Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:10:38.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of raw and treated jack beans(Canavalia ensiformis) and of canavanine on the short-term feed intake of chicks and pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Belmar
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autóonoma de Yucatáan, Apartado Postal 4–116, 97100 Méerida, Yucatáan, Méexico
T. R. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 2AT, UK

Summary

Four experiments were conducted in the Yucatán, Mexico, in 1991 and 1992 to study feed intake in 24 h trials with chicks and pigs fed diets containing either raw or treated jack beans or conventional diets with added canavanine.

Feed intake of chicks in the first hour was markedly reduced and feed intake of pigs was severely reduced when raw jack beans (300 g/kg for chicks, 250 g/kg for pigs) were included in their diets. Feed intake of pigs diminished to a greater extent than that of chicks when treated beans (300 g/kg) were included in the diet. Short-term feed intake of chicks was not affected when canavanine (3·5 g/kg) was added to a sorghum-soyabean diet. However, pigs showed a large drop in feed intake when canavanine was added to a maize-soya diet at only 0·8 g/kg. It was concluded that in both species the anti-nutritional factors in jack beans cause a rapid reduction in feed intake which precedes a depression in growth rate. The initial feed intake depression in pigs could be partly attributed to canavanine remaining in the jack beans after treatment. In the chicks' case, however, rejection of a diet containing treated jack bean was due to anti-nutritional factor(s) other than residual canavanine.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970).Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Belmar, R. & Morris, T. R. (1994). Effects of the inclusion of treated jack beans (Canavalia ensiformis)and the amino acid canavanine in chick diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 123, 393405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M.., Escobar, A., Montilla, J., Viera, J., Carabano, J., Mora, M., Risso, J., Parra, R. & Preston, T. R. (1983). Canavalia ensiformis:a legume for the tropics. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia (Eds Farrell, D. J. & Vohra, P.), pp. 129140. Armidale, Australia: The University of New England.Google Scholar
D'mello, J. P. F. (1991). Toxic amino acids. In Toxic Substances in Crop Plants (Eds D'mello, J. P. F., Duffus, C. M. & Duffus, J. H.), pp. 2148. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
D'mello, J. P. F. & Walker, A. G. (1991). Detoxification of jack beans (Canavalia ensiformis):studies with young chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33, 117127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'mello, J. P. F., Acamovic, T. & Walker, A. G. (1985). Nutritive value of jack beans (Canavalia ensiformis(L.) DC.) for young chicks. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 62, 145150.Google Scholar
Forbes, M. (1986). The Voluntary Food Intake of Farm Animals1. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Institut D'Elevage Et De Méedecine Véetéerinaire Des Pays Tropicaux (1987). Manual of Poultry Production in the Tropics(Translated by Say, R. R.), pp. 1214. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Ologhobo, A. D., Apata, D. F. & Oyejide, A. (1993). Utilisation of raw jackbean (Canavalia ensiformis) and jackbean fractions in diets for broiler chicks. British Poultry Science 34, 323337.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, G. A. (1977). Preparation and colorimetric analysis of L-canavanine. Analytical Biochemistry 77, 147151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems (1986). Computer program. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. A. & Rosenthal, G. A. (1987). Metabolism of L [guanidinooxy-146] canavanine in the rat. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 91, 406414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, D. A., Rosenthal, G. A., Gold, D. V. & Dickey, K. (1986). Growth inhibition of rat colon tumor by Lcanavanine. Cancer Research 46, 28982903.Google ScholarPubMed