Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T23:22:24.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A dynamic model for the effects of soil and weather conditions on nitrogen response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. Greenwood
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
J. T. Wood
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick
T. J. Cleaver
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwick

Summary

A dynamic model was derived to predict crop response to nitrogen fertilizer under different soil and weather conditions. It combined formulae representing existing principles about important processes such as leaching of nitrate through soil and nitrate uptake by plant roots. Starting values were given for the initial plant weight and its nitrogen content and parameters were included for the crop's growth and rooting characteristics under optimum growing conditions. For each day the model re-calculated the distribution of water, nitrate and roots down the soil profile and the increment of growth.

The validity of the model was tested by using it to forecast the effects of different weather conditions and cultural practices on the nitrogen responses of a test crop, lettuce, when grown in experiments that were entirely independent of those used to obtain parameter values for the model. It successfully predicted the effects on the general shape of the response curve of the distribution of rainfall during the growing season, the age of the plant, the depth of fertilizer incorporation and the application of the nitrogen partly as a top dressing instead of entirely as a base dressing.

The model was used to develop a strategy for nitrogen fertilizer practice for lettuce in the U.K. which was found to be broadly in agreement with the results of fertilizer experiments on grower's holdings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberda, T. L. (1968). Some aspects of nitrogen in plants more especially in grass. Stickstof 12, 97103.Google Scholar
Allison, L. E. (1964). Salinity in relation to irrigation. Advances in Agronomy 16, 139–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B., Nelder, J. A. & Berry, G. (1964). The use of a mathematical model for the analysis of manurial and weather effects on the growth of carrots. Annals of Botany 28, 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, J. P., Nye, P. H. & Tinker, P. B. (1973). Uptake of solutes by multiple root systems from soil. III. A model for calculating the solute uptake by a randomly dispersed root system developing in a finite volume of soil. Plant and Soil 38, 621635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, W. V. (1971). 15N in research on the availability and crop use of nitrogen. In Nitrogen-15 in Soil-plant Studies, pp. 120. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Authority.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. A. & Dermott, W. (1964). Fertilizer experiments on maincrop potatoes, 1955–61. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 63, 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, I. G. (1974). A model for predicting the redistribution of salts in fallow soils after excess rainfall or evaporation. Journal of Soil Science (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A. L. & Barley, K. P. (1968). The uptake of nitrogen from soils in relation to solute diffusion. Australian Journal of Soil Research 6, 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. (1972). Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and perspectives. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1964). Relation of root distribution to water uptake and availability. Agronomy Journal 56, 41–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerwitz, A. (1972). Root studies. Report of National Vegetable Research Station for 1971, p. 36.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. & Greenwood, D. J. (1973). Distribution of nutrients in a cropped soil. Report of National Vegetable Research Station for 1972, p. 48.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Cleaver, T. J. & Niendorf, K. B. (1974). Effects of weather conditions on the response of lettuce to applied fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Wood, J. T., Cleaver, T. J. & Hunt, J. (1971). A theory for fertilizer response. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 511–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundegärdh, H. (1951). Leaf Analysis (translated by Mitchell, R. L.), p. 52. London: Hilger and Watts.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L., Szeicz, G. & Yabuki, K. (1964). Crop photosynthesis and the flux of carbon dioxide below the canopy. Journal of Applied Ecology 1, 321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paauw, F. van der (1962). Effect of winter rainfall in the amount of nitrogen available to crops. Plant and Soil 16, 361–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, D. L., Martin, M. W. & Nye, P. H. (1967). The measurement and mechanism of ion diffusion in soils. III. The effect of moisture content and soil solution concentration on the self diffusion of ions in soils. Journal of Soil Science 18, 204–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H. R. (1974). The effect of irrigation on the length, weight and diameter of lettuce roots. Plant and Soil (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaife, M. A., Webber, J. & Jones, D. (1972). Fertilizer experiments with outdoor lettuce. Journal of Horticultural Science 47, 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarsbrook, C. E. (1965). Nitrogen availability. In Soil Nitrogen, Agronomy No. 10, pp. 481502. Madison: American Society for Agronomy.Google Scholar
Slatyer, R. O. (1967). Plant-water relationships, pp. 301–3. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Terkeltoub, R. W. & Babcock, K. L. (1971). A simple method for predicting salt movement through soil. Soil Science 111, 182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viets, F. G. (1965). The plants' need for and use of nitrogen. In Soil Nitrogen, Agronomy No.10, pp. 503–49. Madison: American Society for Agronomy.Google Scholar
Yates, F. (1969). Investigations into the effects of weather on yield. Report of Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1968, part 2, pp. 4649.Google Scholar