Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T19:09:31.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early reproductive failure of ewes in a hot environment I. Ovulation rate and embryonic mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Margaret Ryle
Margaret Ryle
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Twenty-four Merino ewes acclimatized to a hot environment were compared with twenty-four kept at normal temperatures, with respect to ovulation rate and embryonic loss by 25 days' pregnancy. Possible modifying effects of the three subsidiary factors, thyroxine level, vitamin A intake and progesterone level, were sought. The design of the experiment was a balanced factorial one.

2. While the differences between the hot-room and yard groups as a whole were not significant, in the former there were fewer ovulations, a smaller proportion of the potential embryos actually began to develop and, of these, a larger proportion had died by 25 days' pregnancy. Consequently only thirteen hot-room ewes contained live embryos compared to twenty in the yard; the total numbers of live embryos were fourteen and twenty-seven, respectively.

3. Of the subsidiary factors only thyroxine produced any marked effect. Both in the hot-room and in the yard the proportion of potential embryos developing and the proportion of actual embryos surviving at 25 days' pregnancy were greater where thyroxine injections were given. There appeared, however, to be no effect on ovulation rate. There was a significant increase in the proportion of hot-room ewes with live embryos due to thyroxine. Grouping hot-room and yard ewes together, thyroxine injections were associated with a significant increase in the proportion of potential embryos developing and in the proportion of actual embryos surviving; also, consequently, in the proportion of ewes with live embryos.

4. The results are discussed in relation to published work on the effects of high temperatures on reproduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , August 1961 , pp. 1 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alliston, C. W. & Ulberg, L. C. (1957). Proc. Ass. Sth. Agric. Wkrs, 54, 89. (Quoted by Ulberg, 1958, J. Hered. 49, 62.)Google Scholar
Berliner, V. & Warbritton, V. (1937). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. p. 137.Google Scholar
Bogart, R. & Mayer, D. T. (1946). Amer. J. Physiol. 147, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. L. (1956). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1, 47.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H., Ellington, E. F. & Carlton, W. W. (1956). J. Anim. Sci. 15, 1287.Google Scholar
Dutt, R. H., Ellington, E. F. & Carlton, W. W. (1959). J. Anim. Sci. 18, 1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, R. J. W. & Ryley, J. W. (1956). Qld. J. Agric. Sci. 13, 1.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1956). Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 16, 101.Google Scholar
Hart, D. S. (1960). N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 3, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henneman, H. A., Reineke, E. P. & Griffin, S. A. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laschet, U., Hohlweg, W. & Wiese, W. (1959). Int. Z. Vitaminforsch. 30, 77.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Morris, R. J. H. & Howard, B. (1958). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Pennycuik, P. R. & Thrift, E. (1957). J. Physiol. 135, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, W. V., Pennycuik, P. R., Yeates, N. T. M. & Thrift, E. (1959). Proc. of Conf. on Recent Progress in Endocrin. of Reproduction, p. 81. Syracuse U.S.A.Google Scholar
Mooke, N. W. & Rowson, L. E. A. (1959). Nature, Lond., 184, 1410.Google Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. (1954). Aust. Vet. J. 30, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moule, G. R. (1950). Aust. Vet. J. 26, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moule, G. R. (1956). Aust. Vet. J. 32, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, A. W. (1945). Aust. J. Exp. Biol. med. Sci. 23, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, J. and Maré, G. (1931). 17th Report of the Div. of Vet. Services and Animal Industry, p. 663. Union of South Africa.Google Scholar
Riek, R. F., Hardy, M. H., Lee, D. H. K. & Carter, H. B. (1950). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K. & Lee, D. H. K. (1947). J. Anim. Sci. 6, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronning, M. & Knodt, C. B. (1952). J. Dairy Sci. 35, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, M. (1960). Aust. J. Sci. 23, 36.Google Scholar
Ryle, M. & Morris, L. R. (1961). Aust. J. Exp. Biol. med. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
Shah, M. K. (1956). Nature, Lond., 177, 1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, E. (1953). B.Sc. (Med.) Thesis, Univ. of Queensland.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. A. (1950). Amer. J. Anat. 87, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1953). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1956). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 7, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar