Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Dietary options to reduce the environmental impact of milk production

  • J. M. WILKINSON (a1) and P. C. GARNSWORTHY (a1)

Summary

A range of options was explored to test the hypothesis that diets for dairy cows could be formulated to reduce the carbon footprint (CFP) of feed, increase efficiency of conversion of potentially human-edible feed into milk, increase nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and reduce methane (CH4) emissions per kg milk. Diets based on grazed grass, grass silage, maize silage or straw, supplemented with raw material feeds, were formulated to meet requirements for metabolizable energy and metabolizable protein for a range of daily milk yields. At similar levels of milk yield, NUE, predicted CH4 emissions and diet CFP were generally higher for diets based on maize silage than for those based on grazed grass, grass silage or straw. Predicted CH4 emissions and human-edible proportion decreased, while NUE increased with the increasing level of milk yield. It is concluded that there is potential to reduce the environmental impact of milk production by altering diet formulation, but the extent to which this might occur is likely to depend on availability of raw material feeds with low CFPs.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: Phil.Garnsworthy@nottingham.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Anonymous (2015). Directive 2010/75/EU integrated pollution prevention and control. Official Journal of the European Union L334, 17119. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010L0075&qid=1431954176151&from=EN (verified 18 May 2015).
Bell, M. J., Potterton, S. L., Craigon, J., Saunders, N., Wilcox, R. H., Hunter, M., Goodman, J. R. & Garnsworthy, P. C. (2014). Variation in enteric methane emissions among cows on commercial dairy farms. Animal 8, 15401546.
Blaxter, K. L. & Czerkawski, J. (1966). Modifications of the methane production of the sheep by supplementation of its diet. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 17, 417421.
Bodas, R., Lopez, S., Fernandez, M., Garcia-Gonzales, R., Rodriguez, A. B., Wallace, R. J. & Gonzales, J. S. (2008). In vitro screening of the potential of numerous plant species as antimethanogenic feed additives for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 245258.
Broderick, G. A. (2003). Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 13701381.
Colman, D. R., Beever, D. E., Jolly, R. W. & Drackley, J. K. (2011). Gaining from technology for improved dairy cow nutrition: economic, environmental, and animal health benefits. The Professional Animal Scientist 27, 505517.
Council For Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) (1999). Animal Agriculture and Global Food Supply. Task Force Report No. 135. Ames, IA, USA: CAST.
DairyCo (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions on British Dairy Farms. DairyCo Carbon Footprinting Study: Year One. Kenilworth, UK: DairyCo. Available from: http://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/media/623464/greenhouse_gas_emissions_on_british_dairy_farms.pdf (verified 3 September 2016).
Department For Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, DEFRA (2014). Agricultural Statistics and Climate Change, 5th ed. London: DEFRA. Available from: http://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/agricultural-statistics-and-climate-change (verified 4 June 2015).
De Klein, C., Novoa, R. S. A., Ogle, S., Smith, K. A., Rochette, P. & Wirth, T. C. (2006). N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Eds Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K.), pp. 11·111·54. Hyama, Kanagawa, Japan: IPCC. Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_11_Ch11_N2O&CO2.pdf (verified 3 June 2015).
Dewhurst, R. (2006). Manipulating cow diets to reduce nutrient waste to the environment. In Proceedings of the South Island Dairy Event. Christchurch, NZ: SIDE. Available from: http://side.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/4.4-Manipulating-cow-diets-to-reduce-nutrient-wastage-to-the-environment.doc (verified 28 May 2014).
Dong, H., Mangino, J., McAllister, T. A., Hatfield, J. L., Johnson, D. E., Lassey, K. R., de Lima, M. A. & Romanovskaya, A. (2006). Emissions from livestock and manure management. In 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Volume 4. Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (Eds Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K.), pp. 10·110·87. Hyama, Kanagawa, Japan: IPCC. Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html (verified 18 November 2015).
Ertl, P., Klocker, H., Hörtenhuber, S., Knaus, W. & Zollitsch, W. (2015). The net contribution of dairy production to human food supply: the case of Austrian dairy farms. Agricultural Systems 137, 119125.
EUROSTAT (2013). Agri-Environmental Indicator - Ammonia Emissions. Luxembourg: EUROSTAT. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agri-environmental_indicator_-_ammonia_emissions (verified 28 May 2014).
FAO, IDF & IFCN (2014). World Mapping of Animal Feeding Systems in the Dairy Sector. Rome: FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3913e.pdf (verified 14 August 2014).
Garnsworthy, P. C., Craigon, J., Hernandez-Medrano, J. H. & Saunders, N. (2012 a). On-farm methane measurements during milking correlate with total methane production by individual dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 31663180.
Garnsworthy, P. C., Craigon, J., Hernandez-Medrano, J. H. & Saunders, N. (2012 b). Variation among individual dairy cows in methane measurements made on farm during milking. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 31813189.
Gerber, P., Vellinga, T., Opio, C., Henderson, B. & Steinfeld, H. (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector. A Life Cycle Assessment. Rome: FAO.
Gibbs, M. J., Conneely, D., Johnson, D., Lasse, K. R. & Ulyatt, M. J. (2002). CH4 Emissions from enteric fermentation. In IPCC, Background Papers: IPCC Expert Meetings on Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (Ed. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Technical Support Unit), pp. 297320. Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan: IPCC. Available from: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/bgp/4_1_CH4_Enteric_Fermentation.pdf (verified 18 November 2015).
Grenet, E. (1983). Utilization of grass-silage nitrogen by growing sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 4362.
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Lee, C., Meinen, R., Montes, F., Ott, T., Firkins, J., Rotz, A., Dell, C., Adesogan, A., Yang, W., Tricarico, J., Kebreab, E., Waghorn, G., Dijsktra, J. & Oosting, S. (2013). Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Livestock Production – A Review of Technical Options for Non-CO2 Emissions. FAO Animal Production and Health paper 177. Rome: FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/87178c51-d4d1-515d-9d0e-b5a6937fa631/ (verified 26 July 2016).
Kasuya, H. & Takahashi, J. (2010). Methane emissions from dry cows fed grass or legume silages. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23, 563566.
Ledgard, S., Schils, R., Erikson, J. & Luo, J. (2009). Environmental impacts of grazed clover/grass pastures. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 48, 209226.
Lehuger, S., Gabrielle, B. & Gagnaire, N. (2009). Environmental impact of the substitution of soybean meal with locally-produced rapeseed meal in dairy cow feed. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 616624.
Miller, L. A., Moorby, J. M., Davies, D. R., Humphreys, M. O., Scollan, N. D., MacRae, J. C. & Theodorou, M. K. (2001). Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 56, 383394.
O'Brien, D., Capper, J. L., Garnsworthy, P. C., Grainger, C. & Shalloo, L. (2014). A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 18351851.
Office Of Public Sector Information (2014). Climate Change Act 2008. Chapter 27. London: HMSO. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents (verified 15 August 2014).
Olesen, J. E., Schelde, K., Weiske, A., Weisbjerg, M. R., Asman, W. A. H. & Djurhuus, J. (2006). Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112, 207220.
Opio, C., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B. & Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ruminant Supply Chains – A global Life Cycle Assessment. Rome: FAO.
Premier Nutrition (2014). Premier Atlas 2014 Ingredients Matrix . Rugeley, UK: Premier Nutrition. Available from: http://www.premiernutrition.co.uk/default.aspx?SectionID=UK_TecAt (verified 3 September 2016).
Reynolds, C. K., Crompton, L. A., Mills, J. A. N., Humphries, D. J., Kirton, P., Relling, A. E., Misselbrook, T. H., Chadwick, D. R. & Givens, D. I. (2010). Effects of diet protein level and forage source on energy and nitrogen balance and methane and nitrogen excretion in lactating dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Energy and Protein Metabolism (Ed. Corvetto, G. M.), pp. 463464. EAAP Publication No. 127. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Roberts, D. J. & March, M. (2013). Feeding systems for dairy cows: Homegrown versus co-product feeds. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition 2013 (Eds Garnsworthy, P. C. & Wiseman, J.), pp. 6169. Packington, UK: Context Products Ltd.
Rotz, C. A. (2004). Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production. Journal of Animal Science 82(E. Suppl.), E119E137.
Sinclair, K. D., Garnsworthy, P. C., Mann, G. E. & Sinclair, L. A. (2014). Reducing dietary protein in dairy cow diets: implications for nitrogen utilization, milk production, welfare and fertility. Animal 8, 262274.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. & De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Rome: FAO.
Tamminga, S., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J. & Zom, R. (2007). Feeding Strategies to Reduce Methane Loss in Cattle. Report 34, Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen UR.
Thomas, C. (Ed.) (2004). Feed into Milk: A New Applied Feeding System for Dairy Cows. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.
US Environmental Protection Agency (2012). National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, Compiled CAFO Final Rule Part 122 – EPA Administered Permit Programs: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. Washington, DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/cafo_final_rule2008_comp.pdf (verified 3 September 2016).
Vellinga, T. V. & Hoving, I. E. (2011). Maize silage for dairy cows: mitigation of methane emissions can be offset by land use change. Nutrient Cycling in Ecosystems 89, 413426.
Vellinga, T. V., Blonk, H., Marinussen, M., Van Zeist, W. J. & Starmans, D. A. J. (2012). Methodology used in Feedprint: a Tool Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Feed Production and Utilization. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Wageningen UR Livestock Research.
Waghorn, G. C., Tavendale, M. H. & Woodfield, D. R. (2002). Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64, 167171.
Weiske, A. & Michel, J. (2007). Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Costs of Selected Mitigation Measures in Agricultural Production. MEACAP WP3 D15a. Sixth Framework Programme Priority 8: Policy-Oriented Research. Specific Targeted Research Project n°SSPE-CT-2004-503604: Impact of Environmental Agreements on the CAP. London, UK: Institute for European Environmental Policy. Available from: http://www.ieep.eu/assets/613/WP3_D15_ghg_mitigation_costs.pdf (verified 3 September 2016).
White, R. R. & Capper, J. L. (2014). Precision diet formulation to improve performance and profitability across various climates: modeling the implications of increasing the formulation frequency of dairy cattle diets. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 15631577.
Wilkinson, J. M. (2011). Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal 5, 10141022.
Wilkinson, J. M. (2013). A review of changes in the use of raw materials in the manufacture of animal feeds in Great Britain from 1976 to 2011. World Agriculture 4, 1017.
Wilkinson, J. M. & Audsley, E. (2013). Options from life-cycle analysis for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from crop and livestock production systems. International Journal of Agricultural Management 2, 7080.
Wilkinson, J. M., Allen, J. D., Tunnicliffe, R., Smith, M. & Garnsworthy, P. C. (2014). Variation in composition of pre-grazed pasture herbage in the United Kingdom 2006–2012. Animal Feed Science and Technology 196, 139144.
Williams, A. G., Audsley, E. & Sandars, D. L. (2006). Determining the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205. Bedford, UK: Cranfield University. Available from: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=IS0205_3959_FRP.doc (verified 26 July 2016).
Yates, C. M., Cammell, S. B., France, J. & Beever, D. E. (2000). Prediction of methane emissions from dairy cows using multiple regression analysis. In Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 2000, p. 94 (abstract). Penicuik, UK: British Society of Animal Science.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed