Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:48:24.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of particle size on digestion of hay by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Fadlalla ,
R. N. B. Kay  and
E. D. Goodall
B. Fadlalla
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
R. N. B. Kay
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
E. D. Goodall
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The digestion and retention times of milled hay diets were first studied in three sheep fitted with rumen and abomasal cannulae. The hay was milled through 5, 20 or 40 mm screens. Solubility of dry matter (D.M.) in water and rate of loss of D.M. from hay in nylon bags suspended in the rumen increased with fineness of grinding. Apparent digestibility of D.M. within the gut tended to fall with fineness of grinding, as did mean retention time (MRT) of a particulate marker, [103Ru]phenanthroline ([103Ru]phen), within the gut and of [103Ru]phen and a liquid marker, [51Cr]EDTA, within the rumen. Dry-sieved abomasal particles were much smaller than particles of any of the hay preparations, most passing through a 0·6 mm screen.

A second experiment was made on four other sheep, fitted with rumen cannulae and given a similar hay, chopped to 50 mm or milled through 2, 5 or 20 mm screens. Apparent digestibility of D.M. within the gut fell significantly with fineness of grinding, from 55% with the chopped hay to 46% with the 2 mm hay, as did MRT, from 45 to 40 h respectively. Rumen pH at 1 h after feeding decreased with fineness of grinding.

In a third experiment, using the four sheep given chopped or 2 mm hay, retention times of particulate matter and of fluid in the reticulo-rumen and in the caecum-colon were measured. [103Ru]phen and [51Cr]EDTA were dosed together into either the rumen or the terminal ileum, and the rates of decline of marker concentration in rumen samples or faeces respectively were used to calculate the appropriate half times(t½). In the rumen particulate and fluid markers showed significantly shorter t½ values with the 2 mm hay (20·8 and 12·4 h, respectively) than with the chopped hay (25·9 and 15·6 h, respectively) without a significant difference in rumen outflow (0·437 and 0·492 l/h, respectively). In the caecum-colon the corresponding t½ values were 6·4 and 6·3 h, and 7·1 and 6·6 h, there being no significant difference either between markers or between diets.

Samples of chopped hay and of 20, 5 and 2 mm hays were suspended in bags in the rumen of sheep given either chopped or 2 mm hay to eat. The fine hays lost D.M. more rapidly than the coarse hays but D.M. loss was slower when the sheep's diet was 2 mm hay that when it was chopped hay.

It is concluded that three factors accounted for the effect of milling on digestibility: retention time in the reticulo-rumen, D.M. degradation rate in the rumen, and the potential digestibility of the hay preparation (asymptotic D.M. loss as measured in the rumen bag studies). It appeared that fine grinding reduced the digestibility of the hay because the effects of shortened MRT in reducing duration of digestion and of lowered rumen pH in depressing cellulolysis outweighed the effects of grinding in accelerating digestion and increasing potential digestibility within the rumen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 551 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, N. E., Mitchell, G. E. Jr, Little, C. O. & Call, J. L. (1972). Post-prandial patterns of ovine ruminoreticular motility and digesta passage. Journal of Animal Science 35, 102–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alwash, A. H. & Thomas, P. C. (1974). Effect of the size of hay particles on digestion in the sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Agricultural Engineers (1967). Agricultural Engineers' Yearbook. Method of Determining Modulus of Uniformity and Modulus of Fineness of Ground Feed. ASAE Recommendation: ASAE 241.1, p. 301.Google Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed.Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1. The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and on related problems. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binnerts, W. T., Van't Klooster, A. T. & Frens, A. M. (1968). Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments. Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Freer, M. (1966). Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 8. Experiments with ground, pelleted roughages. British Journal of Nutrition 20, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coombe, J. B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1965). Passage of digesta through the intestines of the sheep. Retention times in the small and large intestines. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 325–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dafaalla, B. F. M. & Kay, R. N. B. (1980). Effect of hay particle size on retention time, dry matter digestibility and rumen pH in sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 71A.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). The use of automation in determining nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method, with final calculations by computer. Analyst 95, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demarquilly, C. & Journet, M. (1967). Feeding value of pelleted hays. 1. Influence of type of hay and fineness of grinding on digestibility and amount eaten. Annales de Zootechnie 16, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). The chromium-51 complex of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a soluble rumen marker. British Journal of Nutrition 18, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadlalla, B. & Kay, R. N. B. (1987). Digestion and retention time of stained food in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of a concentrate diet on the passage of solute and particle markers through the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1986). The kinetics of particulate matter in the rumen. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A.), pp. 173–195. New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Boston, R. C. (1983). Interpretation of the faecal excretion patterns of solute and particle markers introduced into the rumen of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 575–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some application). Agricultural Handbook No. 379. Washington, DC: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973 a). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 3. Differential rates of passage of water and dry matter from the reticulo-rumen, abo-masum and caecum and proximal colon. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973 b). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rateconstants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoover, W. H. (1978). Digestion and absorption in the hindgut of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1789–1799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, B. W., Milligan, L. P. & Turner, B. V. (1984). Endoscopic observations of digesta transfer from the reticulo-rumen to omasum of cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64 (Supplement), 84–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C, Reid, C. S. W. & Dellow, D. W. (1973). Caecal cannulation in the sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 14, 78–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1977). A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, J. A. & Campling, R. C. (1972). Intake and digestibility of artificially dried forages in several physical forms. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, F. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Mann, S. O. (1983). Associative effects of mixed feeds. 1. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dell, G. D., King, W. A., Cook, W. C. & Moore, S. L. (1963). Effect of physical state of coastal Bermuda grass hay on passage through digestive tract of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 46, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poutiainen, E. (1968). Factors influencing the flow of fluid, saliva and some cations through the reticuloomasal orifice of the cow. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 7, supplement 3, 1–66.Google Scholar
Reid, C. S. W., Ulyatt, M. J. & Monro, J. A. (1977). The physical breakdown of feed during digestion in the rumen. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 37, 173–175.Google Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971). Useof 103Ru-labelled tris (1, 10-phenanthroline) Ruthenium (II) chloride as a marker in digestion studies with sheep. International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J. & Beever, D. E. (1980). The effect of conservation and processing on the digestion of forages by ruminants. In Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants (ed. Ruckebusch, Y. and Thivend, P.), pp. 291–308. Lancaster: MTP Press Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M. J., Baldwin, R. L. & Koong, L. J. (1976). The basis of nutritive value - a modelling approach. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 140–149.Google Scholar
Van Der Honing, Y. (1975). Intake and Utilisation of Energy of Rations with Pelleted Forages by Dairy Cows. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, U.S.A: O & B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1972). The effect of grinding and pelleting on the nutritive value of poor quality roughages for sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, J. G. & Smith, A. M. (1978). Particle sizes passed from rumen. Journal of Animal Science 46, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1967). The digestion of chopped and ground roughages by sheep. 1. The movement of digesta through the stomach. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Kennedy, P. M. (1984). Various aspects of reticulorumen digestive function in relation to diet and digesta particle size. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants (ed. Kennedy, P. M.), pp. 1–17. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Society of Animal Science, Occasional Publication 1.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1974). Scientific and technical progress in forage crop dehydration. Proceedings of the 12th International Grassland Congress, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar