquinone nor DCD diminished volatilization losses of ammonia from broadcast urea which ranged from 8 to 25 kg N/ha; they were less than 4 kg N/ha from injected urea or broadcast ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Nitrapyrin, etridiazole and DCD effectively inhibited nitrification. DCD, and to a lesser extent hydroquinone, increased yields and nitrogen uptakes from a single broadcast application of prilled urea given either in winter or in spring. However, these yields were still smaller than those given by injected urea or by divided dressings of urea, whether or not an inhibitor was used. The inhibitors did not increase yields with divided broadcast dressings of urea, which were slightly smaller than those with equivalent dressings of ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Inhibitors did not consistently increase yield when injected with aqueous urea. Inhibitors applied with injected or broadcast urea slightly increased K uptakes, and slightly decreased Ca and Mg uptakes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 671 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amberger, A. & Vilsmeier, K. (1979). Versuche zur wirkung von cyanamid, dicyandiamid, guanylharnstoff, guanidin und nitrit auf die ureoseaktivitat. Landwirtschaftliche Forschung 32, 409–415.Google Scholar
American Society of Agronomy (1980). Nitrification nhibitors – Potentials and Limitations. Special publication No. 38 (ed. Stelly, M.). Madison, Wisconsin: ASA.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982). World Markets. Nitrogen 140, 10–11.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J., Briggs, G. G., Evans, A. A. & Matula, J. (1977). The inhibition of nitrification by nitrapyrin, carbon disulphide and trithiocarbonate. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 673–683.Google Scholar
Ashworth, J., Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A., Gibbs, A. J., Hodgkinson, R. A. & Hewitt, M. V. (1982). Results from an experiment on permanent grass evaluating the cumulative effects of aqueous urea, injected alone or with a nitrification inhibitor, with those o ‘Nitro-Chalk’. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, F. E., Hill, G. N. & Tyler, K. B. (1958). Transformations and movement of urea in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 22, 303–307.Google Scholar
Bundy, L. G. & Bremner, J. M. (1973). Effects of substituted p-benzoquinones on urease activity in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 5, 847–853.Google Scholar
Bundy, L. G. & Bremner, J. M. (1974a). Effects of urease inhibitors on nitrification in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 6, 27–30.Google Scholar
Bundy, L. G. & Bremner, J. M. (1974b). Effects of nitrification inhibitors on transformations of urea nitrogen in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 6, 369–376.Google Scholar
Chin, W. T. & Kroontje, W. (1962). Mechanisms of urea adsorption by soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 26, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, B. M. (1983). Use of fertilizers in England and Wales, 1982. Bothamsted Experimental Station, Beport for 1982, Part 2, 161–168.Google Scholar
Cornforth, I. S. & Chesney, H. A. D. (1971). Nitrification inhibitors and ammonia volatilization. Plant and Soil 34, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, J. W. & Massey, H. F. (1960). The effects of several factors on volatilisation of ammonia formed from urea in the soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 24, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, L. B., Matocha, J. E. & Wu, E. (1982). Substitution of ammonium and potassium for added calcium in reduction of ammonia loss from surfaceapplied urea. Soil Science Society of America Journal 46, 771–776.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. (1964). Urea as a fertilizer. Soils and Fertilizers 27, 175–180.Google Scholar
Goring, C. A. I. (1962). Control of nitrification by 2-chloro-6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine. Soil Science 93, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, P. (1975). Effects of added salts on nitrogen release and nitrate levels in forest soils of the Washington coastal area. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 39, 778–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, L. L. & Keeney, D. R. (1979). Effect of some physical and chemical factors on the rate of hydrolysis of nitrapyrin (N-serve). Soil Biology and Biochemistry 11, 47–50.Google Scholar
Jansson, S. L., Hallam, M. J. & Bartholomew, W. V. (1955). Preferential utilization of ammonium over nitrate by micro-organisms in the decomposition of oat straw. Plant and Soil 6, 382–390.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D. & Guenzi, W. D. (1963). Influence of salts on ammonium oxidation and carbon dioxide evolution from soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 27, 663–666.Google Scholar
Knop, K. (1982). Gaseous nitrogen losses in fertilizers in the form of ammonia. Rostlinńa Výroba 28, 935–946.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Automated and manual direct determination of blood urea. Clinical Chemistry 11, 624–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, V. G. & Debell, D. S. (1980). Comparison of four methods of measuring volatilization losses of nitrogen following urea fertilization of forest soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 60, 549–563.Google Scholar
Mathers, A. C., Stewart, B. A. & Grunes, D. L. (1982). Effect of a nitrification inhibitor on the K, Ca and Mg composition of winter wheat forage. Agronomy Journal 74, 569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). Lime and fertilizer recommendations. Booklet 2191.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. & Bremner, J. M. (1970). Gaseous products of nitrite decomposition in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2, 203–215.Google Scholar
Overrein, L. N. & Moe, P. G. (1967). Factors affecting urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization in soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 31, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, A., Widdowson, F. V. & Ashworth, J. (1977). Results from an experiment on permanent grass evaluating aqueous ammonia and aqueous urea, injected in bands either 30 or 60 cm apart. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quastel, J. H. (1933). The action of polyhydric phenols on urease. Biochemical Journal 27, 1116–1122.Google Scholar
Reddy, G. R. (1964). Effect of mixing varying quantities of dicyandiamide with ammonium fertilizer on nitrification of ammonia in soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 44, 254–259.Google Scholar
Rodgers, G. A. (1983). Effect of dicyandiamide on ammonia volatilisation from urea in soil. Fertilizer Research 4, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodoers, G. A., Widdowson, F. V., Penny, A. & Hewitt, M. V. (1983). Effects of several nitrification inhibitors, when injected with aqueous urea, on yields and nitrogen recoveries of ryegrass leys. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 637–656.Google Scholar
Ryden, J. C. (1983). Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate. Journal of Soil Science 34, 355–365.Google Scholar
Sommer, K. (1972). Nitrificides. Part 1. Action, significance and procedure for selection of nitrificidal compounds. Landwirtschaftliche Forschung Sonderheft 27, 64–73.Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1961). Gaseous loss of ammonia from surface-applied nitrogenous fertilisers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 9, 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar