Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

A geographically scaled analysis of adaptation to climate change with spatial models using agricultural systems in Africa

  • S. N. SEO (a1)

The present paper provides a geographically scaled analysis of adaptation to climate change using adoption of agricultural systems observed across Africa. Using c. 9000 farm surveys, spatial logit models were applied to explain observed agricultural system choices by climate variables after accounting for soils, geography and other household characteristics. The results reveal that strong neighbourhood effects exist and a spatial re-sampling and bootstrapping approach can remove them. The crops-only system is adopted most frequently in the lowland humid forest, lowland sub-humid, mid-elevation sub-humid Agro-Ecological Zones (AEZs) and in the highlands in the east and in southern Africa. Integrated farming is favoured in the lowland dry savannah, moist savannah and semi-arid zones in West Africa and eastern coastal zones. A livestock-only system is favoured most in the mid/high-elevation moist savannahs located in southern Africa. Under a hot and dry Canadian Climate Centre (CCC) scenario, the crops-only system should move out from the currently favoured regions of humid zones in the lowlands towards the mid-/high elevations. It declines by more than 5% in the lowland savannahs. Integrated farming should increase across all the AEZs by as much as 5%, but less so in the deserts or in the humid forest zones in the mid-/high elevations. A livestock-only system should increase by 2–5% in the lowland semi-arid, dry savannah and moist savannah zones in the lowlands. Adaptation measures should be carefully scaled, up or down, considering geographic and ecological differentials as well as household characteristics, as proposed in the present study.

Corresponding author
To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Adams , B. Mccarl , K. Segerson , C. Rosenzweig , K. Bryant , B. Dixon , R. Connor , R. Evenson & D. Ojima (1999). The economic effects of climate change on US agriculture. In The Impact of Climate Change on the United States Economy (Eds R. Mendelsohn & J. Neumann ), pp. 1854. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

K. Anderson & W. A. Masters (2009). Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.

L. Anselin (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

K. J. Beron & W. P. M. Vijverberg (2004). Probit in a spatial context: a Monte Carlo approach. In Advances in Spatial Econometrics: Methodology, Tools and Applications (Eds L. Anselin , R. J. G. M. Florax & S. J. Rey ), pp. 169192. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

N. A. C. Cressie (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.