Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 521
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ajigboye, Olubukola O. Bousquet, Louise Murchie, Erik H. and Ray, Rumiana V. 2016. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters allow the rapid detection and differentiation of plant responses in three different wheat pathosystems. Functional Plant Biology, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 356.

    Allinne, C. Savary, S. and Avelino, J. 2016. Delicate balance between pest and disease injuries, yield performance, and other ecosystem services in the complex coffee-based systems of Costa Rica. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 222, p. 1.

    Andrew, Izzadora K.S. and Storkey, Jonathan 2016. Using simulation models to investigate the cumulative effects of sowing rate, sowing date and cultivar choice on weed competition. Crop Protection,

    Anten, Niels P.R. and Vermeulen, Peter J. 2016. Tragedies and Crops: Understanding Natural Selection To Improve Cropping Systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 31, Issue. 6, p. 429.

    Barnes, Andrew P. 2016. Can’t get there from here: attainable distance, sustainable intensification and full-scale technical potential. Regional Environmental Change,

    Basler, Ryan 2016. Diversity ofFusariumspecies isolated from UK forage maize and the population structure ofF. graminearumfrom maize and wheat. PeerJ, Vol. 4, p. e2143.

    Ben-Ari, Tamara Adrian, Juliette Klein, Tommy Calanca, Pierluigi Van der Velde, Marijn and Makowski, David 2016. Identifying indicators for extreme wheat and maize yield losses. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 220, p. 130.

    Benaragama, D Shirtliffe, S J Johnson, E N Duddu, H S N Syrovy, L D and Albrecht, Harald 2016. Does yield loss due to weed competition differ between organic and conventional cropping systems?. Weed Research, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 274.

    Bendis, Randall J. and Relyea, Rick A. 2016. If you see one, have you seen them all?: Community-wide effects of insecticide cross-resistance in zooplankton populations near and far from agriculture. Environmental Pollution, Vol. 215, p. 234.

    Bheema Lingeswara Reddy, I. N. Chandrasekhar, K. Zewdu, Y. Dinoor, A. Keller, B. and Ben-David, R. 2016. Identification and genetic mapping of PmAF7DS a powdery mildew resistance gene in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 129, Issue. 6, p. 1127.

    Birkhofer, Klaus Smith, Henrik G and Rundlöf, Maj 2016. eLS.

    Birkhofer, K. Arvidsson, F. Ehlers, D. Mader, V. L. Bengtsson, J. and Smith, H. G. 2016. Organic farming affects the biological control of hemipteran pests and yields in spring barley independent of landscape complexity. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 567.

    Bonneau, Mathieu Peyrard, Nathalie Gaba, Sabrina and Sabbadin, Régis 2016. Sampling for weed spatial distribution mapping need not be adaptive. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 233.

    Buffon, Giseli Blasi, Édina A. R. Adamski, Janete M. Ferla, Noeli J. Berger, Markus Santi, Lucélia Lavallée-Adam, Mathieu Yates, John R. Beys-da-Silva, Walter O. and Sperotto, Raul A. 2016. Physiological and Molecular Alterations Promoted bySchizotetranychus oryzaeMite Infestation in Rice Leaves. Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 431.

    Burkitbayeva, Saule Qaim, Matin and Swinnen, Johan 2016. A Black (White) Hole in the Global Spread of GM Cotton. Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 260.

    Busi, Roberto and Powles, Stephen B 2016. Cross-resistance to prosulfocarb +S-metolachlor and pyroxasulfone selected by either herbicide inLolium rigidum. Pest Management Science, Vol. 72, Issue. 9, p. 1664.

    Cabrera, Alegría Celis, Rafael and Hermosín, Mari Carmen 2016. Imazamox-clay complexes with chitosan- and iron(III)-modified smectites and their use in nanoformulations. Pest Management Science, Vol. 72, Issue. 7, p. 1285.

    Chen, Ray Zhuangrui and Wong, Ming-Hung 2016. Integrated wetlands for food production. Environmental Research, Vol. 148, p. 429.

    Choi, Geun Hyoung Kim, Leesun Lee, Deuk Yeong Jin, Cho long Lim, Sung-Jin Park, Byung Jun Cho, Nam-Jun and Kim, Jin-Hyo 2016. Quantitative analyses of ricinoleic acid and ricinine inRicinus communisextracts and its biopesticides. Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 165.

    Chuche, Julien Auricau-Bouvery, Nathalie Danet, Jean-Luc and Thiéry, Denis 2016. Use the insiders: could insect facultative symbionts control vector-borne plant diseases?. Journal of Pest Science,


Crop losses to pests

  • E.-C. OERKE (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 09 December 2005

Productivity of crops grown for human consumption is at risk due to the incidence of pests, especially weeds, pathogens and animal pests. Crop losses due to these harmful organisms can be substantial and may be prevented, or reduced, by crop protection measures. An overview is given on different types of crop losses as well as on various methods of pest control developed during the last century.

Estimates on potential and actual losses despite the current crop protection practices are given for wheat, rice, maize, potatoes, soybeans, and cotton for the period 2001–03 on a regional basis (19 regions) as well as for the global total. Among crops, the total global potential loss due to pests varied from about 50% in wheat to more than 80% in cotton production. The responses are estimated as losses of 26–29% for soybean, wheat and cotton, and 31, 37 and 40% for maize, rice and potatoes, respectively. Overall, weeds produced the highest potential loss (34%), with animal pests and pathogens being less important (losses of 18 and 16%). The efficacy of crop protection was higher in cash crops than in food crops. Weed control can be managed mechanically or chemically, therefore worldwide efficacy was considerably higher than for the control of animal pests or diseases, which rely heavily on synthetic chemicals. Regional differences in efficacy are outlined. Despite a clear increase in pesticide use, crop losses have not significantly decreased during the last 40 years. However, pesticide use has enabled farmers to modify production systems and to increase crop productivity without sustaining the higher losses likely to occur from an increased susceptibility to the damaging effect of pests.

The concept of integrated pest/crop management includes a threshold concept for the application of pest control measures and reduction in the amount/frequency of pesticides applied to an economically and ecologically acceptable level. Often minor crop losses are economically acceptable; however, an increase in crop productivity without adequate crop protection does not make sense, because an increase in attainable yields is often associated with an increased vulnerability to damage inflicted by pests.

Corresponding author
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *