Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T17:12:14.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grazed pasture parameters. I. Pasture dry-matter production and availability in a stocking rate and grazing management experiment with dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A.G. Campbell
A.G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Net pasture dry matter production and available pasture dry matter were measured over 3 years in a small-scale replica of the study of the effects of dairy cow grazing management and stocking rate reported by McMeekan & Walshe (1963).

2. The four treatments were

(i) Controlled rotational grazing, light stocking rate (0.95 cows/acre).

(ii) Controlled rotational grazing, heavy stocking rate (1.19 cows/acre).

(iii) Uncontrolled, set stocked grazing, light stocking rate (0.95 cows/acre).

(iv) Uncontrolled, set stocked grazing, heavy stocking rate (1.19 cows/acre).

3. The pasture measurement technique employed measured net pasture production (gains through new growth minus losses from all sources). It is argued that this parameter, rather than absolute pasture production, governs the changes in the dry matter feed supply to the grazing animal.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , October 1966 , pp. 199 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Campbell, A. G. (1961). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 21, 18.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. G. (1964). Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 24, 17.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. G. (1966). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. (1950). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol. A 32 (4), 22.Google Scholar
Ivins, J. D., Dilnot, J. & Davison, J. (1958). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 13, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingman, D. L., Miles, S. R. & Mott, G. O. (1943). Soc. Agron. 35, 739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, F. T. (1949). Proc. Ruahura Fmrs' Conf. Week, p. 179.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1956). Proc. 7th Int. Grassld Congr. p. 146.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1953). N.Z. Sci. Rev. 11, 115.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1959). Principles of Animal Production, 3rd ed. p. 228. Christchurch: Whitcombe and Tombs Ltd.Google Scholar
Mcmeekan, C. P. & Walshe, M. J. (1963). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 61, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, J. J. & Brady, J. J. (1955). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 10, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1955). Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. Week, p. 206.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E., Norman, D. B. & Bee, J. W. (1929). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 19, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar